1938 News Report: Financial War on “Anti-Semitic States” for “Persecuting Jewish FINANCIERS” not Civilian Jews

The Worker, the official organ of the Australian Labour Party in Queensland and regular periodical for various amalgamated Labour Unions throughout Australia (see here), reported to the world on January 4, 1938, that “International Jewry” was orchestrating a heavily funded financial war, in addition to their previous Declaration of War‘ – being the continuance of the 1933 world-wide Economic Boycott against Germany.

financiers_shadow-copyINTERNATIONAL JEWRY – Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States – £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised

‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.

‘The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.

‘The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000,000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.

‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.”

Source: National Library of Australia 

For over eight decades, the world has been led to believe that from the outset of 1933, the Germans “Persecuted” everyday German-Jews for simply being Jewish, even though German-Jews of the time, denounced this international propaganda. By International Jewry’s own admission, it was the self proclaimed “Jewish FINANCIERS” who – incidentally had their parasitic usurious positions outlawed by Germany’s Economic Reform –  were the ones being singled out and they did in fact feel the need to differentiate themselves from everyday Jews with this claim, as to who was supposedly being persecuted.
The targeting of “Jewish Financiers” was a well founded claim, as NSDAP policies and reform saw the cleansing of Communists in governmental positions and immoral financial and trading practices removed from the Reich – it just so happened that around 98% of these Communists and unscrupulous Speculators, were in fact Jewish. If these communist elements within Germany were Spanish or Chinese, their resulting fate would have been the same and it would have been due to their corrupt practices which greatly effected German society, not their ethnicity – as the other 2% of non-Jewish communists who also lost their positions, attests to.
However, whether being forbidden to continue economic rape against a nation and its people, could be considered “Persecution” is another question. Perhaps the reader may want to consider what life is like as the impoverished, starving and economically raped people, opposed to those minority tycoons who had their astronomical revenues through economic debt slavery reduced, in order to identify who was actually being persecuted?


judea-declares-war_shadowThis same ‘International Jewry’ Declared War on Germany in 1933, with the same ‘Jewish Persecution’ propaganda as the excuse… but what had actually occurred at this point in 1933? The German-Jews denounced the international Persecution Propaganda in defense of the honour of Germany, the Nuremberg Laws weren’t enacted until late 1935, even many German-Jews who lived under two flags at that later time, saw them as reasonable and did not suffer any deprivations with a new National status and, the Krystallnacht False-Flag – which resulted in the internment of many German-Jews – did not occur until November 1938 (10 months after the aforementioned half a billion Jewish financial war plan)… so what prompted ‘International Jewry’ to Declare War on Germany in 1933?

The duly elected Adolf Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933 and less than two months later, Judea Declared Economic Warfare on Germany, March 24, 1933 – coincidentally, only one day after Hitler received Plenary Power, via the passing of the Enabling Act – the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich (“Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich”). The Law to Remedy Distress, resulted in communist non-effect in the Reichstag, the abolition of over 30 useless, divide and conflicting parties that had destroyed Germany for the previous 14 years. The fact that it was International Jewry who responded to the abolition of communist power within Germany, by economic warfare, also attests to who the communists were/are.
(Hitler’s Reichstag speech, March 23, 1933)
International Jewry’s Declaration of Economic Warfare on Germany, was no idle threat upon a suffering people, who were reliant on their export in order for the people just to eat. The NSDAP came into possession of an impoverished nation and starving people, had virtually no army, the country was broke, enslaved by impossible WWI reparations and more than 30% of the people were suffering unemployment… all while a privileged few were living the high life at the expense of the starving and poverty stricken majority.
Germany had nothing in its hands to be a threat to anyone (except communist and financier positions) and with the monumental national problems within the country, the priorities of what deserved attention to revive the German Nation, did not revolve around putting yellow star stickers on less than one half of 1% of the population, as some inane attempt at national remedy.
However, what the NSDAP did possess, was a well prepared plan for economic reform and a 25 Point Program for the revival of the Nation, a program which was pivotal on the embodiment of the National Socialists Economic Reform. A program that would have been hindered if the communist votes were allowed to remain in the Reichstag.

The NSDAP’s Economic Reform for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money, was widely known in economist circles from 1919 and the 25 Point Program was publicly announced on February 24, 1920… It was this well considered and developed plan, which the NSDAP absolutely intended to implement, is what the self proclaimed “Jewish” Financiers anticipated and knew to be a threat to their corrupt, yet powerful positions. These international financial Tycoons and war profiteers, obviously felt a pre-emptive Counter-Offensive was in order!
A look at a few of the 25 Points will highlight who would benefit from them and who would detest these economic principles, claiming the abolition of their national theft as Persecution;

6. The right to vote on the State’s government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.

11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.

The Breaking of the Slavery of Interest

12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.

15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

Point 6: Opposed to being considered pro-German, shockingly enough in Germany itself, it has been ridiculed as discriminatory toward Jews; but in Western Nations, is it not Constitutional that Prime Ministers and Presidents be citizens of the nations they purport to lead, in attempt to guarantee national loyalties? Further, for example, would it be considered a moral political principle for U.S. citizens to flood Chinese Parliamentary positions, to dictate how the Chinese people will be administered in their own land, by American ideological legislative enactments? Would it be ethical to allow an ethnicity of less than 0.5% of any population, to decide how another ethnicity of +99% will be administered in their own land? Is that not contradictory to the Universal Right of Self-Determination, where Peoples have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and political policies, without interference?


Point 18
may seem excessively harsh to those who are absent of understanding in exactly how injurious the unscrupulous practices of usury and speculator profiteering is to the people… Usury, or rather issuing debt (via IOU) with attached interest, is not the exchange or loan of money… it is the demand of payment from one party (the Creditor) – for which they gave or forfeited absolutely nothing – from another party (the Debtor), who is required to extract affluence to service the greater interest first, before even reducing the principle, which is only based on an inequivalent, minimal fraction of a reserved asset (Fractional Reserve Lending). When this is done on a large scale, on a national scale, in the Millions and Billions, it is nothing but economic rape and enslavement of a nations people, who are ordered to exchange their time, their effort, their labour, their creativity, ingenuity, productivity and their time away from family, to give all the fruit of their efforts to economic racketeers, to self-licensed loan sharks, who gave them nothing in the first instance except an accounting entry of debt – a flick of a pen… this is precisely what Point 11 of the NSDAP’s program is referring to- “The abolition of incomes unearned by work.”
This infinite debt system, of interest on interest (demand for everything in exchange for nothing) is the ONLY CAUSE of endless inflation; and the worlds so-called Leaders, who contract these International Financiers, through promise to service their demand, do not produce anything. So where do the worlds so-called Leaders (middle-men) extract payment from to serve the International Financiers? Of course the people, the producers, who are the only source of affluence from which it can be extracted and, as the effect of interest on interest continually increases the debt demand, newly invented and increased taxes, fees, levy’s, tolls, fines, schemes and the general increase in the cost of everything, is the only way the Leaders can create increasing revenue to meet the International Financiers interest-debt demands… thus, continually reducing the value of the currency.
Is it fair or ethical to get something for nothing, through legalised theft demand? What about getting everything for nothing? Who in their right mind would think anyone who has risked nothing and given nothing, has the right to demand from another almost all the benefits of everything they’ve produced and created? What could benefit the people if all the fruits of their efforts were reinvested back into the peoples interests (by the billions), opposed to continually flowing into the pockets of the debt creators, the self-licensed loan sharks, who offered nothing?
This is a crime, a theft, so massive, so incomprehensible against all people, depriving them of the reward of their efforts and in most cases, depriving them of their most basic needs to live…
This is a crime against humanity!
So is Point 18 excessively harsh considering the scale of theft, deprivation, poverty imposition and enslavement? Is it Persecution to be denied the legal ability to continue wide-spread economic enslavement and theft, from the many to the few? Is it Persecution to out-law individuals from being able to conduct crimes against humanity under the threat of punishment? This writer thinks not! The reader can come to their own conclusion.

Anti-Semitic States…?

The Worker reports that “Anti-Semitic States” [are burdened with debt], colloquially suggesting that a national, political institution (a ‘State’), holds a racial ideological bias, on behalf of all individuals under that political system, which would include Jews themselves? Whether today’s Jews of European origin are in fact Semites, is for a different discussion. In any event, the clarification of what pertains to an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ by the self-proclaimed Jewish Financiers, continues to be pursuant to economic policies and who has control over a nations policies.

Through the vote of the German people, Hitler won against the Communists in Germany, he threw out the Bankers and their fraudulent credit systems from the nation, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour (not speculative gold), developed immense public works programs for employment and installed tight controls on prices and wages – income for the German people which he increased by 10.9%. Stock markets were also controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators; as such, Germany’s Reichsmark could not be speculated against on the international markets and Germany’s sovereign currency was not part of the Jewish financiers international usury debt system.
Mussolini’s Italy worked similarly with its own economic system, including expropriatory tax on war profits and large scale public works, thus, was also considered an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ with Japan later following a close third.

As a ‘State’ in the political spectrum, is generally applied to policies which implementations are mostly related to economics; and as the self described Jewish Financiers claim it was they who were being Persecuted by said State, it would appear, by their own definition, that an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not give the Jewish Financiers free reign over their nations people and productivity, nor legislative capacity for their economic debt slavery systems.
A nation not enslaved by usurious debt to the International Jewish Financiers, thus not under its control, is somehow Anti-Semitic?

Burdened with debt…?

great-gold-heist_1933_shadowWas it not all nations who were involved in WWI that were burdened with [war] debt? Was it not this war debt that spurred the manipulated Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929, which grew into the Great Depression of longevity through to the late 1930’s? Who benefited from this great suffering of peoples from all nations around the world, buying up everything for a penny on the pound? Who used this manipulated scenario to steal all the Americans gold, with the excuse it needed to be confiscated to the private shareholders of the Federal Reserve in order to revive from the Great Depression – facilitated by FDR’s Executive Order 6102, better-known as the Great Gold Heist of 1933? Who were the War Profiteers, Market Speculators and International Financiers that could have foreseen and benefited from such a war and resulting international economic catastrophe? The reader can perhaps speculate themselves to find that answer?

It was many of the western nations which were also still laden with WWI debt and could not pay it at the time (and thanks to interest on interest, are still paying for it today). But unlike Jewish Bolshevik Russia, following the so-called Russian Revolution (rather, Jewish usurpation of Russia) – conveniently, a mid-WWI coup d’etat – National Socialist Germany did not abandon the WWI debt and was making good on the payments. The Jewish Bolshevik USSR – for some reason(?) – wasn’t subjected to a credit recall like other nations? Special nepotistic favouritism by the creditors perhaps? However, Germany did not have gold reserves, they were stolen by the All-lies during WWI, but somehow, after total blame for WWI, accompanied by the astronomical reparation payments (“Tribute Madness” as Hitler referred), civil war, the Great Depression which the entire world was suffering and the greatest hyperinflation a nation has ever been subjected to in history, began to thrive economically and prosper above all other nations; and unemployment was near eradicated from over 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% by the end of 1935, regardless of the WWI debt.
Was this just some economic accident, a miracle, perhaps an unexplainable ‘Economic Miracle’ as the victor economists would have us believe? Or was it simply ‘Economic Logic’ facilitated by a well considered and planned Economic Reform?

With the differing national economic formats, it might beg the question also; why couldn’t the Allies make good on their WWI payments? Who was it they were actually indebted to – therefore controlled by? Were these industrious nations not able to manage their own currencies and productivity, to find a way to feed their people? Despite the invisible debt, did they not have vast resources and the physical capacity to at least grow food, thereby creating work to produce it?
Of course, if external entities control a nations currency, control the gold reserves (or confiscated it), therefore controlling the value of currency based on the fractional gold standard (which in-turn makes it a commodity of speculation in itself), then these entities which have issued the debt (IOU imposition) dictate where any revenue or surplus – if any – will be directed… Obviously the International financiers, in the interests of humanity and good will, did not (and will not) find it in their hearts to forego this debt created from a flick of a pen, to direct future revenue back to the people. The debtors, being beholden to the currency creators, the creditors, the self-licensed loan sharks, then offer the nations public assets to service the unpaid debt (credit recall), thus making the International Financiers the owners of those countries National productivity, manufacturing, infrastructure and utilities etc. (commonly disguised as Privatisation) who in-turn, ultimately charge the people for the use of their own public services they built… Unfortunately, post-privatisation, the people no longer receive the affluence generated from their own collective productivity, as the former public services become private businesses for profit. Further, the International Financiers still demand the interest on interest be paid! But where would that revenue come from once the people lose the benefits of their privatised public services and works? Inflation and an endless creation of new and increased taxes. This is total theft and wealth extraction out of all nations who submit to the demands of the International Financiers, who are nothing but large scale Counterfeiters = Criminals!
I refer to Point 18 of the NSDAP Program.

So who would these external elements of fiat currency (debt) issuance be? Could it be the same self-described Jewish Financiers? Why would these Jewish Financiers, if not International Financiers, be interested in foreign states who have taken steps to implement their own sovereign economic systems, having to describe them as “Anti-Semitic States”?
In reflection of the economically crippled world of the day, the majority of nations had the suffering yolk of international war debt and results of commodity speculation around their necks, thus controlled and owned… but the few nations that broke free from this economic enslavement system, giving back to their own people, whilst still paying the debt, were the ones the world was told, were an evil threat to humanity, had war declared upon them and were labelled Anti-Semitic.
“Anti-Semitic States burdened with debt”? No, States not under Jewish Financier control!

“In the exchange of telegrams from the 1939 -1940 period,
the British were ready to negotiate peace, if
Germany returned to the Gold Standard.”
∼ Captain J. Creagh-Scott, 1947


Jewry faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Austria…?

The Persecution narrative which had been peddled throughout the world in regard to European Jews, was not only a repetitive escalation of propaganda since the 1933 Jewish Declaration of War against Germany, but common propaganda prior to the Third Reich and beyond; even claiming Jewish Persecution under the Jewish coup government that usurped Empirical Russia (aka Russian Revolution), persecuted by their co-religionists, even though under U.S.S.R. law Anti-Semitism was punishable by death?
So is there any logical claim that Jewry was subject to persecution by Rumania as an Anti-Semitic State? Rumania was not allied with Germany or any other state at this time, it sought to maintain neutrality and cordial international relations. Poland had its own inner ethnic turmoil, social and employment problems, but was not allied with Germany either. However, with the cordial and progressive efforts Hitler had made toward diplomatic relations, the late First Marshall of Poland, Jozef Pilzudski and Adolf Hitler did sign a German-Polish non Aggression Pact in 1934, agreeing to forego military conflict for a period of 10 years and Germany recognising Polands borders… Unfortunately, Marshall Pilzudski died in 1935. Poland had historically been used by Allied states to incite war and border conflict – a cordial relationship with Germany would not have been pleasing to the International Financiers and war mongers, therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State.
Hitler speaks on German-Polish Peace here.


Despite Rumania’s 1921 Little Entente alliance in defense of potential Hungarian territorial ambitions, an agreement to supposedly safeguard against any restoration by the Habsburgs in response the Versailles Treaty and, the previous 1926 military pact with France, via the 1921 Act, King Carol II was caught in a sphere of power struggles and desired to stay neutral as much as possible. However, it too had communist political party conflict, internal ethnic turmoil from sizable ethnic minorities, border disputes, along with its much sought after natural resources, especially oil. Germany’s contract with Royal Dutch Shell, via its pro-Nationalist CEO, Henri Deterding, who had contracts with Rumanian oil too, saw the commodity speculators not impressed with the growing German-Rumanian diplomatic relations that were unfolding, especially after the Little Entente’s complete disbandment in 1938 – therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State. King Carol’s Rumania became ripe for social turmoil and movements, to keep Romania with state weakening internal strife, so as to not side with, or trade with Germany.

Austria? Since the end of WWI, the Austrian people who had arbitrarily been subject to the dissection of the German/Austro-Hungarian Empire, via the Versailles dictat and the Treaty of Saint Germain, had desired to re-join the German Reich and even more eagerly, since Germany began to prosper under National Socialism, while they themselves suffered in debt and poverty. But in defiance of the peoples right to self-determination, the merger was forbidden by the WWI All-lies! Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933. Austria too was in political, social and economic turmoil, with revolutionary movements and even civil war in 1934. Dollfuss eventually dissolved parliament and made himself dictator, outlawing movements against him. He was a conservative, anti-Communist and attempted to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism. He was assassinated during a 1934 attempted coup d’etat, the July Putsch and his successor, Kurt Schuschnigg, followed closely in his format. The growing national feeling to unite once again with Germany, would have been an anxious anticipation for the Jewish Financiers. So to excite international condemnation of Austria, by defamatory accusations of an Anti-Semitic State, served as a strategic psychological precursor for international support for war, whether it be military or economic warfare. Unlike in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still conducting their usurious financial business in Austria, but only 3 months after the above financial war plan was announced, 99.71% of the people turned out and 99.73% of the those Austrian people voted to rejoin the Reich in an April 10, 1938 Referendum. On the same day, another Referendum was held in Germany to ask the volk if they wished to rejoin Austria too. Of the 99.5% of the people who turned out, 99.8% of the German people agreed to unite again with their Austrian brothers and sisters… The Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed that same week, with all of its assets seized by the Reich government… the act of an apparent Anti-Semitic State against corrupt Financiers

Adolf Hitler Speaks At Heldenplatz In Vienna 15 March 1938
in the unification of Germany and Austria.

They may find their very existence threatened…?

The self-described Jewish Financiers and Leaders of International Jewry, felt that strongly about their systems and economic positions of extreme power being potentially replaced, that not only did they declare a world-wide economic boycott on Germany in 1933 – which had no long term effect once Germany took control of its own economy – but 5 years later wanted to target nations who might establish their own sovereign currencies and trade practices along with Germany too. They stated this financial war would “be fought on the worlds stock exchanges,” but as we have already established above, Germany’s Reichsmark was not part of the Jewish Financiers usury system and therefore could not be speculated against on international markets and the German stock markets were also tightly controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators. So whose very existence were they now threatening? The Polish? The Rumanians? The Austrians?
As we’ve witnessed over many generations, when these international economic players impose Blockades, Boycotts and Sanctions (same effect – different titles) against various nations people, their very existence is actually threatened and ultimately millions upon millions of civilian people have starved to death, or by disease and illness due to not having access to sanitary and medical supplies. This is the inhumane extent that International Jewry are prepared to go to, in order to keep their financial power over nations and peoples.

However, was this £500,000,000 (an estimated $52.6 Trillion USD today) actually going to be used purely on the world stock exchanges? Considering that the New York Stock Exchange in 2011 alone, measured Market Capitalisation (USD Billions) at 14,242; and Trade Value (USD Billions) at 20,161; then one could speculate where this finance would be directed.
Another aspect to consider is the Stock Market Crash of 1929 had reduced the value in all capital just 9 years earlier…

The £500,000,000 was clearly an extremely excessive amount of wealth in the day, to be held by one group or organisation, as the Worker reported that; ‘The leaders of international Jewry [who met in a village near Geneva] expected no trouble in raising such a fund – which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers and obviously this kind of excessive economic power would not be relinquished with honour, or without a fight. The owners (or confiscators) of gold did actually do very well from the 1929 crash, as the price of a single ounce of gold rose from just $291 an ounce in 1929, to $539 in 1939… how speculatively lucky for those who held confiscated the gold?

Coincidentally, a year later, the Cairns Post reported on July 8, 1939 (3 months before the outbreak of war – allegedly a surprise invasion by Germany), that the Governors of the Bank of England had planned for a secret gold vault to store, yes, quite the coincidence, £500,000,000 worth of gold, for war securities.

SECRET VAULT FOR £500,000,000

Governors of the Bank of England have drawn up plans for transporting £500,000,000 – of the nations’s gold reserve to a secret vault in the country in the event of war.
This vault is hundreds of miles from London, and comprises a bomb-proof safe deposit. The convoy, will be escorted by an armed guard of both police and soldiers
The gold represents Britain’s staying power-the basis on which war loans might be raised, and the purchasing power which will ensure supplies of food and raw materials from overseas.

Where was this funding spent? Was anything actually spent?

Let’s use one nation for an example… The American mobilisation for WWII at the end of 1941, had moved approximately ten million people out of the civilian labour force and into the war. Government-financed capital spending accounted for only 5% of the annual U.S. investment in industrial capital in 1940; but by 1943, it had increased to 67% of all U.S. investment.

Bernard Baruch was yet another Jewish financier, stock investor and political consultant. As a partner in A.A. Housman & Company, his earnings and commissions enabled him to buy a seat on the New York Stock Exchange. There he amassed a fortune before the age of 30 by profiting from speculation in the market. By 1910, he had become one of Wall Street’s best-known financiers. In a treasonous display of conflict of interest, he was appointed Chief Advisor to both war-time U.S. Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt on all economic matters; and during WWII Baruch controlled 351 of the most important branches of American heavy industry. He was on the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense and, in 1918, he was the chairman of his new War Industries Board, which managed the US’ economic mobilisation during WWI. He also served as a staff-member at the Versailles conference in France.
For his work in WWI, Baruch was awarded the Army Distinguished Service Medal which cited, in part; Baruch, a United States Civilian, for exceptionally meritorious and distinguished services to the Government of the United States, in a duty of great responsibility during World War I, in the organization and administration of the War Industries Board and in the coordination of allied purchases in the United States. By establishing a broad and comprehensive policy for the supervision and control of the raw materials, manufacturing facilities, and distribution of the products of industry, he stimulated the production of war supplies, coordinated the needs of the military service and the civilian population, and contributed alike to the completeness and speed of the mobilization and equipment of the military forces and the continuity of their supply.”


Winston Churchill and Bernard Baruch

When the United States entered WWII, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a Special Adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization. He supported what was known as a “Work or Fight” bill. Baruch advocated the creation of a permanent Super-agency similar to his old Industries Board of WWI. His theory ‘elevated the role of Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists in determining what was needed and who would produce it.’ But did the U.S. have surplus to be able to afford all this war time spending to these Civilian Businessmen, especially after the Great Depression? If not, where was the vast finance for it sourced from? Which Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists profiteered from this great war-time expenditure and investment in war production? And on top of that, who would the war debt, with interest on interest be paid to at the end of the war? Has it even been paid off today?

In yet another economic coincidence on the international stage of profiteering and war debt, on February 12, 1949, the Townsville Daily Bulletin reported, that foreign borrowers had defaulted on their payments and interest, to the tune of… you guessed it… £500,000,000.

£500,000,000 DEFAULT

LONDON, Feb. 11. – Foreign borrowers who have defaulted in their payments of capital and interest, now owe British investors nearly £500 million.
The Council of Foreign Bondholders says this in its annual report.
The council protects the interests of holders of foreign government, State or municipal obligations issued in Britain.


Considering that we know Germany’s currency could hardly be effected by international market speculators in 1938, and due to the self sufficiency of the 4 Year Plan having succeeded exponentially, we learn that it is the people with money to spend, is what in fact creates national economic growth. Only the public demand for produce and manufacturing (resulting in more paid employment for further spending and demand), can stimulate national economies… which is the effect of compounding affluence, opposed to compounding interest-debt/extraction – it is the very difference between a positive affluence based currency, opposed to a negative debt based currency. Demand cannot be created by a poor people without money and no employment in manufacturing or production can be developed, unless there is people wanting the goods and can actually buy it. No manufacturer or producer will grow or make more than what is in demand, thus, will not need further employees.
This type of economic growth can never be achieved with a debt based currency system, as all the affluence is continually flowing from the many people, to the few loan-sharks. Such is the format of Jewish usury systems all over the world… the economic enslavement of all people, never to rise above negative debt, to positive affluence.

The mechanics of the Third Reich’s economic system, saw the nation come from being the most impoverished and starving during the world-wide Great Depression, to soaring in prosperity above all others, almost instantaneously. Jewish economists and publishers wouldn’t dare explain the simplicity of these economic reforms to the rest of the worlds nations, thus claimed them to be a miracle, an “Economic Miracle” – No such miracle exists!

The self-described International Jewish Financiers, describe states with such economies as “Anti-Semitic States” given their policy to not facilitate Jewish usury practices or, economic control and enslavement over their nation and people. These Jewish El-ites absolutely did consider these policies as a threat to their existence (perhaps even Persecution), an existence based on parasiticism, even a war on their parasiticism – and they did indeed respond in kind.
If the economic systems of the so-called “Anti-Semitic States” had been adopted by other nations – which it certainly would have in time, if they were left alone – then their parasitic existence would have disintigrated, all their hoards of useless inanimate gold wouldn’t have helped them and they may have even had to work to support themselves. Such could not be tolerated and the answer to this was not to leave them alone, but… Total War! Declared twice by the self styled International Jewry, well before 1939.

However, they not only destroyed nations and people they couldn’t initially control, but prospered further with even more economic enslavement of those who fought their war for them. Was it really £500,000,000 to be played on the stock market, against nations whose economies could not be effected by it? Or was it the basis for so-called war loans?
The Worker did state that their “very existence might be threatened,” but it was rather by imposing debt currency onto various peoples Governments, to build war machines for their actual physical destruction.
Not only did the the future generations have this war-debt enslavement put around their necks before they were even born, but this expenditure resulted in Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists (who decided who would produce it), thrive in the biggest manufacturing boom in history, as well as thriving in the rebuilding and construction of the destroyed countries post-war.
Moreover, they not only achieved great speculative profit, great debt revenue, great business in manufacturing and construction, destruction of millions of people and families all over the world, destruction of ancient historical and irreplaceable architecture; but to top it all off, they got to keep all the gold too… not that anyone saw this half a billion pounds worth of gold that the debt currency was supposedly created on – we’ll just have to take their word for it that they had it… in any event, they didn’t lend gold out, or give any away, just created debt on its purported existence, so they risked and gave NOTHING!

We are led to believe that gold is a real asset to regulate a consistent value in money, but how does that work in reality in a debt-based currency system?
The International Jewish Financiers [allegedly] held half a billion pounds worth of gold, to which they gave to no one (risked and forfeited nothing). A half a billion pounds worth of debt was issued to various Governments based on its [alleged] existence. The Governments transferred/spent this debt-credit on armaments in the businesses of Civilian Industrialists, debt which then transformed into being half a billion pounds worth of revenue for the recipients – who are likely the same international financiers and stock investors, such as Bernard Baruch. These stock investors then received great commissions and wealth through the increased value of their shares, due to the rapid sales and manufacturing in their industrial businesses.

To summarise; They gave nothing away, they imposed half a billion pounds worth of debt, they received half a billion pounds worth of revenue from it on top of the gold they [allegedly] held, their businesses boomed and stock shares grew in value (great speculation)… and they end up demanding that they are still owed another half a billion pounds worth of revenue, due to Government default on debt payment… This is more than tripling their net worth, as well as injecting more debt-based currency into the entire currency pool – reducing the currency’s value thereby.
Remember, this does not even include the infinite interest (usury) on half a billion pounds.

Risked Nothing – Gave Nothing – Took Everything


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Jewish Elites persecute Jewish Citizens to create hysteria for an International Jurisdiction of Impunity in Palestine

Persecution propaganda for the reward of the Palestinian usurpation agenda

In a 1976 interview, Harold Rosenthal, Senior Administrative Aide, to high ranking US Senator Jacob Javits, was recorded stating the following…

“…Anyway, the Jews at that time had a very wise Rabbi leader, a world leader, and his advice was respected throughout the world. He said that the Jews must pretend to become Christians and bide their time and make real sacrifices if necessary.

We have always been ready to sacrifice a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership. This was the plan of the Jews who instigated WW II. Some Jews were sacrificed so that the “persecution” propaganda could continue. It is a small price and there is nothing wrong with that.”

He later continued;
“You know we laugh about the six million story, just like the story that Christ was a Jew and the God’s Chosen People story. This should show people that we have a solidarity like none other in the world. Jews have a closeness to other Jews whom they have never seen or perhaps even heard of.”

Chaim Weizmann, President of the Zionist Organization and first President of Israel. Weizmann was in the United States at the time of the Israeli Declaration of Independence and convinced President Truman to Officially recognise the illegal State within hours.

Abridged narration of investigative journalist and author David Morrisons’ book; Heroes, Antiheroes And The Holocaust


There isn’t enough space or time to present all the machinations of the leaders of American Jewry, so we will focus around just one, the leader of ‘Reform Judaism’ and the ‘American Jewish Congress’, Rabbi Stephen Wise (actually, Weisz).
His closest friend and correspondent was Justice Felix Frankfurter. Of Felix, Jerry Rabow in his book, 50 Jewish Messiahs writes;

“United States Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter is reported to have received a copy of Eva Frank’s portrait from his mother, a descendent of the Prague [Sabbataean] Frankist family.”

pp. 208 – The five or six Supreme Court justices that attended the performance on behalf of European Jewry, were deeply impressed but it never crossed their mind that it was up to them to do something about it. They figured that if Frankfurter hadn’t done anything, there was little to do.

Frankfurter is quoted saying;
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes.”
~ Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

Regarding Stephen Wise, Rabbi Antelman provides this description in, To Eliminate The Opiate Volume II

“Consider Stephen Wise, head of the Reform movement in the United States during World War II. As the slaughter was going on in Europe, Wise was more interested in his own gratification. Wise was both a Communist and a Sabbataean Jew.”

Wise being a Communist is attested to by Maurice Malkin, a member of the Communist Party who returned to Judaism. In his book, Return To My Father’s House, he states Wise was a Sabbataean, as was also shown in Helen Lawrenson’s book, Stranger At The Party. In her chronicle of a sexual encounter with the so-called Rabbi Wise, she describes how Wise had sex with her in his office on his conference table, and quoted the verse from Psalms which Sabbataeans did when engaged in sexual intercourse. – p 217

The following abridgement of David Morrison’s chronicle on Stephen Wise, highlights the deliberate condemnation to suffering of as many European Jews as possible in war torn Germany, evoking the desired global sympathy.

pp 107 – Wise wrote to Albert Einstein attempting to displace blame for Roosevelt’s silence on the alleged “German atrocities” on the Warburgs:

I must say to you in strictest confidence that I saw the President yesterday…His first word was, “Max Warburg wrote to me lately that things were so bad in Germany that nothing could be done.” The President threw up his hands as if to say, “Well, if Max thinks nothing can be done, then nothing can be done.’”

pp 110 – Steven Wise circulated, in January 1937, an internal memorandum to the Governing Councils in the World Jewish Congress making it clear;

“in the most emphatic terms that it cannot be a party to any scheme of the Polish government which looks to a place for Polish-German emigrants.”

pp 113 – At the same time, he circulated this memorandum, he wrote to a New York congressman who intended to introduce legislation to ease restrictions on emigration to America:

“I have every reason to believe that any effort that is made at this time to ease the immigration laws will result in a serious wave of anti-semitic feeling in this country.”

pp 120 – After [the suggestion that *(nj)] Austria fell, Wise met with representatives of the American Jewish Committee and some non-Jewish groups. The meeting came in the wake of an attempt by New York Congressman, Samuel Dickstein, to introduce legislation that would allow unused refugee ‘quotas’ to be allocated to those leaving Germany. The gathered agreed unanimously:

“The organizations represented at the conference will take the position that the proposed legislation is inadvisable.”

pp 128 – In the week following Kristallnacht [false flag *(nj)], the British offered to give up most of the 65,000 quota for British citizens to emigrate to the United States to increase places for Jewish refugees instead.
Under Secretary Of State Sumner Welles responded:

“I reminded the Ambassador that the President stated there was no intention on the part of his government to increase the quota for German nationals. I added that it was my strong impression that the responsible leaders among American Jews would be the first to urge that no change in the present quota for German Jews be made.”

The influential Samuel Rosenman (Roosevelt’s Speech-writer), one of the “responsible” Jewish leaders sent Roosevelt a memorandum telling him that…

“…an increase of quotas is wholly inadvisable. It will merely produce a ‘Jewish problem’ in the countries increasing the quota.”

pp 129 – The General Jewish Council (established by the B’nai B’rith, JLC and AJC in 1938) met the following day and spent hours of debate on an agenda, which did not include the Kristallnacht. When the leaders of the American Jewish Congress addressed the issue, they did so by adopting a resolution giving the following advice to their constituents across the country:

“Resolved that it is the present policy of the ‘General Jewish Council’ that there should be no parades, public demonstrations or protests by Jews.”

Stephen Wise, on American Jewish Congress stationary, sent out a report to his members labeled:

“In behalf of the American Jewish Congress I send you this report clarifying our policy in meeting the present crisis in the life of our fellow Jews in Germany. The silence of the American Jewish Congress should not be regarded as a lack of activity on our part. It is the result of well considered policy.”

pp 145 – In the wake of Kristallnacht, New York Senator [Robert F.] Wagner introduced legislation to allow 20,000 German Jewish children into the United States. Stephen Wise testified before the legislation committee:

“If there is any conflict between our duty to those children and our duty to our country, our country comes first; and if children cannot be helped, they cannot be helped.”
(Reynolds saw no difficulty in accommodating the children in the United States. The legislation, without support from the Jewish leadership, got nowhere.)

If the children were not destined from Germany to Palestine, they were not destined to live. The same thing happened when choosing the Polish Jews fit to live/emigrate.

pp 154 – A letter to American Jews on United Jewish Appeal (established 1939) stationery continued to support the ‘selected‘ immigration of Jews to Palestine, despite the fact that approximately 2.5 – 3 million Jews were [partly] in the reclaimed German territory and Jewish-Bolshevik/Soviet occupied east Poland:

“Selectivity is an inescapable factor in dealing with the problem of immigration to Palestine. By selectivity is meant the choice of young men and women who are trained in either agriculture or industry.”
[note: as Palestinian villagers were being slaughtered (for settler replacement), there was a need for extra labour to till the fields. Other tactics such as false flag terrorist attacks in surrounding Arab nations were used to fear Middle Eastern Jews into relocating to Palestine, predominantly, Iraqi Jews, while blaming the attacks on their Muslim countrymen]

pp 178 – During the summer of 1942, Gerhart Riegner purportedly sent a cable to the State Department detailing the [alleged] German plan for exterminating European Jewry. At the behest of Under Secretary Of State, Sumner Welles (who was forced to resign in 1943, after Homosexual misconduct), Wise apparently didn’t tell anyone.

pp 187- In the February, 1943 issue of Wise’s American Jewish Congress publication, Opinion, there is an extensive review of the Hitler era to date, with articles contributed by 52 people. No one mentioned the word ‘rescue.’

pp 200 – When Anthony Eden (Deputy Prime Minister to Winston Churchill), was in Washington he met with Wise and told him nothing could be done…Eden’s private secretary Oliver Harvey noted in his diary:

“Unfortunately, A.E. loves Arabs and hates Jews.”

pp 212 – There was an appeal from Italy which stated that an appeal from the pope might stop the deportation of Jews from Italy. The Zionist Emergency Committee did nothing about this matter. A meeting wasn’t even called.

pp 217 – Stephen Wise declared:

“We are Americans first. Nothing else that we are, whether by faith or race, qualifies our Americanism…The way to save Jews, is to unite the Jewish people behind the victory program of President Roosevelt.”

However, in 1933, Rabbi Wise said:

“I am not an American citizen of Jewish faith. I am a Jew. I have been an American for sixty-three years, but I have been a Jew for 4000 years.”

pp 220 – A White House staffer recorded in his diary that,

“The President told us from his bedroom that he would not see the delegation of rabbis.”

Judge [Samuel] Rosenman (Roosevelt’s Speech-writer), who was also in the bedroom, said the group was not representative of the most thoughtful elements in Jewry. Rosenman’s statement to Roosevelt that…

“leading Jews of his acquaintance’ opposed the rabbis’ march.”


Rabbi Weizs psychologically riling up the the public over alleged ‘Jewish Persecution’ while never acting in any political capacity

pp 227 – While Wise sent private memos clearly stating they thought the migration of Jews was possible…in public they supported the Roosevelt administration’s steadfast assertion that apparently “Nothing could be done.”

pp 230 – Congressman Gillette recalled a visit to his office by Wise and a few of his colleagues:

“None of these gentlemen seemed to be enthusiastic for…the saving of the remnant of the Jewish people.”

pp 241 – Wise felt strongly that the Gillette legislation did not provide for the “proper type of commission.” With all that was known about the obstruction of the Jewish rescue by the State Department, Wise was lobbying to leave the issue in their hands…

Henry Morgenthau’s (Secretary of the Treasury) aide, Josiah Dubois (who played a major role in exposing governmental obstructions…), uncovered the State Department’s policy relevant to the issue of Jewish rescue…
The stunning title to the Dubois memorandum was:


Dubois pointed to the restrictions on visas as;

“the most glaring example of the use of the machinery of this government to actually prevent the rescue of Jews.”

pp 270 – The Roosevelt administration took the usual position that there be no special effort for Jewish refugees. Stephen Wise also saw no human course of action:

“The issue is in the hands of God.”


The Sabbatean Jewish leadership had no interest in improving conditions of any Jew, unless they wanted to go to the proposed new ‘Jewish State’ – those who did not, still served the ‘Persecution’ narrative.

Barry Chamish stated with anger,
“Any Jew who got on a boat, on a ship from Germany to anywhere in the world, the word was out diplomatically everywhere:
‘If that ship isn’t going to ‘Palestine’, you send these Jews back to their death.’ Worldwide! Ship after ship!. Every country! They don’t escape. They don’t like Palestine, they die!

David Morrison’s conclusions are too generous and slanted by the belief that the [only] 210,000 Jews in Germany were actually being deliberately persecuted (which was rejected by German-Jews themselves), but his scholarship is invaluable. He has added an essential contribution to the indisputable fact that America’s Jewish leaders, led by Stephen Wise (Weizs), purposely persecuted by proxy – through international hysteria propaganda – the Jews of western-destroyed Europe, in order to steer them to Palestine for the intention to establish the future impunitive State of Israel.


“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish State in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university of budding crooks.”
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

weizmann1Chaim Weitzman stated in a 1907 speech;
“The governments of the world will pay attention to us, only as they will ‘become convinced’ that we are capable of ‘Conquering Palestine’ through persistent practical work.
Political Zionism means, to make the ‘Jewish Question’ an ‘International Question.’ It means going to the nations and saying to them: “We need your help to achieve our aim; but we ourselves are doing all in our power to strengthen our position in the land, because we regard Palestine as our homeland.” We must explain Zionism to the governments in such a manner that they shall understand it as the Jews understand it.”
How the Palestinians understand it, was not proffered at all.


Rabbi Stephen Wise

Feature picture above: Rabbi Stephen Wise (Weizs), Austro-Hungarian Jewish immigrant to the US, both son and grandson to Rabbi’s, established the Free Synagogue movement, founded the NY Federation of Zionist Societies which led FAZ (Federation of American Zionists) and onto the Zionist Organisation of America and, he was President of the World Jewish Congress.

In 1893, Rabbi Weiz was appointed assistant to Rabbi Henry S. Jacobs of the Congregation B’nai Jeshurun, New York City, and later in the same year, minister to the same congregation. In 1900, he launched his career as the rabbi of Congregation Beth Israel in Portland, Oregon; typical of the activists of the Progressive Era, he attacked “many of the social and political ills of contemporary America.” In 1906, concerning another rabbinical appointment, Wise made a major break with the established Reform movement over the “question whether the pulpit shall be free or whether the pulpit shall not be free, and, by reason of its loss of freedom, reft of its power for good”; in 1907 he established his Free Synagogue, starting the “Free Synagogue” movement.

The Rabbi was an early supporter of Zionism, and his support for, and commitment to Political Zionism was very atypical of Reform Judaism, which was historically and decidedly non-Zionist since the Pittsburgh Platform in 1885. He was a founder of the New York Federation of Zionist Societies in 1897, which led in the formation of the national Federation of American Zionists (FAZ), a forerunner of the Zionist Organization of America. At the Second Zionist Congress (Basel, 1898), he was a delegate and secretary for the English language. Weizs served as honorary secretary of FAZ, in close cooperation with Theodor Herzl (“Father of Zionism”) until the latter’s death in 1904.

Weizs, joining U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and others laid the groundwork for a democratically elected nationwide organization of ‘ardently Zionist’ Jews, ‘to represent Jews as a group and not as individuals’. In 1918, following national elections, this Jewish community convened the first American Jewish Congress in Philadelphia’s historic Independence Hall.

In 1902, Weizs officiated as first vice-president of the Oregon State Conference of Charities and Correction. In 1903 he was appointed Commissioner of Child Labor for the State of Oregon, and founded the Peoples’ Forum of Oregon. These activities initiated a lifelong commitment to Jewish issues, stemming from his embrace of a variety of Jewish Zionist movements.

In keeping with the progression of Cultural Marxism, in 1914, Weizs co-founded the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). In A History of Jews in America, historian Howard Sachar wrote, “In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise (Weizs).” Other Jewish co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch.

Louise Waterman Weizs, Jewish activist and wife of World Jewish Congress President Stephen Samuel Wise, addressing the War Emergency Conference of the WJC in Atlantic City in 1944

In 1922, Weiz founded the Jewish Institute of Religion, an educational center in New York City to train rabbis in Reform Judaism. It was merged into the Hebrew Union College a year after his death. In 1922 Weizs was one of the founding trustees of the Palestine Endowment Funds, Inc., along with Julian Mack.

When the Federation of American Zionists (FAZ) was originally established, Weizs was appointed the position of Secretary. After the organisation transformed into the Zionist Organisation of America, Rabbi Wise fulfilled positions as both President and Vice President during his lifetime.

Rabbi Weizs was President Franklin D. Roosevelt personal adviser and led his think tank (along with many of his other kinsmen). FDR turned to Mr Weizs before making any decisions concerning Jewish matters (and others), which included all of WWII. In addition, Weizs was also adviser to previous President Wilson.


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.


The Jewish Question? Why a “Solution” to a “Question” – or was it a “Problem”?

Who coined the term, what is the historically enduring question and why is there a need of a question?

The ‘Jewish Question’ first became a political topic in Great Britain around 1750, initially intended to be a neutral expression to create political thought and discussion, regarding the continual negative attitude toward Jews, who were persistently surrounded by historical friction, from a national, ethical, religious, political and legal view-point, to which a ‘Solution’ needed to be sought.


Hopkinsville Kentuckian, September 4, 1913

The styled slogan of it being a ‘Question’ was a political and linguistic approach to address what was actually an incessant ‘Problem.’ A ‘Question’ provokes an ‘Answer’ – a ‘Solution’ is only ever in direct response to a ‘Problem’ – in this case, ‘The Jewish Problem.’ Unless it is, of course, manipulation of a Problem-Reaction-Solution, in which case, ‘Who Benefits’, then indicates who or what is behind the deliberate cause of any political problem.
The histories of Jewish emancipation and the canard of European Anti-Semitism are filled with a great variety of proffered “Solutions to the Jewish Question.”

220px-Bruno_BauerFrom 1750’s Great Britain, the Question was next discussed in France – ‘la question juive’ – after the French Revolution in 1789, before arriving in Germany via Bruno Bauer’s treatise “Die Judenfrage” (The Jewish Question).
From that point hundreds of tractates, pamphlets, newspaper articles and books were written on the subject, with many offering ‘Solutions’ to the ‘Problem’ including resettlement, deportation and assimilation of the Jewish population. Similarly, yet out-weighing in abundance, hundreds of pieces of literature were actually written by Jewish intellectuals themselves, whom, opposing these solutions and, although having offered solutions such as integration and education, the most favourable solution  to meet these sub-solutions, was complete freedom in all civic positions in order to administer them.

This debate, however, ultimately resulted in confusion at not being able to ascertain whether the problem of the ‘Jewish Question’ had more to do with the problems posed by the German Jews themselves, or their opponents? Was it ‘Anti-Semitism’ or ‘Anti-Gentilism’?

From around 1860, under the newly coined description to the historical problem, Jews were described as a stumbling block to the identity and cohesion of the German nation and as enemies within the Germans’ own country. The Question was declared by many as a racial ideology and cultural problem, unsolvable through integration and that the removal of Jews from their over-representation and socially dominant positions, of the press, education, culture, state politics and economy, was necessary to restore ethical and cultural balance back into the lives of the German people.

12163827392An early use of the expression “Jewish question” appeared during the ‘Jew Bill of 1753’ debates in England, though not yet a political slogan. It was formally called; The Jewish Naturalisation Act – 1753.
Joseph Salvador, a prominent Banker and leader of London’s Sephardi Jewish community, petitioned the government for legislation to enact a wide range of accommodations for foreign and local Jews, financial benefits for the higher classes being dominant… The contradictions within the petition and the legal implications, left puzzled those who debated it and wondering what was the true intent behind the Bill itself, as it would open up further hostilities toward Jewry. This was a foreign concept to the XVIII century Christian mind, which could not understand the intentional purpose – and ultimate benefit – of civil unrest and political chaos.

Although the Bill passed, it was hurriedly repealed a few months later, citing; “Wherein the motives of all parties interested therein are examined: the principles of Christianity, with regard to the admission of Jews are fully discussed […] Wherein the false reasoning, gross misrepresentation of fact and Perversions of Scripture, are fully laid open and detected.” It was colloquially termed an “Abandonment of Christianity.”

Bruno Bauer, in his book; ‘The Jewish Question’ published in 1843, argued that Jews could achieve political emancipation, only if they relinquished their particular religious consciousness, since political emancipation requires a secular state, which he assumed did not leave any “space” for social identities such as religion. True political emancipation, for Bauer, required the abolition of religion.

karl-marx-on-the-jewish-questionMordechai Levi ( better-known as Karl Marx), replied to Bauer in his 1844 essay titled, On the Jewish Question.’ Marx contradicted Bauer’s view that the nature of the Jewish religion prevented Judaism’s assimilation. Instead, he focused on the specific social and economic role of the Jewish group in Europe which, according to Marx, was lost when capitalism, the “material basis for Judaism,” assimilated the European societies as a whole.
Marx argued, that Bauer was mistaken in his assumption that in a ‘secular state’, religion would no longer play a prominent role in social life. In Marx’s analysis, the ‘secular state’ is not opposed to religion, but rather actually presupposes it.

After a century of political discussion, the abundance of printed material disseminated into the psyche of the newly-literate populations of Europe, along with the Jewish Enlightenment movement (Haskalah) and, a succession of Revolutions, the progression of the Question expansively grew into an international geopolitical question, from its initial discussions on mere internal, civic issues.

herzlthTheodore Herzl, stated in his  1896 pamphlet, ‘Der Judenstaat’ (The Jews’ State);
“The ‘Jewish Question’ persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the ‘Jewish Question’ is not solved on the political level.”

The ‘British Uganda Programme’ or, the ‘Uganda Scheme,’ was a plan in the early 1900s to give a portion of British East Africa to the Jewish people as a homeland. The idea was brought to the Zionist Congress at its sixth meeting in 1903, at Basel. There a fierce debate ensued. The African land was described as an “ante-chamber to the Holy Land” and a Nachtasyl (temporary night shelter), and many felt that accepting the offer would make it more difficult to establish a Jewish State in Palestine and, also that the Jewish nation would not be able to claim itself as native to the land of Africa. Before the vote on the matter, the Jewish-Russian delegation stormed out in opposition. According to Author, Zionist, later Territorialist and close associate of Theodore Herlz – Israel Zangwill, who, as President of the International Jewish Territorial Organisation, stated during his address at the annual Vienna Conference, that; “the gradual abandonment of the [Uganda] project, [was] partly from the fear that our neo-Jewish civilisation, would be based on black labour.”

The Uganda Debate is still used as a metaphor in present-day Israeli politics. Israeli occupiers place supreme importance on settling in the Biblically-hallowed Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and some have used the term “Latter-Day Ugandists” to describe others who are willing to accept a Jewish state based on the 1947 United Nations plan or, the 1949 Armistice Agreements (excluding the West Bank). This term implies that liberal Israelis—like the adherents of the Uganda Programme or Latter-Day Ugandists, are simply interested in a place where Jews can live in peace, and care little about supposed historical and/or biblical matters.

weizmann1Chaim Weizman (first President of Israel) stated in a 1907 speech;
“The governments of the world will pay attention to us, only as they will ‘become convinced’ that we are capable of ‘Conquering Palestine’ through persistent practical work.
Political Zionism means, to make the ‘Jewish Question’ an ‘International Question.’ It means going to the nations and saying to them: “We need your help to achieve our aim; but we ourselves are doing all in our power to strengthen our position in the land, because we regard Palestine as our homeland.” We must explain Zionism to the governments in such a manner that they shall understand it as the Jews understand it.”
How the Palestinians understand it, was not proffered at all.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-2006-1009-500,_Archim_GerckeIn National Socialist Germany, the term “Jewish Question” (Judenfrage) referred to the sense that the existence of Jews in Germany had posed great problems for the nation, especially well-founded since the 1848 Revolution, the 1918 Revolution, the 1919 Communist-Spartacist Uprising, the repeated and deliberate economic crashes and escalated problems, moreover, since the Treaty of Versailles. In 1933 – the same year International Jewry Declared War on Germany – theorists Johann von Leers and Achim Gercke, both proposed that this particular Jewish problem and, the Jewish Question over all, could be solved most humanely by resettling Jews in Madagascar or elsewhere in Africa. Both intellectuals discussed the pros and cons of supporting the German Zionist Jews as well, but von Leers asserted that establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine would create humanitarian and political problems for the region. This percipient prediction has since been proven so, since The Benefit of WWII, led to the establishment of a Jewish [Terrorist] State in Palestine, which has caused the region to be consumed with wars, terrorism, genocide and chaos, ever since.

AlfredRosenberginBerlinThese theories were expanded on and proposed to the International Refugee Committee (today, International Rescue Committee), between National Socialist representative, Alfred Rosenberg, IRC Director George Rublee and other international delegates.
Rosenberg reflected on all possible proposals and after a process of elimination, such as rejecting Alaska – as it offered too harsh a climate – proposed Guiana or Madagascar, as both had been officially offered by other governments prior.
Opposing a Jewish ‘Reservation’ in Palestine, Rosenberg said it was too small and experience had shown that the British Mandate Government of Palestine could not come to agreement with the Arabs. Further he asserted, that the territory should be set aside with contributions by “Jewish Millionaires and billionaires from all the world,” to the International Refugee Committee in London. Supervision of the ‘Reservation’ by a police administration under the command of a Governor or a League of Nations was also an important recommendation by Rosenberg.
He added, “If the democracies want to prove the truth of their friendship for Jews now, they must within a reasonable time make clear, which of these territories shall be established as a Jewish Reservation.”
“I stress the word “Reservation” for there can be no talk either at present or in the future about a Jewish-State…” Rosenberg said.


After nearly two centuries of progressive political manoeuvring, debates, revolutions and the overthrow of Autocratic political systems (except the short revival in the Third Reich) that could not have their policies rapidly manipulated by infiltration, like Democracy caters to (WWI – the final implosion of the old world Autocratic systems; German, Russian, Austria-Hungary and Ottoman Empires) and before the world could examine the economic, political and social systems of Germany that brought it such prosperity – while the rest of the world suffered the Depression – the time was ripe for the finalè to establish a new world capital and a state of eternal Jewish impunity from accountability… and the mother of all excuses and political sympathy was required for this purpose – a travesty – a Holocaust!
It was make-or-break and no Atrocity Propaganda was neglected, because a Nachtasyl would never be acceptable.

The Final Solution: Germany’s Madagascar Resettlement Plan – see here


“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish State in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university of budding crooks.”
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

The only “Questions” that should be accurately answered and absent of fanciful theories of unfounded prejudice is…

Why hasn’t there been a persistent;
“Asian Question”
“Indian Question”
“African Question”
“European Question”
“Arab Question”
“Aboriginal Question”
“Polynesian Question”
“Spanish Question” or
“All other peoples Question”
just the “Jewish Problem”?

And now, we have an additional modern day Question/Problem to find a ‘Solution’ for…
How do we hold criminals accountable, now that a ‘Jurisdictional-State [of Impunity]’ has been established, as a safe-haven for criminals to shelter and to retreat to?

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic

The Katyn Forest Massacre – Committed by Jewish Communists or Germans?

The Katyn Forest Massacre

The below video, narrated by Dr. William Pierce, exposes the coordinated maneuvers by the allied nations, to throw Europe into chaotic war, communism and genocide, while to the world, their propaganda was blaming it on those who were trying to prevent it.

The Katyn Forest Massacre, was the mass murder of at least 15,000 to 22,000 ethnic Polish Officers, dignitaries, intellectuals and other community leaders, by the Jewish Soviet Communists and their NKVD.
German soldiers were informed about the mass killings by local Russians. They searched the location and after discovery of the many corpses, German officials brought in investigators from various, purportedly neutral nations and the IRC, to ascertain who the victims were and who had carried out the massacre.



It was ‘Proven’ that they were among the approximately 22,000 ethnic Poles missing from Soviet occupied Poland and other documentation found on the bodies (newspapers, diaries, winter clothing etc), showed that they were in Soviet Russia and the Jewish-Bolshevik death camps prior to their murders.



Although all evidence indicated the Jewish Bolsheviks guilt of these killings, the Jewish newspapers reported to the world, that it was yet another crime conducted by “Evil Germans.”
Further, even though today it is now an established fact in historical records, that this massacre was carried out by the Jewish Bolsheviks NKVD, not one government, Jewish paper or obscure article has ever conceded their criminal defamatory error and, not so much as an apology was ever given to the Germans for this international crime… nor has anyone been charged for this war crime and crime against humanity, except for the hanging of 7 innocent German men;

K.H. Strueffling,
H. Remlinger,
E. Böhom,
E. Sommerfeld,
H. Jannike,
E. Skotki; and,
E. Geherer

Three other innocent German men were sentenced to 20 years labour in the Jewish Gulag system;

E.P. Vogel,
F. Wiese; and,
A. Diere…

… they were never to be seen again!
Yet another result of purported Justice from the Nuremberg Show Trials. In fact, those who sat in the position of Prosecution against these innocent German men at Nuremberg, were the Soviet Officials responsible for this crime (and many others), in the biggest display of Conflict of Interest the world has ever been subjected to!

Following numerous Soviet excuses and pretended searches, the British and American authorities both knew of Soviet responsibility by the time the Nuremberg Tribunals were held. The alleged evidence of Hearsay excerpts read allowed – yet with no present witnesses – from unsigned documents with no letterheads, purporting to be reports of Forensic examinations and, the charges of German guilt brought at the IMT, placed the British and American Governments, along with the whole Tribunal itself, in an intensely difficult position. Relations with the Polish Government-in-Exile were strained and to have acquitted Göring and the other IMT defendants of this crime, would have implied that the Jewish-Soviets were in fact guilty… but they shared the bench as Prosecution!
To find them guilty of this crime, would have imploded the whole post-war proceedings and exposed the IMT as the illegitimate Show Trial that it was… this would not be tolerated at any cost.

Investigative Documentary held in the U.S. National Archives

Today, according to the C.I.A.;

“Official records, opened in 1990 when glasnost was still in vogue, show that Stalin had every intention of treating the Poles as political prisoners. Just two days after the [Soviet] invasion [of Poland] began on 17 September, the NKVD created a Directorate of Prisoners of War. It took custody of Polish prisoners from the Army and began organizing a network of ‘Reception Centers’ and transfer camps and arranging rail transport to the western USSR. Once there, the Poles were placed in “special” (concentration) camps, where, from October to February, they were subjected to lengthy interrogations and constant political agitation. The camps were at Kozelsk, Starobelsk and Ostashkov, all three located on the grounds of seized Orthodox monasteries, converted into prisons. The NKVD dispatched one of its rising stars, Major Vassili Zarubin, to Kozelsk, where most of the officers were kept, to conduct interviews. Zarubin presented himself to the Poles as a charming, sympathetic, and cultured Soviet official, which led many prisoners into sharing confidences that would cost them their lives.”

“During April-May 1940, the Polish prisoners were moved from their internment camps and taken to three execution sites. The place most identified with the Soviet atrocity is Katyn Forest, located 12 miles west of Smolensk, Russia. For years historians assumed that the grounds of an NKVD rest and recreation facility were both an execution and burial site for nearly a fifth of the unfortunate Poles who found themselves in Soviet captivity. Post-Cold War revelations, however, suggest that the victims were shot in the basement of the NKVD headquarters in Smolensk and at an abattoir in the same city, although some may have been executed at a site in the forest itself. In any event, the Katyn Forest is–and will probably long remain–the main symbol of the atrocity, even if it was not the actual killing field.” […]
“Despite overwhelming evidence of Soviet responsibility, Moscow blamed the Germans, and for the rest of the war, Washington and London officially accepted the Soviet counter-charge (from the Germans). When the Polish government-in-exile in London demanded an international inquiry, Stalin used this as a pretext to break relations. The Western allies objected but eventually acquiesced. Soon thereafter, the Soviet dictator assembled a group of Polish Communists that returned to Poland with the Red Army in 1944 and formed the nucleus of the postwar government.

“Those who died at Katyn included an admiral, two generals, 24 colonels, 79 lieutenant colonels, 258 majors, 654 captains, 17 naval captains, 3,420 NCOs, seven chaplains, three landowners, a prince, 43 officials, 85 privates, and 131 refugees. Also among the dead were 20 university professors; 300 physicians; several hundred lawyers, engineers, and teachers; and more than 100 writers and journalists as well as about 200 pilots. It was their social status that landed them in front of NKVD execution squads. Most of the victims were reservists who had been mobilized when Germany invaded. In all, the NKVD eliminated almost half the Polish officer corps–part of Stalin’s long-range effort to prevent the resurgence of an independent Poland.”

Documents show Stalin signed Katyn death warrants

Although the documents have been available to a handful of researchers since 1992, since the fall of the Soviet Union, it took nearly 20 years for the general public to be given access to the files which concern the 1940 Katyn massacre.

The sight of Stalin’s signature, on what amounts to a collective death warrant, quells decades of debate on the massacre and gives the lie to claims by die-hard Stalinist’s, that their idol did not personally sanction the killings.

The files catalogue the chilling decision-making process that culminated in Stalin and his Jewish-henchmen approving the execution of 21,587 unarmed Poles, in 1940.
One of the documents made public is a note from Lavrentiy Beria, the head of the NKVD, to Stalin about the fate of the Poles. Beria proposes that the NKVD “quickly examine the use of the highest means of punishment – death by shooting.” Stalin’s signature and a red stamp reading “Top Secret” are on the first page of the document, which is dated March 1940. Another document, a secret internal Soviet Communist party memo from 1965, refers to “what was formerly Bourgeois Poland” and warns against any public disclosure, arguing that the documents have no historical value.

Memorandum with an NKVD letterhead from Lavrentiy Beria to “Comrade Stalin” proposing to execute captured Polish officers, soldiers and other prisoners by shooting. Stalin’s handwritten signature appears on top, followed by signatures of Politburo members; Kliment Voroshilov, Vyacheslav Molotov and Anastas Mikoyan. Signatures in left margin – Mikhail Kalinin and Lazar Kaganovich, both favouring mass execution.

For an English-translated list of all Politburo correspondence regarding the execution of Polish Officers, police, former landowners and other dignitaries – including the deportation by cattle-car and ten year imprisonment in forced labour death-camps ,of 75,000 – 100,000 of their family members (wives, children and parents) – see Katyn – Siberia_Documents_1939 – 1940_pdf

Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says:

“Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe. It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia.
If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries. Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps.
President Roosevelt has been given the power to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war, which the Jews are deliberately heading for.”

(Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World, vol 3, pp 372-374.)

In a 1976 interview with Harold Rosenthal, top Administrative Aide to US Senator Jacob Javits, said the following when discussing the Jewish usurpation of Russia…

“It is an established rule to destroy all members of pre-existing government, their families and relatives, but never Jews. We destroy all members of the police, state police, army officers and their families, but never Jews.
You see, we know when a government begins to search for the Communists within its borders, they are really attempting to uncover Jews in their area. We’re not fooled!”

Dr William Pierce, summarises the machinations of the calculated plans, slogans and crimes by the allies and Jewish media in this short presentation:

More massacres of ethnic Europeans by the Jewish Bolsheviks
(click through to watch on YouTube)





A single shot to the back of the head/neck and hands tied behind the back, was the NKVD training and method for execution

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.


Thou Shalt Not Allow Another Nationalism Than Ours

Thou Shalt Not Allow Another Nationalism Than Ours

During the rise of the Third Reich, not only did the Jewish El-ites and their tribalistic minions lose their grip on a country they once wielded great power from – corrupting within and disseminating chaos without – the rise of the Third Reich was something much worse than losing power over Germany, to the International Jew…

After a few centuries or so of Jewish movements and literature convincing and agitating the masses in all nations with [the very ideological weapon they’d used for all their previous revolutions and still, for ensuing revolutions], that of the manipulated “CLASS-WARFARE” – riling the working class against the capitalists (and letting die or killing those who were neither – they were of no use to them), while ensuring their own Capitalists would be immune and remain in power, to funnel all the capital to themselves by consolidation and credit recall, actually increasing their power and capital, by using their Marxist inspired, Communistic created movement of ‘Proletariat against the [very] Bourgeois’ they sought to supplant (divide and conquer), by replacing them as the Super-Bourgeoisie (with the help of the naive angry mob), thereby, reducing all others to slaves – or in Russia, the so-called ‘Workers Paradise‘ – ruled over by the only Nationalism they planned (and still plan) to exist – that of ‘Jewish-Nationalism’…


However, there emerged a Nationalism that demonstrated and proved, in only a few short years, that this clash of classes that the communist narrative had pushed for so long, was NOT inevitable!

A Nationalism that abolished Class-Warfare (and useless political ‘Parties’), uniting peasant and professional in community pride, in dignity, in respect for each other, in commonality and in quality over quantity. A Nationalism that enabled a form of capitalism that pursued quality of life in every area for all, raising the standard of living and morality through a willing collective effort – contributionism, not theft, give not take, based on the timeless principle of, “Give and thy shall receive.” The very Proletarian unification and recognition Marx and his Communist herd opined about… but when the true recognition of the Proletariat worth ACTUALLY emerged, they did all they could to destroy it.

A Nationalism that abolished the form of Capitalism brought about by lazy, scheming, usurious extraction – the theft of all assets and capital through unpaid [imposed] debt. A Nationalism which inspired value in each other, making obsolete the idiotic idea of seeing value in an inanimate metal locked away in some Bankers vault. A model of Nationalism the whole world could adopt and hoped the world would adopt, which supports the ‘Natural-Order‘ of TRUE Diversity – the Diversity BETWEEN Nations (not WITHIN Nations)… and thus, this is why every other Nation had to be bombarded with the twisted and most evil of horror stories against this Nationalism – one of barbarous world domination, evoking distrust and persecution against all Germans whichever land they resided in (whilst crying this was their own plight), before the other nations, too, took pride in their own and each country established their own free nationalism, embodied by respect and rights for everyone, within and without, their own cultural lands…

In the mind of the Jew, anything that stood in contrast or stood above ‘Jewish Nationalism’ or simply competed, had to be destroyed at all costs! The threat of the potential of many unified nations to rise near their superiority nationalism (a special Chosen People), would not be tolerated!

ww2-anti-german-propaganda-poster-illustrating-a-demonic-adolf-hitler-DK18NTThe Third Reich’s National Socialism was the initiator of that contrasting Nationalism that had to be destroyed; and all weapons were employed to achieve it – international defamatory press, finance, policy, plundering, war machines, slavery and outright genocide.

‘Jewish Nationalism’ is the core drive behind their endless names of movements and organisations, the compass of their instinct, from every word they utter, to every piece of literature or policy written… thus why the Third Reich’s principle of Nationalism will continue to be demonised as long as one of these nepotistic tribalists can still speak.

Their unnecessary manipulated ‘Class-Warfare’ must never be discovered by the angry mob, it has been the very weapon they’ve used to raise the masses in every incremental revolutionary phase of societal-restructuring they’ve pursued, the very weapon that today keeps the aimless and divided “Democracies” in useless conflicting discussion and opinions, absent of unified direction and action… thereby incapacitating any possibility of opposing Nationalisms to the jew, enabling ‘Jewish-Nationalism‘ of their own unified direction and action, to reign supreme… their very own ‘Internationalism’ (world domination over all nations/nationalism’s), the internationalism, which was born from Diaspora Judaism and incubated in the isolating banishment of ghettos.

Hitler’s Economic Reform:



 N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.