Book-Burning and All-lied Book Destruction Compared


For all the readily available information about the infamous ‘Nazi Book Burnings’, next to nothing is mentioned of a far greater book burning; that which transpired during the Allied Obliteration Bombing campaign upon Germany and the ‘Re-Education’ program of  any surviving Germans after their defeat and following occupation… which still continues to this day.

The so-called Book-Burning Policy of Germany

We have all heard about the so-called brainwashing German’s purported evil ‘Book Burning’, but there was never any official National Socialist policy to undertake such action. In fact, Chancellor Hitler did not learn of the May 1933 fire until after the first blaze, which was ignited by students.

The German Student Union did call for German university students to purge literature of Marxist influence and to RESTORE the aspects of German culture to their previous volkische traditions, before the degenerate Communist influence prevailed during the Weimar Republic.
The Theses included such detail as;

  • “Language and literature have their roots in the Folk. It is the German Folk’s responsibility to assure that its language and literature are the pure and unadulterated expression of its Folk traditions.
  • At present there is a chasm between literature and German tradition. This situation is a disgrace.
  • Purity of language and literature is your responsibility. Your Folk has entrusted you with the duty of faithfully preserving your language.
  • We want to eradicate lies, we want to denounce treason, we want institutions of discipline and political education for US THE STUDENTS, not MINDLESSNESS.
  • We demand of the German students the desire and capability for independent knowledge and decisions.
  • We demand of German students the desire and capability to overcome Jewish intellectualism and the resulting ‘liberal decay’ in the German spirit.”

With todays liberal societal mindset, which has resulted from the same Marxist incrementalism, this may be perceived as abhorrent and apparently ‘Racist.’ However, to understand the reasoning for such a call, one must understand what had evolved in Germany within the years from the Treaty of Versailles 1919, to 1933.

From the ‘Back-stabbing’ of Germany by International Jewry – the arbitrary annexation of German people, land and industry to surrounding states, the impossible WWI Reparations imposed on the German people and the purposeful hyperinflation – plunged Germany and her Volksdeutsche into incomprehensible poverty, suffering, starvation, death, immorality and desperation… all while a special few lived it up at their expense, in their homes and property, as they took new positions of power and influence of the newly imposed Republic (through the International Democratic overthrow of the former Autocratic Reich), taking over all business, finance and industry, with which they promoted promiscuity, pornography, bestiality, homosexuality, paedophilia, drugs and the sex trade, all through Jewish owned medical clinics, clubs, theatres and publications.
After years of deprivation, suffering and starvation, much of the German Volksdeutsche had succumbed to the Marxist demoralisation, through an environment of pure debauchery and the desperation of the ‘have-nots.’ Germany and, in particular, Berlin, had become the cesspit capital of Europe. To cleanse the German nation of such decadence as this, is what was evil, according to the Glorious All-lied Victors.

That all changed in 1933, when German property, business, finance, production, position, education, industry and publications were rightfully PUT BACK into indigenous Germans hands… for their own benefit.

[Note the Narrator states “Legend has it” regarding Goebbels’ alleged order to burn books]

All-lied deletion of German History, Culture and Traditional Spirit

DresdenIt is estimated that 11,075,000 [*] volumes and patents, which is over a third of all German books, had already been destroyed by the Allied barbarous aerial bombing in West Germany alone; and this does not include those in the areas taken from Germany after the war. Added to the millions of German books destroyed worldwide during the anti-German hysteria of WWI and the Jewish Boycott against Germany in 1933, far more German books were destroyed in the twentieth century, than exist today.
[*] (Source: UNESCO, General Information Programme and UNISIST, ‘Lost Memory – Libraries and Archives Destroyed in the Twentieth Century’)

Librorum ProhibitorumUntil the advent of the printing press, books were hand-scribed and existed in only one or a few copies. Burning them ensured that no one would ever read them… needless to say, thought control was simple pre-printing days.
However, citing rhetoric such as “Preventing corruption of the young” (ironically and hypocritically, a concept often cited in the German censorship laws today), the likes of Henry VIII required printers to submit all manuscripts to the Church for approval and imported publications were outlawed in 1529. French king Francis I, prohibited printing in 1535 and in 1559, the Catholic Church issued the Librorum Prohibitorum to order censors as to which publications to allow. Their approved index listed only 5,000 titles which existed right up until 1966.
Germany however, still had much of the hand-scribed books from its historical culture, but through the atrocious terror bombing of civilian cities by allied forces, they are lost forever;
But it didn’t stop there…

We might think those days were long behind a progressive society, but not under certain circumstances; and, ‘Re-education’ of Germans is and was one such circumstance.

The Allied consensus upon victory was the doctrine of collective guilt: all Germans, young or old, shared the blame for the war. The idea was entrenched enough that it caused no surprise when U.S. President, Harry S. Truman, refused to alleviate the famine of the German population in December, 1945, stating;

Starving German child

“Though all Germans might not be guilty for the war, it would be too difficult to try to single out for better treatment those who had nothing to do with the Nazi regime and its crimes.”
Apparently this even applied to babies and young children.

Morgenthau Plan

All German literature found in both the Soviet and Western Occupation Zones was subjected to censorship. In the U.S. zone, it was regulated by occupation directive JCS 1067 (The Morgenthau Plan) until July 1947, and in May 1946, the order was valid for all zones.

“Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place – that only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization.”
~ President Franklin D. Roosevelt, August, 1944.

Allied Control Authority Order No. 4 stated:
“Confiscation of Literature and Material of a Nazi and Militarist Nature” dictated that all confiscated literature was reduced to pulp instead of burning – a psychological propaganda tactic, to avoid hypocritical accusations of ‘Book-Burning!’ Unfortunately, those in charge of disposal often didn’t know Michael Angelo from Mickey Mouse, and thousands of innocuous, even extremely rare books were Pulped!

A list of 35,000 books were banned as well as all textbooks published from 1933 to 1945. All publications and materials were ordered by the Allied ‘Re-Education’ teams to be “Released to the Commanders of each Zone to be destroyed.”
They were removed from all libraries, schools, universities, research institutes, academies, technical or academic societies, book-stores, publishing houses and even from private homes… then destroyed.
This massive, haphazard vandalism was carried out by Communists, Jewish Partisans and other unqualified people from 1946 to 1952, where many books were lost forever due to careless storage and handling, as well as deliberate eradication, all under the battle cry of making the world a safer place.

This was the greatest campaign of book destruction of all time and ended up being applied not only to the apparent offending books, but to poetry, philosophy, musical verse, calendars, horse books, books about trade and agriculture, driving manuals, books about flowers, home building, barns, astronomy, plumbing, poets, tennis and books about gardening. Hundreds of years of the most ingenuitive, classical and virtuous German history and culture, were lost due to this arrogant abuse of authority, brazen incompetence and total ignorance.

Books about birds made the list, as well as books by Friedrich the Great, Bismarck and antique European military history books and chronicles. Popular children’s books, including rare editions of the Brothers Grimm, were pulped on the grounds that they “Provoked violence.” Everything about the Olympic Games of 1936, the most innovative and greatest Games the world had known to that date, was banned! Books by the ancient poets were pulped. Even books once banned (not burned) by the National Socialists were destroyed too!? Sloppy handling caused the loss of the entire musical works of Richard Strauss and many Gutenberg bibles were fried in this orgy of stupidity.

Of Morgenthau’s Plan for ‘Re-Education’ titled, “Education and Propaganda” stated;

(a) All schools and universities will be closed until an Allied Commission of Education has formulated an effective reorganization program. It is contemplated that it may require a considerable period of time before any institutions of higher education are reopened. 
Meanwhile the education of German students in foreign universities will not be prohibited. 
Elementary schools will be reopened as quickly as appropriate teachers and textbooks are available. 
(b) All German radio stations and newspapers, magazines, weeklies, etc. shall be discontinued until adequate controls are established and an appropriate program formulated.”

Further testament to the intentions of the Victorious All-lies to annihilate German memory and not to free Germany, in jurisdiction, movement or mind, is the Secret Treaty (Geheimer Staatsvertrag), enacted two days prior to the enactment of the German [Occupational] Provisional Constitution on 23 May 1949, which gave complete All-lied control over electronic and print media, film, culture and education until the year 2099 – 150 years of thought control secretly given to the U.K., France and the U.S. for west Germany.
The Treaty also provided for the confiscation of Germany’s gold reserves to be held in the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which the Rothschilds have a 57% shareholding. (See: here)

Beginning with ‘Re-Education’ at the end of the War, Occupational Germany has continued the strict censorship imposed by the Soviet and the Allied occupiers. Even today, using the ‘Special history’ excuse, the Internationalist occupiers forbid ‘Nationalistic’ books, songs and symbols, making them completely illegal, even in private, in Austria and Germany; and, the Occupational Authorities in Germany have been aggressive in trying to expand its own strict laws beyond its borders.
Almost all prosecutions of censorship violations have taken place in connection with what they term Holocaust ‘Revisionism’ or ‘Denial.’ Merely questioning an aspect, re-analysing data, expressing a maverick theory or trying to revise a statistic pertaining to this subject, is lumped under ‘Holocaust Denial’ and ‘Hate Speech’ which is illegal not only in Germany and Austria, but in most of Europe.
“To have failed to write about a particular historical event in a balanced manner” (hypocrisy?) is a crime that can send an amateur historian to jail and he will often serve a longer sentence than a paedophile or serial rapist.

Thousands of people have been convicted of violating European ‘Denial’ laws – thought control policies – and they are currently languishing in European dungeons. Cases prosecuted under these laws go unchallenged even when the convicted parties were pacifists and never proposed violence, but were simply expressing their opinion. In the cases of scientists, artists, singers or writers convicted of this offence, their homes and businesses are raided and their work is destroyed by the state. Worse, the definition of ‘Denial’ is being broadened and is defined today as ‘Hard-Core’ and ‘Soft-Core’ Denial, the latter including discussion of the Allied War-Crimes of the Terror-Bombing Campaign against historic and civilian Germany, as well as the Expulsions of ethnic German women, children and the elderly after the war. Even liberal writers extremely critical of the Third Reich have been tarnished as ‘Soft-Core Deniers’ when they came out with books discussing the heavy toll of Allied Terror-Bombing upon the German civilian population during the war, slaughtering millions of innocents, in defiance of all international law, to which no-one has ever stood accountable.

But be sure to remember how those Evil Germans banned societal rotting books, which is purportedly an ideology the Allied ‘Liberators’ have saved humanity from ever having inflicted upon them again.
“Never Again”?

1948 comicsIn 1948, children – overseen by priests, teachers, and parents – publicly burned several hundred comic books in both Spencer, West Virginia, and Binghamton, New York. Once these stories were picked up by the national press wire services, similar events followed in many other cities. Beginning in 1948, Fredric Wertham wrote and spoke widely, arguing about the detrimental effects that comics reading had on young people. Consequently, his book ‘Seduction of the Innocent’ serves as a culminating expression of his sentiments about comic books.

No-one ever accused these parents, teachers and priests of being evil for protecting their children’s’ minds from rot.


Further reading from Revisionist – Here

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic


Bergen-Belsen: The Scape-Goating of Josef Kramer

Featured Image: Entry at Bergen-Belsen Warning of Typhus, 1945.

14,000 Internees Die After British Occupation

April 15, 1945, after mutual negotiations with German Officers, British troops apparently “liberated” (by occupation) the Bergen-Belsen transit and sick camp.
The British troops who took over administration of the Belsen camp, three weeks before the official end of the war, were shocked by the many unburied corpses and dying inmates they encountered. Horrific photos and films of the camp’s emaciated corpses and mortally sick inmates, were quickly circulated around the western nations.
Within weeks, the British military occupation newspaper proclaimed to the world:

“The story of that greatest of all exhibitions of ‘man’s inhumanity to man’ which was Belsen Concentration Camp is known throughout the world.”

The narrative that accompanied the horrid imagery, was, as it is today, a gross distortion of the camp’s true history.

Nordhausen bombed - CopyThe world was aghast with the propaganda narration of the Glorious Allies, which accompanied the imagery expounded around the world. The first repeated imagery drilled into the eyes of naive westerners in their quiet, war-free lands, were initially from only two camps; Bergen-Belsen and Nordhausen – the latter a hospital camp, purely for the sick and, predominantly, did not accommodate Jews.
Unlike Bergen-Belsen, one hundred percent of the deaths at Nordhausen, in the imagery (left), in fact, died as a Direct Result of Allied aerial warfare; bombing the hospital camp and adjacent town full of innocent civilians, into rubble – 3/4 of the town was flattened, killing 8,800 people and 3 – 4,000 sick inmates in the hospital camp – April 3rd & 4th, 1945. Whereas, the Bergen-Belsen deaths were an Indirect Result of the same allied aerial warfare. However, the deaths at both camps (and all others), have been blamed on Evil Germans and their alleged systematic Extermination Policy, via allied war propaganda – the victors version of events!
Any atrocity propaganda disseminated by the allies thereafter, was accepted without question, as the stage of horror and German guilt had already been set in the minds of the unsuspecting public, by the misrepresentation of Belsen and Nordhausen. This also misdirected any attention away from questioning the war crimes, crimes against humanity and sadistic conduct of the allies, or, it colloquially justified it when discovered.
This version of events, was a successful attempt at ensuring that public opinion (published opinion) would naively accept that the sacrifice of their own sons and daughters, was worthy for a noble cause in the pursuit of world peace for humanity… a peace the war-mongering victors are still yet to find ever since, as they seek out and bomb one alleged Evil Enemy after another, in a whirl-wind of consecutive geopolitical aims.

1298169The first camp in question, concerning the ghastly images that were captured by Allied photographers at Bergen-Belsen in mid-April 1945 – widely reproduced ever since – have greatly contributed to the camp’s reputation as a notorious systematic extermination center. However, in actuality, the dead of Bergen-Belsen were, above all, unfortunate victims of war and its turmoil. It can be verifiably argued that the effects created by the Allied destruction of the entire European theatre – through the terrorism of their Obliteration Bombing policy, created the very conditions that led to their deaths… war conditions, not  Extermination Policy – as the British enacted and, with the joint-coordination of the U.S., systematically implemented in their genocidal campaign upon Germany.

Belsen served as a Transitional Camp, where more than 9,000 Jews with citizenship papers or passports for Latin American countries, entry visas for Palestine, or other documents making them eligible for emigration, arrived at Bergen-Belsen in late 1943 and 1944, from Poland, France, Holland and other parts of Europe. During the final months of the war, several groups of these emigre’s were transported from Axis-occupied Europe. German authorities transferred several hundred to neutral Switzerland and, at least one group of 222 Jewish internees was transferred from Belsen to British-Mandate Palestine.

Up until late 1944, conditions were generally better than in other camps. Marika Abrams, a Jewish woman from Hungary, was transferred from Auschwitz in 1944 and her testimony confirms the hygienic and routine conditions at Belsen, even that late in the war. Years later she recalled just her arrival at Belsen;

“…We were each given two blankets and a dish. There was fresh running water and latrines….The conditions were so superior to Auschwitz, we felt we were practically in a sanitarium.”

Inmates received three meals a day. Coffee and bread were served in the morning and evening, with cheese and sausage when available. The main mid-day meal consisted of one litre of vegetable stew and bread. Families also lived together, otherwise, in keeping with the morality of the day, men and women were housed in separate barracks and for their safety from other potentially dangerous inmates. This was not just ethical, but due to the NSDAP’s strict adherence to the Third Geneva Convention, which Germany was not only signatory to since 1929, but it was Ratified by Hitler in February 1934.

Part I: Article III
“Prisoners of war are entitled to respect for their persons and honour. Women shall be treated with all consideration due to their sex.”

During the final months of the war, tens of thousands of refugees were evacuated west to Belsen from Auschwitz and other eastern camps, that were either deteriorating due to war conditions or were increasingly threatened by the advancing Jewish-Bolsheviks. German officials of the camps gave the internees the choice to stay or leave with them as they evacuated… a great majority voluntarily left with German officials, to avoid the encroaching Red Army, while those too sick to travel remained (pursuant to Part III: Article IX).
Belsen became severely overcrowded as the number of inmates increased from 15,000 in December 1944, to 42,000 at the beginning of March 1945, while it rapidly increased to more than 50,000, less than one month later… many bringing with them disease infested lice, due to the conditions of the war-torn east.

So catastrophic had conditions become during the final months of the war, that about a third of the prisoners evacuated to Belsen in February and March 1945, perished during the journey and were dead on arrival, as well as German officials… many also being shot up by Allied fighter planes, which strafed anything and anyone that moved, even trainloads full of people and camp supplies.

As order broke down across Europe during those chaotic final months of the war, regular deliveries of food and medicine to the camp stopped. Foraging trucks were sent out to scrounge up whatever supplies of bread, potatoes and turnips that were available in nearby towns, trying to evade Allied strafing during the task… often not returning.

Epidemic Typhus

Disease was kept under control by routinely disinfecting all new arrivals – pursuant to Part II: Article XIII of the Third Geneva Convention, in order to “Prevent Epidemics”. But in early February 1945, a large transport of infected Hungarian transports was admitted while the disinfection facility was out of order. As a result, typhus broke out and quickly spread beyond control.

Commandant Josef Kramer quarantined the camp in an effort to save lives, but SS Camp Administration headquarters in Berlin – unaware of how extreme conditions had become – insisted that Belsen be kept open to receive still more evacuees arriving from the East.


The worst killer was typhus, but typhoid fever and dysentery also claimed many lives. Aggravating the situation was a policy during the final months of transferring already sick inmates from other camps to Belsen, which was then officially designated a Sick or Convalescence Camp (Krankenlager). The sick women of Auschwitz, for example, were transferred to Belsen in three groups in November-December 1944.

[Disease being the cause of death, is confirmed by Dr. Charles Larson, leading Forensic Pathologist, Colonel of the U.S. Medical Corps, assigned to the Judge Advocate Generals Department and the only Forensic Pathologist in the entire European war theatre – see here]

Hair cutsWhen SS chief, Heinrich Himmler, learned of the typhus outbreak at Bergen-Belsen, he immediately issued an order to all appropriate officials requiring that;
“All medical means necessary to combat the epidemic should be employed… There can be no question of skimping either with doctors or medical supplies.”

[Above image: Removal of infested clothing, lice-infested hair removal and baths away from other internees, to help combat the Typhus Epidemic – Officers right]

However, the general breakdown of order that prevailed on Germany by this time, made it completely impossible to implement the command.

Kramer Reports a ‘Catastrophe’

make-shift tentsIn a March 1, 1945, letter to Gruppenfuhrer (General) Richard Glucks, head of the SS camp administration agency, Commandant Kramer reported in detail on the catastrophic situation that was amplifying in Bergen-Belsen, and pleaded for help:
[Right: Make-shift tents erected in desperate measures]

Supply: When I took over the camp, winter supplies for 1500 internees had been indented for; some had been received, but the greater part had not been delivered. This failure was due not only to difficulties of transport, but also to the fact that practically nothing is available in this area and all must be brought from outside the area …“If I had sufficient sleeping accommodation at my disposal, then the accommodation of the internees who have already arrived and of those still to come would appear more possible. In addition to this question a spotted fever and typhus epidemic has now begun, which increases in extent every day. The daily mortality rate, which was still in the region of 60-70 at the beginning of February, has in the meantime attained a daily average of 250-300 and will increase still further in view of the conditions which at present prevail.

For the last four days there has been no delivery [of food] from Hannover owing to interrupted communications, and I shall be compelled, if this state of affairs prevails till the end of the week, to fetch bread also by means of truck from Hannover. The trucks allotted to the local unit are in no way adequate for this work, and I am compelled to ask for at least three to four trucks and five to six trailers. When I once have here a means of towing, then I can send out the trailers into the surrounding area… The supply question must, without fail, be cleared up in the next few days. I ask you, Gruppenführer, for an allocation of transport…

State of Health: The incidence of disease is very high here in proportion to the number of internees. When you interviewed me on Dec. 1, 1944, at Oranienburg, you told me that Bergen-Belsen was to serve as a sick camp for all concentration camps in north Germany. The number of sick has greatly increased, particularly on account of the transports of internees that have arrived from the East in recent times – these transports have sometimes spent eight or fourteen days in open trucks…

The fight against spotted fever is made extremely difficult by the lack of means of disinfection. Due to constant use, the hot-air delousing machine is now in bad working order and sometimes fails for several days…

A catastrophe is taking place for which no one wishes to assume responsibility… Gruppenführer, I can assure you that from this end everything will be done to overcome the present crisis…

I am now asking you for your assistance as it lies in your power. In addition to the above-mentioned points I need here, before everything, accommodation facilities, beds, blankets, eating utensils – all for about 20,000 internees … I implore your help in overcoming this situation.”

These are not the words of a man purportedly keeping to so-called “Extermination Policy” rather, humane ethics and International Law. Kramer did everything in his power to reduce suffering and prevent death among the inmates, even appealing to the hard-pressed German army;

“I don’t know what else to do,” he told high-ranking army officers.
“I have reached the limit. Masses of people are dying. The drinking water supply has broken down. A trainload of food was destroyed by low-flying [Allied] war planes. Something must be done immediately.”

Working together with both Commandant Kramer and chief inmate representative Kuestermeier, Colonel Hanns Schmidt responded by arranging for the local volunteer fire department to provide water. He also saw to it that food supplies were brought to the camp from abandoned rail cars. Schmidt later recalled in regards to Kramer;

“…He worked with great dedication to improve conditions in the camp. For example, he rounded up horse drawn vehicles to bring food to the camp from rail cars that had been shot up.”

Kramer later explained to incredulous British military interrogators: “I was swamped…”

“The camp was not really inefficient before you [British and American forces] crossed the Rhine. There was running water, regular meals of a kind – I had to accept what food I was given for the camp and distribute it the best way I could. But then they suddenly began to send me trainloads of new evacuees from all over Germany. It was impossible to cope with them. I appealed for more staff, more food. I was told that this was impossible. I had to carry on with what I had.

Then as a last straw, the Allies bombed the electric plant that pumped our water. Loads of food were unable to reach the camp because of the Allied fighters. Then things really got out of hand. During the last six weeks I have been helpless. I did not even have sufficient staff to bury the dead, let alone segregate the sick… I tried to get medicines and food for the inmates and I failed. I was swamped. I may have been hated, but I was doing my duty.”

Josef KramerKramer’s clear conscience is also suggested by the fact that he made no effort to save his life by fleeing, but instead calmly awaited and negotiated with British forces, naively confident of decent treatment.
Nor does this reconcile with the ‘Systematic German Killing Machine’ which we are told of, where Germans went to great lengths to conceal mass murder by burning bodies and documents of internees, as with Auschwitz – the purported proof being pivotal on, non-existent evidence?

When the Belsen Camp was eventually taken over by the Allies, he later stated, “I was quite satisfied that I had done all I possibly could, under the circumstances, to remedy the conditions in the camp.”

British Occupation

British 2nd Army at Belsen, April 1945

Right: Officers of the British 2nd Army and two Officers of the Wehrmacht, negotiate the agreement regarding the transfer of the neutral territory of the Belsen camp to the British Army, 12th April, 1945. Subsequently the 11th Armoured Division occupied the camp, 15 April, 1945. As British forces approached Bergen-Belsen, German authorities sought to turn over the camp to the British, so that it would not become a combat zone spreading disease and endangering the inmates further, or anybody else in the vicinity.

Two German officers presented themselves before the British outposts and explained that there were 9,000 sick in the camp and that all sanitation had failed. They proposed that the British should occupy the camp at once, as the responsibility was an international issue in the interests of health. In return for the delay caused by the truce, the Germans offered to surrender intact the bridges over the river Aller. After consideration, the British senior officer rejected the German proposals, saying it was necessary that the British should occupy an area of ten kilometers around the camp in order to be sure of keeping their troops and lines of communication away from the disease. After some time, it was peacefully transferred, with an agreement that “both British and German troops will make every effort to avoid battle in the area.”

Joined Typhus Photos

kramer-in-court-during-belson-trial-w339b-y2k-the-camp-kommandant-b3p580Shackled Monster of Belsen

Despite the obvious situation and conditions Bergen-Belsen was suffering, Commandant Kramer, who was vilified in the British and American press as “The Beast of Belsen” and “The Monster of Belsen,” was put on trial and then executed, along with chief physician, Dr. Fritz Klein, Irma Grese and other camp officials.
At his trial, Kramer’s defense attorney, Major T.C.M. Winwood, predicted:

“When the curtain finally rings down on this stage Josef Kramer will, in my submission, stand forth not as ‘The Beast of Belsen’ but as ‘The Scapegoat of Belsen’.”

In an “act of revenge,” the British [so-called] liberators, expelled the civilian German residents of the nearby town of Bergen, and then permitted camp inmates to loot the houses and buildings. Much of the town was also set on fire.

The obvious Typhus fear spreading Europe – as the Allies barbarous aerial campaign creating the diseased conditions – intensified, signs, posters and flyers were posted wherever possible, warning in concentrated areas.

according to wikipedia

According to Wikipedia: Epidemic Typhus is also known as ‘Camp Fever’ – ‘War Fever’ and ‘Famine Fever’ etc. Resulting from society and sanitary conditions from wars and other disasters.

quarantine teamHOWEVER, when the British took control of the camp, the new Allied administrators proved no more capable of mastering the chaos than the Germans had, despite all their assistance with quarantine teams, man power, hygiene and medical supplies, while not being hindered by war-planes, supplies and transports, as the German administration were.

The notorious Bergen-Belsen camp where – according to Court Historians – purportedly 50,000 – 100,000 inmates (although a maximum of 60,000 ever passed through) were supposedly murdered – it was actually, about 7,000 inmates who died during the period when the camp existed under German administration, from 1943 to 1945.

Quarantine team, 2

However, they died in the final months of the war as a result of disease and malnutrition – consequences of the allied carpet bombings and fighter planes shooting up everything that moved on road or rail, which had completely disrupted normal deliveries of medical supplies and food – not to mention creating the very conditions where the killer diseases thrived and exploded into epidemic proportions.
This was an expected catastrophe the Allies would have been quite well aware of, not only through their intercepts of German record transmissions (such as Josef Kramer’s to Gruppenfuhrer Richard Glucks, above) and all communications decoding of and by the Enigma machine, but also through their own historical experience of thousands dying from epidemic diseases in American concentration camps during their Civil War, thousands dying in the British concentration camps during the Boer War, the thousands of Philippino’s who died in American concentration camps during their Genocide of 3 million Philippino’s and, every war since then – WITHOUT EXCEPTION! – where war-time diseases had always claimed more lives than those lost in combat. In fact, the Typhus Epidemic from WWI had not been completely over-come by the onset of WWII and had actually been exasperated by the activities of the war.
In this instance, the Allies intentionally played on this expected suffering of war-time diseases, in the pursuit of a political narrative, amplifying it with more easily distributed, internationally coordinated, means of photographic sharing and publishing, than what was ever available before.

The ‘Human Laundry’ was created in a former barracks. There were 20 cleansing stations where internees were treated with delousing powder and their infected skin scrubbed clean. Units were brought in with protective sanitary clothing to deal with the sick and the dead, all German nurses and treating women were given white headdresses to prevent the spread of lice and, British Officers continued to treat those suspected to be not yet infected…

…despite this highly organised attempt at combating the war time disease, almost 14,000 internees died at Bergen-Belsen in the months following the British Occupation… twice as many than under German Administration!

Belsen sign

The Memorial Sign that stands at Bergen-Belsen, attests to the post-British-occupation deaths, but somehow, they are still attributed to alleged ‘German Atrocities’?


Unless of course, the “Evil Germans” had effectively trained the typhus-ridden lice to ignore British command and to continue killing in their absence?


Burning Belsen

A further measure in attempt to overcome the Typhus Epidemic, was to destroy a certain number of the urine, dysentery and Typhus ridden barracks, by setting them on fire. Claimed now by the latter-day ‘Exterminationists’ that it was a poignant ceremony to delete the memory of purported ‘German Atrocities’ – a therapeutic exercise?
However, this narrative does not reconcile with the desperation for accommodations for the internees, or the fact that the majority of the facilities were still utilised and left untouched after British occupation.


A fine example of hysteria propaganda mixed with truths at the time.  Acknowledgement of the obvious Epidemic, not uncommon knowledge since the Great War, blended with atrocity propaganda pulling numbers out of thin air. 7 million just at Treblinka alone? This exceeds the forever-changing numbers of Auschwitz. Could anyone even find 7 million corpses then alone count them, if they were allegedly burned to unrecognised ashes and bull-dozed?

Yossl RosensaftFrom 1945 until 1950, when it was finally shut down, the British maintained Belsen as a camp for ‘Displaced Persons’ (DP’s). It mostly continued as a sick and transitional camp for emigrants, no differently than it had under German administration, but now, they were mostly directed to Palestine.
During this period it achieved new notoriety as a major European black market center. Many Jewish-Partisans who made their way to Belsen, used it as a place for organising training for the Jewish-insurgency in Palestine, the illegal smuggling to Palestine (Aliyah-Bet) and, using much of the unlimited U.S. Occupation Marks (courtesy of U.S. tax payers) and $3.7 billion UNRRA funding, for Zionist purposes. The “Uncrowned King” of Belsen’s 10,000 Jews was Yossl (Josef) Rosensaft, who amassed tremendous profits from the illegal trading in arms, art and diamonds – looted from the Germans – and, from Jewish sponsors. Rosensaft had been interned in various camps, including Auschwitz (more miraculous survival stories no doubt) before arriving at Belsen in early April 1945… He now turned his attention to demonising the British, who not only “Liberated” the camp he conducted his criminal business from, but who were the Mandate Government of Palestine… the very land the Jews sought to usurp for a ‘Jewish State’ without British oversight and, agitated against a restricted Reservation’ as proferred by some NSDAP members.
With all his opining and rousing for a Jewish State in Palestine, Rosensaft decided to not live in Occupied Palestine himself, but lived and traveled between Switzerland, America and London, dying at the latter, leaving great debts for the ‘acquisition’ of the art and other unearned lavishness.

Just as the Germans had finished the same losing battle against Jewish-guerrilla warfare predominantly in the east, the English then had to turn their attention to British-Mandate Palestine and, fight terrorist war there, against Jews themselves… which they also lost and, so too, are the Palestinians.

A Life-Saving warning Sign from German Camps:
“One Louse = Your Death”

German camp sign

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

The BIRTH OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: Part 1 – Christian Ramallah, King David Hotel & Guerilla Warfare Spreads From Europe to the Orient

Oust the B’rith-ish, Enter the US of Israel,
Good-bye Roosevelt & Declare the ‘State’
Subscribe to receive notifications of future publishing  red-arrow


Source: Wikipedia

Ramallah, originally a village founded by Ghassanid Christians in the 1500’s, is today a Palestinian city in the central West Bank, 10 km north of Jerusalem. It serves as the defacto administrative capital of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). Ramallah was historically a Christian town, but today Muslims form the majority of the population, with Christians still making up a significant minority.

The city grew dramatically in the 17th and 18th centuries as an agricultural village, attracting more (predominately Christian) residents from around Palestine. In 1700, Yacoub Elias was the first Ramallah native to be ordained by the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem. In the early 19th century, the first Greek Melkite Orthodox Christian church was built and the Church of Transfiguration was built in the 1850’s. That same decade, the Latin Church established its presence, becoming the 2nd largest Christian denomination. The Catholic Church established the St. Joseph’s Girl’s School and the Al-Ahliyyah College, run by Rosary Sisters. Later, with the influx of Muslim and Christian refugees, new mosques and churches were built, with both Muslim and Christian Palestinians, peacefully cohabiting together.

In 1836, American biblical scholar Edward Robinson visited the area, noting that the inhabitants were Christian “of the Greek rite.” The village belonged to the Haram al-Sharif (the Temple Mount), Jerusalem, to which it paid an annual tax of 350 Mids of grain.
In 1883, the Palestine Exploration Fund’s Survey of Western Palestine described Ramallah as;

“A large Christian village, of well-built stone houses, standing on a high ridge, with a view on the west extending to the sea. It stands amongst gardens and olive-yards, and has three springs to the south and one on the west; on the north there are three more, within a mile from the village. On the east there is a well. There are rock-cut tombs to the north-east with well-cut entrances, but completely blocked with rubbish. In the village is a Greek church, and on the east a Latin convent and a Protestant schoolhouse, all modern buildings. The village lands are Wakuf, or ecclesiastical property, belonging to the Haram of Jerusalem. About a quarter of the inhabitants are Roman Catholics, the rest Orthodox Greeks.”


Ramallah was declared a modern city in 1908 and had an elected municipality as well as partnership projects with the adjacent town of al-Bireh.

Then things changed… DRAMATICALLY!

balfour-rothschildThe British Army occupied Ramallah in December 1917, one month after the Balfour Declaration, where Lord Arthur Balfour, on behalf of the Foreign Office of the British Government, declared to Lord Walter Rothschild, that their illegitimate, interloping third party authority, had promised Palestine to the Jews… and it remained under British rule until 1948.

The 1936–39 revolt was a nationalist uprising by Palestinians in Mandatory Palestine, against the then 19 year British occupation and exponential Jewish immigration since WWI. It initially began as a general strike, demanding the end to Jewish immigration and the establishment of Palestinian Independence, pursuant to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations: The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration” and that the Mandate would only apply until the communities could stand alone, which was incorporated into the Mandate.

british-bomb-ramallah-1938As a center of activities against the occupation and Jewish immigration, the British R.A.F ultimately attacked Ramallah in a controlled aerial bombing campaign, in 1938 – many were killed and injured – while over 3 years of the revolt and all of Palestine in general, tens of thousands of Palestinians lost their lives.

In this short compilation of speeches [2:42], Hitler highlights the hypocrisy of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s demands regarding which nations he claims should be left to their own independence; including nations such as Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Finland and Latvia, already invaded and occupied by US’ allies, the Jewish Bolsheviks – who incidentally had already usurped and Revolutionised Russia (both facilitated by Jewish finance), along with Palestine, occupied by the British and Jewish revolutionaries.

The 1936-1939 Revolt spurred the British to host the Arab-Zionist London Conference, seeking to find agreement in governance and to end the British Mandate in Palestine – however, it ended in failure.
In response to this failure, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was only elected in 1937, introduced the 1939 White Paper, which was approved by the House of Commons (Lower House) May 23, 1939it served as a principle governing policy until 1947.
The Paper was plain in stating that; the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country.

Chamberlain’s Paper called for the then 450,000 Jewish immigrants already in Palestine – the majority who had only settled since WWI – to be restricted to only 75,000 further immigrants over the next 5 years – to maintain demographic percentages – after which, Jewish immigration to Palestine would be for Arab Authorities to decide (Section II).
It also called for the establishment of an Independent Palestinian State within 10 years, while rejecting the idea of creating a Jewish State and, also rejecting the idea of partitioning Palestine – as recommended by the Peel Commission.
Restrictions were put on the rights of Jews to buy land from Arabs (Section III), as a safeguard for Arab cultivators to maintain their existing standard of life and, so a considerable landless Arab population was not created. Further, it promised that ONLY with Palestinian support would Britain allow a Jewish State.


Jewish demonstrations against the White Paper in Jerusalem

This so greatly upset the Jews, that in response, the propaganda of Persecution of Jews in Germany escalated, as purported cause for Palestinians to accommodate Jewish demands to their own land… all while Jewish Leaders in Western lands hindered Jewish immigration to other nations. If they weren’t prepared to go to Palestine, they weren’t fit for anywhere… Palestine only!

balfour-declarationDuring the debates on the Paper in May 1939 (before the ‘Official’ outbreak of WWII in September, 1939), the Jewish Liberal MP, James Rothschild, stated that; for the majority of the Jews who go to Palestine it is a question of migration or of physical extinction.”

Winston Churchill vehemently opposed the Paper and, for what is said to be one of his greatest parliamentary speeches of his career, he sought a lunch meeting that very same day with his long time WWI friend, 2nd time President of the World Zionist Organisation, Dr. Chaim Weizmann (later 1st President of Israel) and Churchill’s Scientific Advisor, Frederick Lindemann (Architect of the Dehousing Paper – the “Extermination Policy” to slaughter 25 million German civilians), for their approval of his speech, before oration.

Churchill’s speech pressed upon the White Paper being contradictory to the character and so-called “British” promise of the Balfour Declaration – which was actually authored by the Jewish, First Lord of the Admiralty, Leopold Amery (aka, Mauritz Amery). He ignored the fact that [allegedly] British politicians, being all so balanced in their international diplomatic dealings – or rather playing both sides – had also made a similar promise to the Arabs, via the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, in exchange to help defeat the Ottoman Empire during WWI – essentially to balkanise the region – even sending Thomas E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) to establish the Arab Legion and incite the 1916 Revolt. The intentional reneging of the Arab promise, was exposed by the Secret Sykes-Picot Agreement.
Churchill also ignored that the idolised Balfour Declaration did not propose to make Palestinians a threatened minority in their own nation, only promised the Jews a ‘Homeland’ – not a Sovereign Jewish State – as well as ignoring the fact that the Balfour Letter was neither a Treaty or a Bill that passed through the House’ of Commons or Lords… it was simply just a ‘Declaration’ agreed to by Cabinet Members amongst themselves – which was initially absent of the full force of U.K. Law, especially in international matters… until the language of the Declaration was incorporated into the Mandate.

The Arab Higher Committee argued that the independence of a future Palestinian Government would prove to be illusory, as the Jews would prevent its functioning by withholding participation and compliance. This predictive assessment has since proven to be true, in regard to all enactments and authoritative Resolutions or Legislation, which have stood in opposition to policies, territorial aims and actions of Jews and, the later State of Israel.


London, 1933, at the brink of International Jewry’s world-wide Economic Warfare against Germany and their Persecution Propaganda, which was denounced by German-Jews

hitler-and-chamberlain-shadowChamberlain, the only All-lied leader to ever consider or negotiate any of Hitler’s Peace Proposals (at least on the issue of ethnic Germans annexed to the post-WWI borders of the new Czechoslovakia, by the Versialles Dictat), was, after months of Appeasement Defamation from his own colleagues, railroaded in Parliament on May 7, 1940.
After 2 days of Parliamentary Debates, in what can be better described as an internal diplomatic political coup, Neville Chamberlain stepped down as Prime Minister. The war-mongering Winston Churchill, who was not duly elected by the British people, was immediately appointed as the British [war-time] Prime Minister – which was announced the following day.
That following day, May 10, 1940, coincidentally, just happened to be the day the Phony War ended and British Blenheim Bombers of the No. 15 Squadron bombed the Rotterdam airport in Holland. Later that day, bombers from the British 110 Squadron bombed German vessels near the Hague and continued against Germany’s legally contracted oil interests… the day when WWII actually began.
The Persecution Propaganda also went into overdrive, as another excuse for persistent war and an alternate Jewish Homeland in Palestine.



Illegal immigrants and “Survivors” wielding German Karabiner 98k rifles, now trained members of The Irgun

During and after WWII, in defiance of the restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine set out by the White Paper, underground Jewish Terrorist organisations such as – but not limited to – the Irgun, Haganah, Betar, Jewish Brigade, the Palmach and the most formidable Lehi (better-known as The Stern Gang; alligned to Stalin’s Bolshevism), Mossad LeAliya-Bet and Bricha, continued to smuggle Jewish immigrant Guerilla’s into Palestine and, in defiance of a later Arms Embargo imposed by the British, U.S. and the U.N., found other avenues to smuggle Polish, French, stolen Czechoslovakian shipments of arms (originally German army issue, mostly “captured” by the Jewish Bolsheviks) meant for Syria and the Arab Liberation Army (some 200 German MG-34 machine guns, 4,500 German P-18 rifles and 50,400,000 rounds of ammunition – a vast shipment the Yishuv were somehow privy to), stolen British arms, stolen U.S. arms and ultimately, gifted German arms.


Terrorist organisations, now turned IDF, women recruits train with German Karabiner 98k rifles, 1954.

With Jewish volunteers, Partisans, [alleged] ‘Holocaust Survivors’, [U.S. funded] European DP’s and the Jewish Revolutionaries who swarmed central Europe, now flooding Palestine, the underground terrorist organisations facilitated paramilitary tactical training for the illegal immigrant Guerilla’s – that is, those who had by-passed their [US and UNRRA funded] paramilitary training at the DP Camps, in Europe. This was overseen by the Jewish Agency (originally the Palestine Office of the WZO), which also coordinated some of the Aliyah Bet (Hebrew code-name given to illegal immigrants, by Jews) for more than 150,000 illegal immigrants (later 3 million), organising a total of 141 smuggling operations, on 116 different ships.


SS Patria sinking in the Haifa Port

Many ships were intercepted and illegals were taken to British Concentration Camps in Cyprus, where many escapes were organised to smuggle Jewish Guerilla’s out via tunnel systems, who were then put on small boats in the middle of the night, to Palestine.
One of the ship intercepts transferred 1,800 illegal Jewish immigrants to the SS Patria for deportation to the Mauritius Camp. The Haganah terrorists bombed and sank the exiting ship in the Haifa Harbour, killing 267 people (217 Jews – 50 British) and injuring 172 – many others unaccounted for were claimed to have swam to shore, self-migrated and were harboured by other illegals already in Palestine, with the help of the Irgun. The remaining illegal Jewish immigrants were sent to the British Atlit Concentration Camp in Palestine, but out of ‘Official Sympathy’, were permitted to enter Palestine a few months later, instead of deportation to Cyprus. Thus, the terrorist bombing was a success in the push for more illegal immigrant Jews in Palestine and bringing continued international political attention to the region.

“We have always been ready to sacrifice a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership. This was the plan of the Jews who instigated WW II. Some Jews were sacrificed so that the persecution propaganda could continue. It is a small price and there is nothing wrong with that.”
∼ Harold Rosenthal, 1976 – The Rosenthal Document – The Hidden Tyranny.


Entrance to the Atlit Camp

Upon entry to the Atlit camp – which was surrounded by barbed wire and watch-towers; the men were sent to one side, women to the other, they were sprayed with DDT (for treatment against Typhus ridden lice brought from war-torn Europe), then ordered to undress and enter the showers – as was international protocol, pursuant to the 1929 Geneva ConventionsArticle 13, for prisoners in camps.

            * History Should Not Be Judged By Double Standards! *  

 These Terrorist Organisations eventually amalgamated into the IDF (Israeli Defense Force), absorbing predominantly Haganah, Palmach, Lehi and Irgun terrorists – who continue the same operations today – however, now with an officially recognised international status and advanced weaponry.


Illegal immigrant Guerilla’s, “Holocaust Survivors” and DP’s in training as new members of the Haganah Terrorist Organisation, at one of the Jewish Agency’s transitional “Absorption Centers” in Palestine

After the war, with Jewish Terrorist elements disseminating throughout Palestine, hostilities increased toward both Christian and Muslim Arab natives and British Forces. Wide spread terrorist attacks and massacres became more prevalent, including (but certainly not limited to) the Baldat al-Shaikh Massacre, the Yehida Massacre, the British CID Headquarters bombing, the Deir Yassin Massacre, the British Officers Club Bombing & Raid, the Haifa Oil Refinery Massacre, the Christian Semiramis Hotel Bombing, the Al Khisas Massacre, the Acre Prison Break, the Dahmash Mosque Massacre, the Naser al-Din Massacre, the RAF Qastina Air Force Base attack and many, many more.
In the same manner as Jewish Guerilla’s via Stalin’s Order #0428, the Jewish Brigade and the German-speaking Jews of the S.I.G. (Special Interrogation Group) carried out atrocity and other operations in British and German uniforms, most of these attacks were carried out by Jewish terrorists who were, self-admittedly, disguised in either Arab attire, or British uniforms.

Self-defined ‘Terrorist Group’ the Lehi, along with Haganah, Irgun and others, had avowed its main aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by resort to force, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish State – a “new totalitarian Hebrew republic.”

The most infamous Terrorist Attack recognised by western nations, is the 1946 Bombing of the King David Hotel… the British administrative headquarters for Palestine.


British Mandate Administrative Headquarters, The King David Hotel – Before and After the Irgun Bombing

King David Hotel Bombing

The King David Hotel Bombing was a terrorist attack officially carried out by the Irgun, July 22, 1946, on the British Administrative Headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, accommodating the central offices for the British Mandatory authorities; principally the Secretariat of the Government, the Headquarters of the British Armed Forces for Palestine and Transjordan and, a branch of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the British Police.


Wanted Terrorist, Haganah Chief of General Headquarters, Moshe Sneh, (also head of the Jewish Agency’s illegal immigration and later elected Member to the first Knesset in 1949), sent to Wanted Terrorist, former head of the Polish Betar and Commander of the Irgun, Menachem Begin ( later 6th Prime Minister of Israel), instructions to “carry out the operation on the chick (code for the King David Hotel). There were repeated delays due to changing political situations, but the plan was eventually finalised between Irgun Chief of Operations, Amichai Paglin (later, Counter-Terrorism Advisor for Prime Minister Begin) and Commander of the Palmach, Itzhak Sadeh (former Commander of the Haganah, Founder of the elite commando arm – the FOSH and, Founder of the IDF)…
91 people of various nationalities and religions were killed and 46 injured.


Disguised as Arab workmen and as hotel waiters, members of the Irgun planted 770 lb of explosives in the basement of the main building of the hotel. The resulting explosion caused the disintegration of the entire western half of the southern wing of the hotel. Some of the inflicted deaths and injuries occurred on the road outside the hotel and in adjacent buildings.


In the following short film [3:27], Menachem Begin (Prime Minister at the time), still admitted to the “Claim of Responsibility” for the Terrorist Attack, however, he declares innocence because; quote, “We did not imagine that even one life would be lost” due to alleged telephone warnings of the impending attack – a claim repudiated by Chief Secretary of the Mandate Government, John Shaw.
In an echo of today’s Israeli government, who blame their slaughter of Palestinian children on the Palestinians themselves – for purportedly putting the children in the firing-line of Israeli missiles and not heeding warnings in alleged leaflet drops – Begin blames the deaths on the British for ignoring the [alleged] telephone warnings. These ridiculous misdirecting claims, contradict the fact that after planting the main bomb in the Hotel basement, the Irgun terrorists quickly slipped out and detonated a small explosive in the street outside the hotels southern wing; which Begin asserts, was to keep passers-by away from the area.
The British Police report written in the aftermath of the bombing made it quite plain; that the timing of the bombing (12:37pm) coincided with more lunch-time diners filling the bars and restaurants of the hotel and, that the first smaller explosion also resulted in a higher death toll, because it caused spectators from the hotel to gather in its south-west corner, directly over the bomb planted in its basement. The first explosion also caused the presence in the hotel of many emergency personnel and injured Arabs, who were brought into the Secretariat after their bus full of passengers, which had been passing, was blasted onto its side.
This double delayed bombing tactic, is claimed by Israeli Officials today, as a Signature tactic of Al-Qaeda (which does not exist in reality) and other allegedly Islamic terrorist organisations, to move people in tactical positions for the second bomb, to claim more lives.

The following short documentary [8:56] – although holding a narration slanted by the mainstream view of the Israeli government and, restricted in content – exposes the pride, mind-set, drive and agenda of these Terrorists as they reflect on their extremism of the time. Men who, incidentally, enjoy a free citizenship – or rather impunity – in the jurisdiction of the illegal, Jewish occupational State of Israel… protected from extradition or any accountability for their Crimes Against Humanity.


“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish State in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organisation for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university of budding crooks.”
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

This “Birth of International Terrorism” as a world media event – the origins by the creators of “Claiming Responsibility” – choreographed to attract international attention; is recounted by Begin’s personal Secretary and Chief of Staff, Yechiel Kadishai (member of Terrorist Organisations; Betar and Irgun – arms and immigrant smuggler), as a proud era of their terrorism in using “brutal force in order to to get rid of them” as these atheist-Jews wanted a Jewish State immediately and could not wait for a Jewish Messiah… not believing in g-d, but believing he gave them Palestine?
Irgun Commander, Shrage Elis (also locally commended for his part in the assault on British Intelligence offices), says that it was important, if they succeeded, that the “whole world sees” that they can fight the British.
King David Hotel bomber, Izahk Zadok (alias), quite happily and proudly recounts – on location – his role in placing the bombs. Smiling, he says, “I was dressed like an Arab… like you know, Arafat.”

Although claiming that the King David Hotel bombing was purely in response to Operation Agatha (the British operation which saw the arrest of thousands of Jews, seized arms caches and occupied the Jewish Agency building, from which many evidential documents of the Agency’s involvement with Haganah, Irgun, Palmach and Lehi operations were obtained, ultimately filed – and bombed – at the King David CID offices), Menachim Begin had actually devised a strategy of leverage he believed would force the British out. He proposed a series of guerrilla and terrorist attacks that would humiliate the British and damage their prestige, forcing the British to resort to repressive measures, which in turn would alienate the Yishuv (pre-state Jewish residents)… a similar strategy as used in Germany.
Begin relied on the international Jewish media eagerly reporting the action, which he referred to as; “turning Palestine into a glass house” with the world looking in. This international attention focusing more and more on British repression, would, along with the Holocaust Survivor rhetoric, create international sympathy for the Jewish cause, resulting in political pressure on Britain (again, as in Germany). Ultimately, the British would be forced to choose between continued repression or withdrawal and Begin was certain that in the end, the British would leave.

begin-peace-prize-speech-shadowProtocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – 7:6  (pg 16)

“In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments o f the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us…”

Menachem Begin with several Irgun Terrorist Recruits, 1948.

The plan was put into action and began with bombing the British Immigration Departments in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa. Next, the Income Tax Offices in those three cities were bombed, followed by a series of attacks on police stations in which many policemen were killed and weapons stolen. Meanwhile, the Lehi joined in with a series of shooting attacks on policemen too, with their operations being funded by Jewish merchants and insurance scams in the diamond industry (Irene Zisblatt was undoubtedly involved ∼ HT note).


Warwick Daily News, December 28, 1946 – Source: National Library of Australia

terrorists-make-fake-money-jewsLord Moyne, the British Resident Minister in the Middle East, who restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine, met with Winston Churchill October 26, 1944. He was surprised at the Prime Ministers changed attitude toward opening the flood-gates to Jewish immigration to Palestine. Chaim Weizmann, future President of Israel, had an urgent meeting with Churchill November 4, 1944 and Lord Moyne was assassinated by Lehi terrorists 2 days later.

Former head of Betar Poland, escaped convict and Lehi leader, Yitzhak Shamir (later, 7th Prime Minister of Israel), ordered Lord Moyne’s assassination. Prior to his Prime Minister-ship, Shamir was a leading Mossad operative, who directed Operation Damocles; the assassinations of German scientists working on the Egyptian missile program.
Commander of a Lehi fighting unit, Yaakov Banai (Betar member and founding member of the Polish Irgun; armed by the Polish government from 1935), said one of the purposes for Lord Moyne’s assassination was, “the action had to capture a place in the world press and lead political thoughts.”

bernadotte-shadowAlso assassinated by the Lehi was United Nations Mediator for Palestine, Folke Bernadotte, who proposed such settlements as: Full protection of religious and minority rightsGuarantees for Holy Places, religious buildings and sites; and Return of residents, displaced by the conflict. He was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

postage-stampsAlthough the Lehi was proclaimed to be absorbed into the IDF upon the Declaration of the State of Israel in May 1948, therefore disbanded, the Stern Gang terrorists assassinated Mr Bernadotte in September that same year. Titled as IDF soldiers, or Lehi terrorists, is apparently different according to Israeli international political linguistics… regardless, with either title, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir (their former Lehi Commander) exhumed back to Israel the bodies of the assassins; Eliyahu Bet-Zuri (who also planned to assassinate Winston Churchill) and Eliyahu Hakim. Both were laid in the Jerusalem Hall of Heroism in a state funeral with full military honours, attended by Israeli dignitaries at annual commemorations. They were later exalted – along with other terrorists – by monuments, plaques and national stamps bearing their images.




Auschwitz internal Courthouse

The Third Geneva Convention clarifies that the status of a detainee may be determined by a “competent tribunal.” Until such time, he or she must be treated as a Prisoner of War. After a tribunal has determined that a detainee is an Unlawful Combatant, the “detaining power” may choose to give the Unlawful Combatant the rights and privileges of a prisoner of war as described in the Third Geneva Convention, but the detaining power is under no obligation to do so.

german-soldier-dismembered-and-disembowelled-by-guerilla-partisans-in-greeceAn Unlawful Combatant who directly engages in armed conflict, in violation of the Laws of War, may be detained and prosecuted under the domestic law of the detaining power for such criminal action.

Pictured Right: German Soldier dismembered and disemboweled by Guerilla Partisans, in Greece.



Palmach Strike-Force

The summer of 1945, at the end of WWII, the British were not changing their policy on immigration, or on creating a Jewish State. The Persecution Propaganda also failed to have evoked the world to insist on opening the gates of Palestine to solve the historical Jewish Question (Problem) and, considering the source of that alleged persecution had been defeated, it was no longer an excuse for the need for Jews to leave Europe. So the Holocaust rhetoric and the push for Official Sympathy went into overdrive. Public opinion, steered by Jewish publications, shifted decisively against alleged British repression, especially in the west.


‘British Board of Deputies Condemns Repression in Palestine’ – Source: National Library of Australia


Repressed “Survivors”

The authorities of the Jewish Agency, Weizmann, Sharett and Ben-Gurion, then sent feelers out to the Irgun and Lehi to discuss an alliance. The end result was the Jewish Resistance Movement, established in October 1945, a framework under which the combined Haganah, Irgun, Palmach and Lehi, launched a further series of more intense coordinated anti-British operations… accompanied by more and more migrant fighters, resulting in a bigger Terrorist force, attracting more political attention.

 vast-arms-caches-discovered-jewish-preparations-copyThe Advertiser, Adelaide, July 4, 1946. Front Page.
Excerpt: “Practically every able-bodied Jew in Palestine belonged to the Haganah Organisation…”
National Library of Australia 


The British Army had, for months, wanted to take military action against the Zionist underground terrorist organisations, but had been surprisingly and frustratingly blocked by High Commissioner Alan Cunningham. Cunningham was also opposed to action being taken against the [arm of the World Zionist Organisation] the Jewish Agency, whose Chairman, David Ben-Gurion, was later the 1st Prime Minister of Israel (also Executive Head of the WZO in 1946 and later implicated in the
assassination of JFK over Israels nuclear plant at Dimona).
night-of-bridges-train-1946The decision to action changed when on June 16, 1946, saw the “Night of the Bridges,” when the Palmach blew up eight road and rail bridges, disabling transport routes linking Palestine to neighbouring countries and, on June 17, the Lehi attacked railway workshops in Haifa. Afterwards, the Irgun kidnapped six British officers.

Operation Agatha was the response in order to “end the state of anarchy” that was escalating in Palestine since the Jewish influx.
Up to 25,000 British Security Forces conducted operations all over Palestine and raided the Jewish Agency building: 2,675 Jews were arrested (UK Hansard Records), including, Moshe Sharett (later, 2nd Prime Minister of Israel).


Right: Future Prime Minister of Israel, Moche Sharett, along with other members of the Jewish Agency, arrested and detained at the Latrun camp in Palestine.


Article Left: Cairns Post, 30th December, page 1 – Source: National Library of Australia
Article Right: Kalgoolie Miner, 19th April, page 5.
Source: National Library of Australia

Just at Yagur alone, more than 300 rifles, some 100 2-inch mortars, more than 400,000 bullets, some 5,000 grenades and 78 revolvers were seized. All the men of Yagur were arrested, road-blocks maintained and curfews were imposed. According to Wikipedia, in protest, the women ripped their clothing off and showed their [alleged] Work-Camp Tattoos, bewailing, “this is what the Nazi’s did.” Reportedly, in response, several British troops shouted “Heil Hitler” as they continued to conduct the searches.


July 24, 1946, the Statement of Information Relating to Acts of Violence was published (2 days after the King David Hotel Bombing, but was prepared prior), which provided evidence on the Jewish insurgency in Palestine, including evidence that the Jewish Agency had in fact been involved with and coordinating with the terrorist groups. The pinnacle piece of evidence provided, was that authoritative telegrams sent from London to Palestine, by Chaim Weizmann (President of the World Zionist Organisation and 1st President of Israel) had been intercepted, identifying him as the operative under the code-name, Hayyim(UK Hansard records).

It is now officially claimed, that after the bombing of the King David Hotel, the Haganah, from then on, would rarely mount attacks against British forces and focused primarily on the Aliyah Bet-illegal immigrant smuggling. Although with the supposed amalgamation of the Terrorist Organisations under the ‘Jewish Resistance Movement’ and the wave of emigres; member activities, contacts and loyalties were difficult to determine.


Hanged and boobie-trapped bodies of British Sergeants Clifford Martin and Mervyn Paice

The Irgun and Lehi, quite proudly, continued waging full-scale insurgency attacks against the British, including (but not limited to), the Night of the Beatings, the Acre Prison break and the Sergeants affair and, together with the Haganah’s (and others) illegal immigration smuggling operations from Europe, it was exponentially increasing the influx of terrorist operatives within Palestine. After years of civil war due to the Balfour Declaration and almost 6 years of world war fighting on behalf of International Jewry (who Declared War on Germany in 1933 and 1938), now fighting against Jewry in Palestine, forced a large commitment of war-weary British forces to the country, which was gradually sapping British financial war credits, coincidentally, controlled by Jewish Financiers in London.


Palestine Police WANTED and REWARD Ad for Terrorists who orchestrated and escaped during the Acre Prison Break, disguised in British uniforms and Arab civilian attire. The murder of the two British Sergeants, was in reprisal for the apprehended escapees.

In September 1947, the British cabinet voted to leave Palestine and in November of that year, the United Nations imposed a Resolution to Partition the country between Arabs and Jews… which, as predicted by the Arab Higher Committee in 1938, would be ignored by Jews.


Pax Brittanica falls and passes the batten to Pax Americana, to take the role on behalf of International Jewry – an incremental phase toward Pax Judaica… discovered in Part Two.


March 12, 1948: The United Nations Special Committee on Palestine reported that;
“present indications point to the inescapable conclusion that when the [British] mandate is terminated, Palestine is likely to suffer severely from administrative chaos and widespread strife and bloodshed.”

(List of Massacres against Palestinians: 1947 – 1994)

(List of UN Resolutions on Israel regarding Palestine – more than all other Nations combined)
(UN Resolution 3379, Nov 10, 1975, recalls UN/Res 77 “the racist regime in occupied Palestine” and “condemned zionism as a threat to world peace and security” determining “zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”

courier-headline-3000-jews-attacking-arabs Courier Mail, April 26, 1948. Source: National Library of Australia

For the background as to why and how the International Jew manipulated both WWI and WWII, please listen to the speech given by Benjamin H. Freedman at the Willard Hotel, 1961, which gives an overview of the machinations behind both wars and, the establishment of the occupying State of Impunity – the Jewish State.

Mr Freedman, who was born into Judaism and later converted to Catholicism, was a journalist, an international diplomat, political peace activist, Founder of the international League for Peace with Justice in Palestine – 1946, an associate of assassinated United States President, John F. Kennedy, writer for the ‘Common Sense’ periodical and attendee at the conference for the WWI, Versailles Peace Treaty in France, 1919.

Part Two – COMING SOON – Subscribe to receive updates

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Further Resources:

“Nazi’s” Never Existed

There was never any such organisation as Nazi’s or a Nazi Party

The National Socialists (N.S.D.A.P. 1024px-speaker_icon-svg Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) never referred to themselves as Nazi’s.
It was, as it still is today, a political slogan used as a repressive weapon for the purposes of stifling dissent – hypocritically, the very social condition the National Socialists’ enemies have accused purported “evil Nazi’s” of having inflicted upon the German populace of the 1930’s.
The term “Nazi” is nothing more than an epithet and after 90 years, it is high time we learned where it came from, who invented it and why.

The term “Nazi” was actually created by the Communist-Marxist enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was/is a pejorative connotation; a belittling insult and a slur. The Germans, not Hitler, nor any other high ranking party officials ever referred to themselves as “Nazis”! They called themselves ‘National Socialists’ and nothing more.
Those who can read German and have studied any of the original documents and speeches, should know this already, but most do not. Yet the world and countless generations continue to echo this epithet as if it was as certain as the sun rising. This should give some insight into the mind manipulating power of media and propaganda. It should then, also give a clear indication of who is actually in control of the worlds media and propaganda – the Communist-Marxist enemies!

The term ‘Nazi’ (along with ‘Nazism’) is little more than a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden during the 1920’s, as a means of disparaging the NSDAP and the political and financial ideals of National Socialism in general. Heiden was a member of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and conveniently, also an influential Jewish journalist for both the Frankfurter Zeitung and the Vossische Zeitung German newspapers. Heiden’s SDP was renowned for its internal conflict created by its elements of Marxist members and progressively during the 1920’s and early 1930’s, ultimately lost the majority of its seats in the Reichstag to the National Socialists. By 1933, of the 647 seats in the Reichstag, the NSDAP held 288, the SDP held only 120 and the Communist Party, a mere 81 seats.

The slang term Nazi is a variation of the nickname Sozi (short for Sozialisten), which, at the time, was used in reference to members of Heidens’ SDP. “Nazi” was a political pun, based upon the Austro-Bavarian slang word for “simpleton” or “country bumpkin” and derived from the fairly common name, Ignatz (German form of Ignatius), colloquially meaning, a foolish, clumsy or awkward person. It would be the equivalent of calling someone “nutsy.”
So, if for no other reason than it being an insult, it should be easily understood why the term was regarded as derogatory by the National Socialists and why they would never use it to describe themselves as such.
One should also see why it would be made popular by the Communist-Marxist agitating propagandists and understood how it was seized upon by various other political opponents and subversive political movements – both within Germany and abroad – including the political leaders of the western powers, who clearly had been infiltrated by the same Communist-Marxist elements as well. [also see here]

It should immediately become apparent that, if there is no such thing as a “Nazi” – except in the propaganda which was invented and spewed by this man – then it follows logically, that there is also no such thing as a “Neo-Nazi” either. Those who would describe themselves as such are as ignorant as those who say they “hate Nazi’s” – they are equally deceived.
Further, again, if there was never any such thing as a “Nazi” (which includes the conspiratorial suggestion that there is purported magical etymology of ‘Na-Zi’) then there was never any political party merger between the National Socialists (Na-) and the Zionist Parties (-Zi), as gatekeeping and co-intelligence operations, even disseminated by the likes of Eustace Mullins, would suggest… there were never any ‘Zionist’ parties to begin with, let alone merger with them?
Those who believe and are led by such clever nonsense, are also equally deceived. This clever nonsense (along with much more) is used purely to misdirect people away from ever discovering the core truth of the Third Reich’s simple, however extraordinary achievements and more importantly, WHY and HOW they were achieved, which was in complete defiance of the well coordinated network of international politics and finance… the easy and simple truth of prosperity that can be obtained by all, which the international Communist propagandists fear the people of the world would ever discover, as it would see their monumental, parasitic power, disintegrate virtually overnight.

It is therefore, also highly likely, that those who promote ‘Neo-Nazism’ are also just agents whose job it is to keep the spectre of ‘evil Nazis’ alive in the minds of the divided and oppressed ethnic populations (as we also continually see with countless movies and allusions from all media), in order to continually effect the demonisation of all those who would dare question the whole history about Hitler, the National Socialists and WWII… which we have all, naively, been sold.

Further study at, Justice-4-Germans:…/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who…/
Demystifying the Transfer Agreement
and the Alleged National Socialist-Zionist Merger; and,
The National Socialist-Zionist Merger Myth

According to Wikipedia:
[Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) was an influential Jewish journalist and historian of the Weimar Republic and “Nazi” eras, most noted for the first influential biographies of German dictator Adolf Hitler. Often, he wrote under the pseudonym “Klaus Bredow]

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

1938 News Report: Financial War on “Anti-Semitic States” for “Persecuting Jewish FINANCIERS” not Civilian Jews

The Worker, the official organ of the Australian Labour Party in Queensland and regular periodical for various amalgamated Labour Unions throughout Australia (see here), reported to the world on January 4, 1938, that “International Jewry” was orchestrating a heavily funded financial war, in addition to their previous Declaration of War‘ – being the continuance of the 1933 world-wide Economic Boycott against Germany.

financiers_shadow-copyINTERNATIONAL JEWRY – Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States – £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised

‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.

‘The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.

‘The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000,000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.

‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.”

Source: National Library of Australia 

For over eight decades, the world has been led to believe that from the outset of 1933, the Germans “Persecuted” everyday German-Jews for simply being Jewish, even though German-Jews of the time, denounced this international propaganda. By International Jewry’s own admission, it was the self proclaimed “Jewish FINANCIERS” who – incidentally had their parasitic usurious positions outlawed by Germany’s Economic Reform –  were the ones being singled out and they did in fact feel the need to differentiate themselves from everyday Jews with this claim, as to who was supposedly being persecuted.
The targeting of “Jewish Financiers” was a well founded claim, as NSDAP policies and reform saw the cleansing of Communists in governmental positions and immoral financial and trading practices removed from the Reich – it just so happened that around 98% of these Communists and unscrupulous Speculators, were in fact Jewish. If these communist elements within Germany were Spanish or Chinese, their resulting fate would have been the same and it would have been due to their corrupt practices which greatly effected German society, not their ethnicity – as the other 2% of non-Jewish communists who also lost their positions, attests to.
However, whether being forbidden to continue economic rape against a nation and its people, could be considered “Persecution” is another question. Perhaps the reader may want to consider what life is like as the impoverished, starving and economically raped people, opposed to those minority tycoons who had their astronomical revenues through economic debt slavery reduced, in order to identify who was actually being persecuted?


judea-declares-war_shadowThis same ‘International Jewry’ Declared War on Germany in 1933, with the same ‘Jewish Persecution’ propaganda as the excuse… but what had actually occurred at this point in 1933? The German-Jews denounced the international Persecution Propaganda in defense of the honour of Germany, the Nuremberg Laws weren’t enacted until late 1935, even many German-Jews who lived under two flags at that later time, saw them as reasonable and did not suffer any deprivations with a new National status and, the Krystallnacht False-Flag – which resulted in the internment of many German-Jews – did not occur until November 1938 (10 months after the aforementioned half a billion Jewish financial war plan)… so what prompted ‘International Jewry’ to Declare War on Germany in 1933?

The duly elected Adolf Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933 and less than two months later, Judea Declared Economic Warfare on Germany, March 24, 1933 – coincidentally, only one day after Hitler received Plenary Power, via the passing of the Enabling Act – the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich (“Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich”). The Law to Remedy Distress, resulted in communist non-effect in the Reichstag, the abolition of over 30 useless, divide and conflicting parties that had destroyed Germany for the previous 14 years. The fact that it was International Jewry who responded to the abolition of communist power within Germany, by economic warfare, also attests to who the communists were/are.
(Hitler’s Reichstag speech, March 23, 1933)
International Jewry’s Declaration of Economic Warfare on Germany, was no idle threat upon a suffering people, who were reliant on their export in order for the people just to eat. The NSDAP came into possession of an impoverished nation and starving people, had virtually no army, the country was broke, enslaved by impossible WWI reparations and more than 30% of the people were suffering unemployment… all while a privileged few were living the high life at the expense of the starving and poverty stricken majority.
Germany had nothing in its hands to be a threat to anyone (except communist and financier positions) and with the monumental national problems within the country, the priorities of what deserved attention to revive the German Nation, did not revolve around putting yellow star stickers on less than one half of 1% of the population, as some inane attempt at national remedy.
However, what the NSDAP did possess, was a well prepared plan for economic reform and a 25 Point Program for the revival of the Nation, a program which was pivotal on the embodiment of the National Socialists Economic Reform. A program that would have been hindered if the communist votes were allowed to remain in the Reichstag.

The NSDAP’s Economic Reform for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money, was widely known in economist circles from 1919 and the 25 Point Program was publicly announced on February 24, 1920… It was this well considered and developed plan, which the NSDAP absolutely intended to implement, is what the self proclaimed “Jewish” Financiers anticipated and knew to be a threat to their corrupt, yet powerful positions. These international financial Tycoons and war profiteers, obviously felt a pre-emptive Counter-Offensive was in order!
A look at a few of the 25 Points will highlight who would benefit from them and who would detest these economic principles, claiming the abolition of their national theft as Persecution;

6. The right to vote on the State’s government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.

11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.

The Breaking of the Slavery of Interest

12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.

15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

Point 6: Opposed to being considered pro-German, shockingly enough in Germany itself, it has been ridiculed as discriminatory toward Jews; but in Western Nations, is it not Constitutional that Prime Ministers and Presidents be citizens of the nations they purport to lead, in attempt to guarantee national loyalties? Further, for example, would it be considered a moral political principle for U.S. citizens to flood Chinese Parliamentary positions, to dictate how the Chinese people will be administered in their own land, by American ideological legislative enactments? Would it be ethical to allow an ethnicity of less than 0.5% of any population, to decide how another ethnicity of +99% will be administered in their own land? Is that not contradictory to the Universal Right of Self-Determination, where Peoples have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and political policies, without interference?


Point 18
may seem excessively harsh to those who are absent of understanding in exactly how injurious the unscrupulous practices of usury and speculator profiteering is to the people… Usury, or rather issuing debt (via IOU) with attached interest, is not the exchange or loan of money… it is the demand of payment from one party (the Creditor) – for which they gave or forfeited absolutely nothing – from another party (the Debtor), who is required to extract affluence to service the greater interest first, before even reducing the principle, which is only based on an inequivalent, minimal fraction of a reserved asset (Fractional Reserve Lending). When this is done on a large scale, on a national scale, in the Millions and Billions, it is nothing but economic rape and enslavement of a nations people, who are ordered to exchange their time, their effort, their labour, their creativity, ingenuity, productivity and their time away from family, to give all the fruit of their efforts to economic racketeers, to self-licensed loan sharks, who gave them nothing in the first instance except an accounting entry of debt – a flick of a pen… this is precisely what Point 11 of the NSDAP’s program is referring to- “The abolition of incomes unearned by work.”
This infinite debt system, of interest on interest (demand for everything in exchange for nothing) is the ONLY CAUSE of endless inflation; and the worlds so-called Leaders, who contract these International Financiers, through promise to service their demand, do not produce anything. So where do the worlds so-called Leaders (middle-men) extract payment from to serve the International Financiers? Of course the people, the producers, who are the only source of affluence from which it can be extracted and, as the effect of interest on interest continually increases the debt demand, newly invented and increased taxes, fees, levy’s, tolls, fines, schemes and the general increase in the cost of everything, is the only way the Leaders can create increasing revenue to meet the International Financiers interest-debt demands… thus, continually reducing the value of the currency.
Is it fair or ethical to get something for nothing, through legalised theft demand? What about getting everything for nothing? Who in their right mind would think anyone who has risked nothing and given nothing, has the right to demand from another almost all the benefits of everything they’ve produced and created? What could benefit the people if all the fruits of their efforts were reinvested back into the peoples interests (by the billions), opposed to continually flowing into the pockets of the debt creators, the self-licensed loan sharks, who offered nothing?
This is a crime, a theft, so massive, so incomprehensible against all people, depriving them of the reward of their efforts and in most cases, depriving them of their most basic needs to live…
This is a crime against humanity!
So is Point 18 excessively harsh considering the scale of theft, deprivation, poverty imposition and enslavement? Is it Persecution to be denied the legal ability to continue wide-spread economic enslavement and theft, from the many to the few? Is it Persecution to out-law individuals from being able to conduct crimes against humanity under the threat of punishment? This writer thinks not! The reader can come to their own conclusion.

Anti-Semitic States…?

The Worker reports that “Anti-Semitic States” [are burdened with debt], colloquially suggesting that a national, political institution (a ‘State’), holds a racial ideological bias, on behalf of all individuals under that political system, which would include Jews themselves? Whether today’s Jews of European origin are in fact Semites, is for a different discussion. In any event, the clarification of what pertains to an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ by the self-proclaimed Jewish Financiers, continues to be pursuant to economic policies and who has control over a nations policies.

Through the vote of the German people, Hitler won against the Communists in Germany, he threw out the Bankers and their fraudulent credit systems from the nation, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour (not speculative gold), developed immense public works programs for employment and installed tight controls on prices and wages – income for the German people which he increased by 10.9%. Stock markets were also controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators; as such, Germany’s Reichsmark could not be speculated against on the international markets and Germany’s sovereign currency was not part of the Jewish financiers international usury debt system.
Mussolini’s Italy worked similarly with its own economic system, including expropriatory tax on war profits and large scale public works, thus, was also considered an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ with Japan later following a close third.

As a ‘State’ in the political spectrum, is generally applied to policies which implementations are mostly related to economics; and as the self described Jewish Financiers claim it was they who were being Persecuted by said State, it would appear, by their own definition, that an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not give the Jewish Financiers free reign over their nations people and productivity, nor legislative capacity for their economic debt slavery systems.
A nation not enslaved by usurious debt to the International Jewish Financiers, thus not under its control, is somehow Anti-Semitic?

Burdened with debt…?

great-gold-heist_1933_shadowWas it not all nations who were involved in WWI that were burdened with [war] debt? Was it not this war debt that spurred the manipulated Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929, which grew into the Great Depression of longevity through to the late 1930’s? Who benefited from this great suffering of peoples from all nations around the world, buying up everything for a penny on the pound? Who used this manipulated scenario to steal all the Americans gold, with the excuse it needed to be confiscated to the private shareholders of the Federal Reserve in order to revive from the Great Depression – facilitated by FDR’s Executive Order 6102, better-known as the Great Gold Heist of 1933? Who were the War Profiteers, Market Speculators and International Financiers that could have foreseen and benefited from such a war and resulting international economic catastrophe? The reader can perhaps speculate themselves to find that answer?

It was many of the western nations which were also still laden with WWI debt and could not pay it at the time (and thanks to interest on interest, are still paying for it today). But unlike Jewish Bolshevik Russia, following the so-called Russian Revolution (rather, Jewish usurpation of Russia) – conveniently, a mid-WWI coup d’etat – National Socialist Germany did not abandon the WWI debt and was making good on the payments. The Jewish Bolshevik USSR – for some reason(?) – wasn’t subjected to a credit recall like other nations? Special nepotistic favouritism by the creditors perhaps? However, Germany did not have gold reserves, they were stolen by the All-lies during WWI, but somehow, after total blame for WWI, accompanied by the astronomical reparation payments (“Tribute Madness” as Hitler referred), civil war, the Great Depression which the entire world was suffering and the greatest hyperinflation a nation has ever been subjected to in history, began to thrive economically and prosper above all other nations; and unemployment was near eradicated from over 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% by the end of 1935, regardless of the WWI debt.
Was this just some economic accident, a miracle, perhaps an unexplainable ‘Economic Miracle’ as the victor economists would have us believe? Or was it simply ‘Economic Logic’ facilitated by a well considered and planned Economic Reform?

With the differing national economic formats, it might beg the question also; why couldn’t the Allies make good on their WWI payments? Who was it they were actually indebted to – therefore controlled by? Were these industrious nations not able to manage their own currencies and productivity, to find a way to feed their people? Despite the invisible debt, did they not have vast resources and the physical capacity to at least grow food, thereby creating work to produce it?
Of course, if external entities control a nations currency, control the gold reserves (or confiscated it), therefore controlling the value of currency based on the fractional gold standard (which in-turn makes it a commodity of speculation in itself), then these entities which have issued the debt (IOU imposition) dictate where any revenue or surplus – if any – will be directed… Obviously the International financiers, in the interests of humanity and good will, did not (and will not) find it in their hearts to forego this debt created from a flick of a pen, to direct future revenue back to the people. The debtors, being beholden to the currency creators, the creditors, the self-licensed loan sharks, then offer the nations public assets to service the unpaid debt (credit recall), thus making the International Financiers the owners of those countries National productivity, manufacturing, infrastructure and utilities etc. (commonly disguised as Privatisation) who in-turn, ultimately charge the people for the use of their own public services they built… Unfortunately, post-privatisation, the people no longer receive the affluence generated from their own collective productivity, as the former public services become private businesses for profit. Further, the International Financiers still demand the interest on interest be paid! But where would that revenue come from once the people lose the benefits of their privatised public services and works? Inflation and an endless creation of new and increased taxes. This is total theft and wealth extraction out of all nations who submit to the demands of the International Financiers, who are nothing but large scale Counterfeiters = Criminals!
I refer to Point 18 of the NSDAP Program.

So who would these external elements of fiat currency (debt) issuance be? Could it be the same self-described Jewish Financiers? Why would these Jewish Financiers, if not International Financiers, be interested in foreign states who have taken steps to implement their own sovereign economic systems, having to describe them as “Anti-Semitic States”?
In reflection of the economically crippled world of the day, the majority of nations had the suffering yolk of international war debt and results of commodity speculation around their necks, thus controlled and owned… but the few nations that broke free from this economic enslavement system, giving back to their own people, whilst still paying the debt, were the ones the world was told, were an evil threat to humanity, had war declared upon them and were labelled Anti-Semitic.
“Anti-Semitic States burdened with debt”? No, States not under Jewish Financier control!

“In the exchange of telegrams from the 1939 -1940 period,
the British were ready to negotiate peace, if
Germany returned to the Gold Standard.”
∼ Captain J. Creagh-Scott, 1947


Jewry faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Austria…?

The Persecution narrative which had been peddled throughout the world in regard to European Jews, was not only a repetitive escalation of propaganda since the 1933 Jewish Declaration of War against Germany, but common propaganda prior to the Third Reich and beyond; even claiming Jewish Persecution under the Jewish coup government that usurped Empirical Russia (aka Russian Revolution), persecuted by their co-religionists, even though under U.S.S.R. law Anti-Semitism was punishable by death?
So is there any logical claim that Jewry was subject to persecution by Rumania as an Anti-Semitic State? Rumania was not allied with Germany or any other state at this time, it sought to maintain neutrality and cordial international relations. Poland had its own inner ethnic turmoil, social and employment problems, but was not allied with Germany either. However, with the cordial and progressive efforts Hitler had made toward diplomatic relations, the late First Marshall of Poland, Jozef Pilzudski and Adolf Hitler did sign a German-Polish non Aggression Pact in 1934, agreeing to forego military conflict for a period of 10 years and Germany recognising Polands borders… Unfortunately, Marshall Pilzudski died in 1935. Poland had historically been used by Allied states to incite war and border conflict – a cordial relationship with Germany would not have been pleasing to the International Financiers and war mongers, therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State.
Hitler speaks on German-Polish Peace here.


Despite Rumania’s 1921 Little Entente alliance in defense of potential Hungarian territorial ambitions, an agreement to supposedly safeguard against any restoration by the Habsburgs in response the Versailles Treaty and, the previous 1926 military pact with France, via the 1921 Act, King Carol II was caught in a sphere of power struggles and desired to stay neutral as much as possible. However, it too had communist political party conflict, internal ethnic turmoil from sizable ethnic minorities, border disputes, along with its much sought after natural resources, especially oil. Germany’s contract with Royal Dutch Shell, via its pro-Nationalist CEO, Henri Deterding, who had contracts with Rumanian oil too, saw the commodity speculators not impressed with the growing German-Rumanian diplomatic relations that were unfolding, especially after the Little Entente’s complete disbandment in 1938 – therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State. King Carol’s Rumania became ripe for social turmoil and movements, to keep Romania with state weakening internal strife, so as to not side with, or trade with Germany.

Austria? Since the end of WWI, the Austrian people who had arbitrarily been subject to the dissection of the German/Austro-Hungarian Empire, via the Versailles dictat and the Treaty of Saint Germain, had desired to re-join the German Reich and even more eagerly, since Germany began to prosper under National Socialism, while they themselves suffered in debt and poverty. But in defiance of the peoples right to self-determination, the merger was forbidden by the WWI All-lies! Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933. Austria too was in political, social and economic turmoil, with revolutionary movements and even civil war in 1934. Dollfuss eventually dissolved parliament and made himself dictator, outlawing movements against him. He was a conservative, anti-Communist and attempted to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism. He was assassinated during a 1934 attempted coup d’etat, the July Putsch and his successor, Kurt Schuschnigg, followed closely in his format. The growing national feeling to unite once again with Germany, would have been an anxious anticipation for the Jewish Financiers. So to excite international condemnation of Austria, by defamatory accusations of an Anti-Semitic State, served as a strategic psychological precursor for international support for war, whether it be military or economic warfare. Unlike in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still conducting their usurious financial business in Austria, but only 3 months after the above financial war plan was announced, 99.71% of the people turned out and 99.73% of the those Austrian people voted to rejoin the Reich in an April 10, 1938 Referendum. On the same day, another Referendum was held in Germany to ask the volk if they wished to rejoin Austria too. Of the 99.5% of the people who turned out, 99.8% of the German people agreed to unite again with their Austrian brothers and sisters… The Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed that same week, with all of its assets seized by the Reich government… the act of an apparent Anti-Semitic State against corrupt Financiers

Adolf Hitler Speaks At Heldenplatz In Vienna 15 March 1938
in the unification of Germany and Austria.

They may find their very existence threatened…?

The self-described Jewish Financiers and Leaders of International Jewry, felt that strongly about their systems and economic positions of extreme power being potentially replaced, that not only did they declare a world-wide economic boycott on Germany in 1933 – which had no long term effect once Germany took control of its own economy – but 5 years later wanted to target nations who might establish their own sovereign currencies and trade practices along with Germany too. They stated this financial war would “be fought on the worlds stock exchanges,” but as we have already established above, Germany’s Reichsmark was not part of the Jewish Financiers usury system and therefore could not be speculated against on international markets and the German stock markets were also tightly controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators. So whose very existence were they now threatening? The Polish? The Rumanians? The Austrians?
As we’ve witnessed over many generations, when these international economic players impose Blockades, Boycotts and Sanctions (same effect – different titles) against various nations people, their very existence is actually threatened and ultimately millions upon millions of civilian people have starved to death, or by disease and illness due to not having access to sanitary and medical supplies. This is the inhumane extent that International Jewry are prepared to go to, in order to keep their financial power over nations and peoples.

However, was this £500,000,000 (an estimated $52.6 Trillion USD today) actually going to be used purely on the world stock exchanges? Considering that the New York Stock Exchange in 2011 alone, measured Market Capitalisation (USD Billions) at 14,242; and Trade Value (USD Billions) at 20,161; then one could speculate where this finance would be directed.
Another aspect to consider is the Stock Market Crash of 1929 had reduced the value in all capital just 9 years earlier…

The £500,000,000 was clearly an extremely excessive amount of wealth in the day, to be held by one group or organisation, as the Worker reported that; ‘The leaders of international Jewry [who met in a village near Geneva] expected no trouble in raising such a fund – which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers and obviously this kind of excessive economic power would not be relinquished with honour, or without a fight. The owners (or confiscators) of gold did actually do very well from the 1929 crash, as the price of a single ounce of gold rose from just $291 an ounce in 1929, to $539 in 1939… how speculatively lucky for those who held confiscated the gold?

Coincidentally, a year later, the Cairns Post reported on July 8, 1939 (3 months before the outbreak of war – allegedly a surprise invasion by Germany), that the Governors of the Bank of England had planned for a secret gold vault to store, yes, quite the coincidence, £500,000,000 worth of gold, for war securities.

SECRET VAULT FOR £500,000,000

Governors of the Bank of England have drawn up plans for transporting £500,000,000 – of the nations’s gold reserve to a secret vault in the country in the event of war.
This vault is hundreds of miles from London, and comprises a bomb-proof safe deposit. The convoy, will be escorted by an armed guard of both police and soldiers
The gold represents Britain’s staying power-the basis on which war loans might be raised, and the purchasing power which will ensure supplies of food and raw materials from overseas.

Where was this funding spent? Was anything actually spent?

Let’s use one nation for an example… The American mobilisation for WWII at the end of 1941, had moved approximately ten million people out of the civilian labour force and into the war. Government-financed capital spending accounted for only 5% of the annual U.S. investment in industrial capital in 1940; but by 1943, it had increased to 67% of all U.S. investment.

Bernard Baruch was yet another Jewish financier, stock investor and political consultant. As a partner in A.A. Housman & Company, his earnings and commissions enabled him to buy a seat on the New York Stock Exchange. There he amassed a fortune before the age of 30 by profiting from speculation in the market. By 1910, he had become one of Wall Street’s best-known financiers. In a treasonous display of conflict of interest, he was appointed Chief Advisor to both war-time U.S. Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt on all economic matters; and during WWII Baruch controlled 351 of the most important branches of American heavy industry. He was on the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense and, in 1918, he was the chairman of his new War Industries Board, which managed the US’ economic mobilisation during WWI. He also served as a staff-member at the Versailles conference in France.
For his work in WWI, Baruch was awarded the Army Distinguished Service Medal which cited, in part; Baruch, a United States Civilian, for exceptionally meritorious and distinguished services to the Government of the United States, in a duty of great responsibility during World War I, in the organization and administration of the War Industries Board and in the coordination of allied purchases in the United States. By establishing a broad and comprehensive policy for the supervision and control of the raw materials, manufacturing facilities, and distribution of the products of industry, he stimulated the production of war supplies, coordinated the needs of the military service and the civilian population, and contributed alike to the completeness and speed of the mobilization and equipment of the military forces and the continuity of their supply.”


Winston Churchill and Bernard Baruch

When the United States entered WWII, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a Special Adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization. He supported what was known as a “Work or Fight” bill. Baruch advocated the creation of a permanent Super-agency similar to his old Industries Board of WWI. His theory ‘elevated the role of Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists in determining what was needed and who would produce it.’ But did the U.S. have surplus to be able to afford all this war time spending to these Civilian Businessmen, especially after the Great Depression? If not, where was the vast finance for it sourced from? Which Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists profiteered from this great war-time expenditure and investment in war production? And on top of that, who would the war debt, with interest on interest be paid to at the end of the war? Has it even been paid off today?

In yet another economic coincidence on the international stage of profiteering and war debt, on February 12, 1949, the Townsville Daily Bulletin reported, that foreign borrowers had defaulted on their payments and interest, to the tune of… you guessed it… £500,000,000.

£500,000,000 DEFAULT

LONDON, Feb. 11. – Foreign borrowers who have defaulted in their payments of capital and interest, now owe British investors nearly £500 million.
The Council of Foreign Bondholders says this in its annual report.
The council protects the interests of holders of foreign government, State or municipal obligations issued in Britain.


Considering that we know Germany’s currency could hardly be effected by international market speculators in 1938, and due to the self sufficiency of the 4 Year Plan having succeeded exponentially, we learn that it is the people with money to spend, is what in fact creates national economic growth. Only the public demand for produce and manufacturing (resulting in more paid employment for further spending and demand), can stimulate national economies… which is the effect of compounding affluence, opposed to compounding interest-debt/extraction – it is the very difference between a positive affluence based currency, opposed to a negative debt based currency. Demand cannot be created by a poor people without money and no employment in manufacturing or production can be developed, unless there is people wanting the goods and can actually buy it. No manufacturer or producer will grow or make more than what is in demand, thus, will not need further employees.
This type of economic growth can never be achieved with a debt based currency system, as all the affluence is continually flowing from the many people, to the few loan-sharks. Such is the format of Jewish usury systems all over the world… the economic enslavement of all people, never to rise above negative debt, to positive affluence.

The mechanics of the Third Reich’s economic system, saw the nation come from being the most impoverished and starving during the world-wide Great Depression, to soaring in prosperity above all others, almost instantaneously. Jewish economists and publishers wouldn’t dare explain the simplicity of these economic reforms to the rest of the worlds nations, thus claimed them to be a miracle, an “Economic Miracle” – No such miracle exists!

The self-described International Jewish Financiers, describe states with such economies as “Anti-Semitic States” given their policy to not facilitate Jewish usury practices or, economic control and enslavement over their nation and people. These Jewish El-ites absolutely did consider these policies as a threat to their existence (perhaps even Persecution), an existence based on parasiticism, even a war on their parasiticism – and they did indeed respond in kind.
If the economic systems of the so-called “Anti-Semitic States” had been adopted by other nations – which it certainly would have in time, if they were left alone – then their parasitic existence would have disintigrated, all their hoards of useless inanimate gold wouldn’t have helped them and they may have even had to work to support themselves. Such could not be tolerated and the answer to this was not to leave them alone, but… Total War! Declared twice by the self styled International Jewry, well before 1939.

However, they not only destroyed nations and people they couldn’t initially control, but prospered further with even more economic enslavement of those who fought their war for them. Was it really £500,000,000 to be played on the stock market, against nations whose economies could not be effected by it? Or was it the basis for so-called war loans?
The Worker did state that their “very existence might be threatened,” but it was rather by imposing debt currency onto various peoples Governments, to build war machines for their actual physical destruction.
Not only did the the future generations have this war-debt enslavement put around their necks before they were even born, but this expenditure resulted in Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists (who decided who would produce it), thrive in the biggest manufacturing boom in history, as well as thriving in the rebuilding and construction of the destroyed countries post-war.
Moreover, they not only achieved great speculative profit, great debt revenue, great business in manufacturing and construction, destruction of millions of people and families all over the world, destruction of ancient historical and irreplaceable architecture; but to top it all off, they got to keep all the gold too… not that anyone saw this half a billion pounds worth of gold that the debt currency was supposedly created on – we’ll just have to take their word for it that they had it… in any event, they didn’t lend gold out, or give any away, just created debt on its purported existence, so they risked and gave NOTHING!

We are led to believe that gold is a real asset to regulate a consistent value in money, but how does that work in reality in a debt-based currency system?
The International Jewish Financiers [allegedly] held half a billion pounds worth of gold, to which they gave to no one (risked and forfeited nothing). A half a billion pounds worth of debt was issued to various Governments based on its [alleged] existence. The Governments transferred/spent this debt-credit on armaments in the businesses of Civilian Industrialists, debt which then transformed into being half a billion pounds worth of revenue for the recipients – who are likely the same international financiers and stock investors, such as Bernard Baruch. These stock investors then received great commissions and wealth through the increased value of their shares, due to the rapid sales and manufacturing in their industrial businesses.

To summarise; They gave nothing away, they imposed half a billion pounds worth of debt, they received half a billion pounds worth of revenue from it on top of the gold they [allegedly] held, their businesses boomed and stock shares grew in value (great speculation)… and they end up demanding that they are still owed another half a billion pounds worth of revenue, due to Government default on debt payment… This is more than tripling their net worth, as well as injecting more debt-based currency into the entire currency pool – reducing the currency’s value thereby.
Remember, this does not even include the infinite interest (usury) on half a billion pounds.

Risked Nothing – Gave Nothing – Took Everything


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Jewish Elites persecute Jewish Citizens to create hysteria for an International Jurisdiction of Impunity in Palestine

Persecution propaganda for the reward of the Palestinian usurpation agenda

In a 1976 interview, Harold Rosenthal, Senior Administrative Aide, to high ranking US Senator Jacob Javits, was recorded stating the following…

“…Anyway, the Jews at that time had a very wise Rabbi leader, a world leader, and his advice was respected throughout the world. He said that the Jews must pretend to become Christians and bide their time and make real sacrifices if necessary.

We have always been ready to sacrifice a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership. This was the plan of the Jews who instigated WW II. Some Jews were sacrificed so that the “persecution” propaganda could continue. It is a small price and there is nothing wrong with that.”

He later continued;
“You know we laugh about the six million story, just like the story that Christ was a Jew and the God’s Chosen People story. This should show people that we have a solidarity like none other in the world. Jews have a closeness to other Jews whom they have never seen or perhaps even heard of.”

Chaim Weizmann, President of the Zionist Organization and first President of Israel. Weizmann was in the United States at the time of the Israeli Declaration of Independence and convinced President Truman to Officially recognise the illegal State within hours.

Abridged narration of investigative journalist and author David Morrisons’ book; Heroes, Antiheroes And The Holocaust


There isn’t enough space or time to present all the machinations of the leaders of American Jewry, so we will focus around just one, the leader of ‘Reform Judaism’ and the ‘American Jewish Congress’, Rabbi Stephen Wise (actually, Weisz).
His closest friend and correspondent was Justice Felix Frankfurter. Of Felix, Jerry Rabow in his book, 50 Jewish Messiahs writes;

“United States Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter is reported to have received a copy of Eva Frank’s portrait from his mother, a descendent of the Prague [Sabbataean] Frankist family.”

pp. 208 – The five or six Supreme Court justices that attended the performance on behalf of European Jewry, were deeply impressed but it never crossed their mind that it was up to them to do something about it. They figured that if Frankfurter hadn’t done anything, there was little to do.

Frankfurter is quoted saying;
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the scenes.”
~ Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

Regarding Stephen Wise, Rabbi Antelman provides this description in, To Eliminate The Opiate Volume II

“Consider Stephen Wise, head of the Reform movement in the United States during World War II. As the slaughter was going on in Europe, Wise was more interested in his own gratification. Wise was both a Communist and a Sabbataean Jew.”

Wise being a Communist is attested to by Maurice Malkin, a member of the Communist Party who returned to Judaism. In his book, Return To My Father’s House, he states Wise was a Sabbataean, as was also shown in Helen Lawrenson’s book, Stranger At The Party. In her chronicle of a sexual encounter with the so-called Rabbi Wise, she describes how Wise had sex with her in his office on his conference table, and quoted the verse from Psalms which Sabbataeans did when engaged in sexual intercourse. – p 217

The following abridgement of David Morrison’s chronicle on Stephen Wise, highlights the deliberate condemnation to suffering of as many European Jews as possible in war torn Germany, evoking the desired global sympathy.

pp 107 – Wise wrote to Albert Einstein attempting to displace blame for Roosevelt’s silence on the alleged “German atrocities” on the Warburgs:

I must say to you in strictest confidence that I saw the President yesterday…His first word was, “Max Warburg wrote to me lately that things were so bad in Germany that nothing could be done.” The President threw up his hands as if to say, “Well, if Max thinks nothing can be done, then nothing can be done.’”

pp 110 – Steven Wise circulated, in January 1937, an internal memorandum to the Governing Councils in the World Jewish Congress making it clear;

“in the most emphatic terms that it cannot be a party to any scheme of the Polish government which looks to a place for Polish-German emigrants.”

pp 113 – At the same time, he circulated this memorandum, he wrote to a New York congressman who intended to introduce legislation to ease restrictions on emigration to America:

“I have every reason to believe that any effort that is made at this time to ease the immigration laws will result in a serious wave of anti-semitic feeling in this country.”

pp 120 – After [the suggestion that *(nj)] Austria fell, Wise met with representatives of the American Jewish Committee and some non-Jewish groups. The meeting came in the wake of an attempt by New York Congressman, Samuel Dickstein, to introduce legislation that would allow unused refugee ‘quotas’ to be allocated to those leaving Germany. The gathered agreed unanimously:

“The organizations represented at the conference will take the position that the proposed legislation is inadvisable.”

pp 128 – In the week following Kristallnacht [false flag *(nj)], the British offered to give up most of the 65,000 quota for British citizens to emigrate to the United States to increase places for Jewish refugees instead.
Under Secretary Of State Sumner Welles responded:

“I reminded the Ambassador that the President stated there was no intention on the part of his government to increase the quota for German nationals. I added that it was my strong impression that the responsible leaders among American Jews would be the first to urge that no change in the present quota for German Jews be made.”

The influential Samuel Rosenman (Roosevelt’s Speech-writer), one of the “responsible” Jewish leaders sent Roosevelt a memorandum telling him that…

“…an increase of quotas is wholly inadvisable. It will merely produce a ‘Jewish problem’ in the countries increasing the quota.”

pp 129 – The General Jewish Council (established by the B’nai B’rith, JLC and AJC in 1938) met the following day and spent hours of debate on an agenda, which did not include the Kristallnacht. When the leaders of the American Jewish Congress addressed the issue, they did so by adopting a resolution giving the following advice to their constituents across the country:

“Resolved that it is the present policy of the ‘General Jewish Council’ that there should be no parades, public demonstrations or protests by Jews.”

Stephen Wise, on American Jewish Congress stationary, sent out a report to his members labeled:

“In behalf of the American Jewish Congress I send you this report clarifying our policy in meeting the present crisis in the life of our fellow Jews in Germany. The silence of the American Jewish Congress should not be regarded as a lack of activity on our part. It is the result of well considered policy.”

pp 145 – In the wake of Kristallnacht, New York Senator [Robert F.] Wagner introduced legislation to allow 20,000 German Jewish children into the United States. Stephen Wise testified before the legislation committee:

“If there is any conflict between our duty to those children and our duty to our country, our country comes first; and if children cannot be helped, they cannot be helped.”
(Reynolds saw no difficulty in accommodating the children in the United States. The legislation, without support from the Jewish leadership, got nowhere.)

If the children were not destined from Germany to Palestine, they were not destined to live. The same thing happened when choosing the Polish Jews fit to live/emigrate.

pp 154 – A letter to American Jews on United Jewish Appeal (established 1939) stationery continued to support the ‘selected‘ immigration of Jews to Palestine, despite the fact that approximately 2.5 – 3 million Jews were [partly] in the reclaimed German territory and Jewish-Bolshevik/Soviet occupied east Poland:

“Selectivity is an inescapable factor in dealing with the problem of immigration to Palestine. By selectivity is meant the choice of young men and women who are trained in either agriculture or industry.”
[note: as Palestinian villagers were being slaughtered (for settler replacement), there was a need for extra labour to till the fields. Other tactics such as false flag terrorist attacks in surrounding Arab nations were used to fear Middle Eastern Jews into relocating to Palestine, predominantly, Iraqi Jews, while blaming the attacks on their Muslim countrymen]

pp 178 – During the summer of 1942, Gerhart Riegner purportedly sent a cable to the State Department detailing the [alleged] German plan for exterminating European Jewry. At the behest of Under Secretary Of State, Sumner Welles (who was forced to resign in 1943, after Homosexual misconduct), Wise apparently didn’t tell anyone.

pp 187- In the February, 1943 issue of Wise’s American Jewish Congress publication, Opinion, there is an extensive review of the Hitler era to date, with articles contributed by 52 people. No one mentioned the word ‘rescue.’

pp 200 – When Anthony Eden (Deputy Prime Minister to Winston Churchill), was in Washington he met with Wise and told him nothing could be done…Eden’s private secretary Oliver Harvey noted in his diary:

“Unfortunately, A.E. loves Arabs and hates Jews.”

pp 212 – There was an appeal from Italy which stated that an appeal from the pope might stop the deportation of Jews from Italy. The Zionist Emergency Committee did nothing about this matter. A meeting wasn’t even called.

pp 217 – Stephen Wise declared:

“We are Americans first. Nothing else that we are, whether by faith or race, qualifies our Americanism…The way to save Jews, is to unite the Jewish people behind the victory program of President Roosevelt.”

However, in 1933, Rabbi Wise said:

“I am not an American citizen of Jewish faith. I am a Jew. I have been an American for sixty-three years, but I have been a Jew for 4000 years.”

pp 220 – A White House staffer recorded in his diary that,

“The President told us from his bedroom that he would not see the delegation of rabbis.”

Judge [Samuel] Rosenman (Roosevelt’s Speech-writer), who was also in the bedroom, said the group was not representative of the most thoughtful elements in Jewry. Rosenman’s statement to Roosevelt that…

“leading Jews of his acquaintance’ opposed the rabbis’ march.”


Rabbi Weizs psychologically riling up the the public over alleged ‘Jewish Persecution’ while never acting in any political capacity

pp 227 – While Wise sent private memos clearly stating they thought the migration of Jews was possible…in public they supported the Roosevelt administration’s steadfast assertion that apparently “Nothing could be done.”

pp 230 – Congressman Gillette recalled a visit to his office by Wise and a few of his colleagues:

“None of these gentlemen seemed to be enthusiastic for…the saving of the remnant of the Jewish people.”

pp 241 – Wise felt strongly that the Gillette legislation did not provide for the “proper type of commission.” With all that was known about the obstruction of the Jewish rescue by the State Department, Wise was lobbying to leave the issue in their hands…

Henry Morgenthau’s (Secretary of the Treasury) aide, Josiah Dubois (who played a major role in exposing governmental obstructions…), uncovered the State Department’s policy relevant to the issue of Jewish rescue…
The stunning title to the Dubois memorandum was:


Dubois pointed to the restrictions on visas as;

“the most glaring example of the use of the machinery of this government to actually prevent the rescue of Jews.”

pp 270 – The Roosevelt administration took the usual position that there be no special effort for Jewish refugees. Stephen Wise also saw no human course of action:

“The issue is in the hands of God.”


The Sabbatean Jewish leadership had no interest in improving conditions of any Jew, unless they wanted to go to the proposed new ‘Jewish State’ – those who did not, still served the ‘Persecution’ narrative.

Barry Chamish stated with anger,
“Any Jew who got on a boat, on a ship from Germany to anywhere in the world, the word was out diplomatically everywhere:
‘If that ship isn’t going to ‘Palestine’, you send these Jews back to their death.’ Worldwide! Ship after ship!. Every country! They don’t escape. They don’t like Palestine, they die!

David Morrison’s conclusions are too generous and slanted by the belief that the [only] 210,000 Jews in Germany were actually being deliberately persecuted (which was rejected by German-Jews themselves), but his scholarship is invaluable. He has added an essential contribution to the indisputable fact that America’s Jewish leaders, led by Stephen Wise (Weizs), purposely persecuted by proxy – through international hysteria propaganda – the Jews of western-destroyed Europe, in order to steer them to Palestine for the intention to establish the future impunitive State of Israel.


“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish State in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university of budding crooks.”
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

weizmann1Chaim Weitzman stated in a 1907 speech;
“The governments of the world will pay attention to us, only as they will ‘become convinced’ that we are capable of ‘Conquering Palestine’ through persistent practical work.
Political Zionism means, to make the ‘Jewish Question’ an ‘International Question.’ It means going to the nations and saying to them: “We need your help to achieve our aim; but we ourselves are doing all in our power to strengthen our position in the land, because we regard Palestine as our homeland.” We must explain Zionism to the governments in such a manner that they shall understand it as the Jews understand it.”
How the Palestinians understand it, was not proffered at all.


Rabbi Stephen Wise

Feature picture above: Rabbi Stephen Wise (Weizs), Austro-Hungarian Jewish immigrant to the US, both son and grandson to Rabbi’s, established the Free Synagogue movement, founded the NY Federation of Zionist Societies which led FAZ (Federation of American Zionists) and onto the Zionist Organisation of America and, he was President of the World Jewish Congress.

In 1893, Rabbi Weiz was appointed assistant to Rabbi Henry S. Jacobs of the Congregation B’nai Jeshurun, New York City, and later in the same year, minister to the same congregation. In 1900, he launched his career as the rabbi of Congregation Beth Israel in Portland, Oregon; typical of the activists of the Progressive Era, he attacked “many of the social and political ills of contemporary America.” In 1906, concerning another rabbinical appointment, Wise made a major break with the established Reform movement over the “question whether the pulpit shall be free or whether the pulpit shall not be free, and, by reason of its loss of freedom, reft of its power for good”; in 1907 he established his Free Synagogue, starting the “Free Synagogue” movement.

The Rabbi was an early supporter of Zionism, and his support for, and commitment to Political Zionism was very atypical of Reform Judaism, which was historically and decidedly non-Zionist since the Pittsburgh Platform in 1885. He was a founder of the New York Federation of Zionist Societies in 1897, which led in the formation of the national Federation of American Zionists (FAZ), a forerunner of the Zionist Organization of America. At the Second Zionist Congress (Basel, 1898), he was a delegate and secretary for the English language. Weizs served as honorary secretary of FAZ, in close cooperation with Theodor Herzl (“Father of Zionism”) until the latter’s death in 1904.

Weizs, joining U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, and others laid the groundwork for a democratically elected nationwide organization of ‘ardently Zionist’ Jews, ‘to represent Jews as a group and not as individuals’. In 1918, following national elections, this Jewish community convened the first American Jewish Congress in Philadelphia’s historic Independence Hall.

In 1902, Weizs officiated as first vice-president of the Oregon State Conference of Charities and Correction. In 1903 he was appointed Commissioner of Child Labor for the State of Oregon, and founded the Peoples’ Forum of Oregon. These activities initiated a lifelong commitment to Jewish issues, stemming from his embrace of a variety of Jewish Zionist movements.

In keeping with the progression of Cultural Marxism, in 1914, Weizs co-founded the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). In A History of Jews in America, historian Howard Sachar wrote, “In 1914, Professor Emeritus Joel Spingarn of Columbia University became chairman of the NAACP and recruited for its board such Jewish leaders as Jacob Schiff, Jacob Billikopf, and Rabbi Stephen Wise (Weizs).” Other Jewish co-founders included Julius Rosenwald, Lillian Wald, and Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch.

Louise Waterman Weizs, Jewish activist and wife of World Jewish Congress President Stephen Samuel Wise, addressing the War Emergency Conference of the WJC in Atlantic City in 1944

In 1922, Weiz founded the Jewish Institute of Religion, an educational center in New York City to train rabbis in Reform Judaism. It was merged into the Hebrew Union College a year after his death. In 1922 Weizs was one of the founding trustees of the Palestine Endowment Funds, Inc., along with Julian Mack.

When the Federation of American Zionists (FAZ) was originally established, Weizs was appointed the position of Secretary. After the organisation transformed into the Zionist Organisation of America, Rabbi Wise fulfilled positions as both President and Vice President during his lifetime.

Rabbi Weizs was President Franklin D. Roosevelt personal adviser and led his think tank (along with many of his other kinsmen). FDR turned to Mr Weizs before making any decisions concerning Jewish matters (and others), which included all of WWII. In addition, Weizs was also adviser to previous President Wilson.


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.


WWII: Espionage and the US funding of the Conquering Communists of Europe

Feature Image: Harry Dexter White (Weit), U.S. Treasury Department official, Communist and active Agent of Soviet Espionage

The covert European Revolution and how it was funded

In 1943, the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) was established (2years before the U.N. was founded) – clearly an organisation with post-war objectives. When the war ended, UNRRA set up “Displaced Persons” camps. In 1946, British General Sir Frederick Morgan, was Chief of Operations of the UNRRA in Germany (before his dismissal). He stated at a press conference in Frankfurt and charged, that an organised Jewish group was sponsoring an exodus of Jews from Poland into the U.S. zone of Germany… “They certainly do not look like a persecuted people. I believe they have got a plan, a positive plan, to get out of Europe.”

220px-frederick_e-_morganThey had an abundance of money, to a great extent U.S. occupation marks, printed by the Jewish Bolsheviks, who had been given the U.S. printing plates. General Morgan not only knew of the arming and military training many “Displaced Persons” were receiving before traveling to Palestine (many forced), he also knew – besides the abundance of U.S. Occupational Marks, that a great proportion of the $3.7 billion UNRRA funding contributed [by U.S. $2.7 billion, Britain $625 million and Canada $135 million and other sources] was being used purely for Zionists agenda’s. His position in Germany was eliminated following publication of “off the record” comments he made concerning incompetence and corruption within UNRRA, which was mainly concerning the diversion of UNRRA resources to support Zionist ambitions in Palestine.
Morgan was appalled at the corruption, so much so, that he wrote;
“…to have been rejected for such service (to a corrupt organisation),
I have always felt to have been a high honour.”


Jews from Poland were pouring into Western Germany from the East and passing ‘through’ the UNRRA operated camps. In these camps many of them received paramilitary tactical training, for the invasion of Palestine, from uniformed, non-commissioned officers (many Haganah and Palmach Operatives].
This immense army of carpetbaggers who followed the American and British armies into Germany, were joined by a similar army of occupiers from the Soviet east. These occupiers wore British, American and Soviet uniforms, but all displayed the same ethnicity.

In the wake of the advancing American forces, a sinister fifth column followed, the members of which in ninety-nine per cent of the cases, were not Americans. This vengeful army was made up of emigrants from Eastern European countries, of black market operators from Brooklyn ghettos, of Czech, Polish and Hungarian Jews.

Simultaneously, as the conquering flood began to move eastwards, a mass of several hundred thousand released from the internment camps surged toward Poland, Hungary, Romania and Yugoslavia, to become officers in the Communist police forces and other terror organizations; and to assume judicial powers in the people’s tribunals, so as to be able to pass sentence upon innocent people in an orgy of purported retribution. They filled all major and minor posts in the C.I.C., organised according to the Morgenthau Plan, they swarmed in the O.S.S. (predecessor of the CIA), in the various commissions searching for [“alleged”] war criminals, as well as in the American security organisations. They became mayors of German towns and commandants of P.O.W. camps (administering more cruelly, the very things they had accused as crimes against Hitler) and they administered [now] LaGuardias U.N.N.R.A. They occupied key positions in the American forces, thus exercised control over them and, refugees swarmed into the best hotels and the remaining vacant homes of the expelled German citizens – citizens (men, women and children) who were either tortured in camps, bestially raped, murdered or sold off into slavery around the world.
These refugees were welcomed with open arms by the Soviet MVD who were in control of the Eastern European countries… who financially facilitated these purportedly ‘poor persecuted people’ or rather, “Displaced Persons” with US Occupational Marks and/or U.N.N.R.A. funding.

General George Patton wrote scathingly on how “Displaced Person,” meaning “Jews,” were living it up as virtual privileged saints in Germany after the war.

But where did they get the abundance of U.S. Occupation Marks?

Enter, Harry Dexter White.

Harry Dexter White
(Weit), youngest child of Jewish Lithuanian immigrants to America, Joseph Weit and Sarah Magilewski, was an American economist, senior U.S. Treasury department official and an active agent of Soviet espionage. He was the senior American official at the 1944 Bretton Woods conference, at which he dominated and imposed his vision of post-war Financial Institutions, over various objections of the British. After the war, White was a major architect of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.

Harry Dexter White (left) with John Maynard Keynes at the Bretton Woods Conference

White was a dedicated internationalist and his energies were directed at continuing the ‘Grand Alliance‘ (often called the “Strange Alliance” as it united the world’s greatest capitalist, colonial and communist states – the U.S., U.K. and Soviet Russia).
As head of the “INDEPENDENTLY-FUNDED” Office of Monetary Research, White was able to appoint staff without the normal civil service regulations or background inquiries.

He himself was also just simply appointed assistant to Henry Morgenthau, Jr., the Secretary of the Treasury, to act as liaison between the Treasury and the State Department on all matters bearing on foreign relations. He was also made responsible for the ‘management and operation of the Exchange Stabilization Fund’ which was not subject to any legislative oversight (established in 1934). He eventually came to be in charge of international matters for the Treasury, with access to extensive confidential information about the economic situation of the USA and its wartime allies.

According to Henry Morgenthau’s son, White was the principal architect of the Morgenthau Plan.
The Morgenthau Plan (signed by Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin), as authored by White, was to take all industry out of Germany, eliminate its armed forces, condemn at least two million Germans to slavery-like forced labour in Russia and convert the country into a pastoral community, in the process eliminating Germany’s economy and its ability to defend itself.
White opined that if the Russians needed two million German labourers to reconstruct their devastated areas, he saw nothing wrong with it; it was “in the interest” of Russia and even Germany that the labour force come from the ranks of the Gestapo, the S.S., the National Socialists party and the German people themselves.

“That’s not a punishment for crime,” he stated, “that’s merely a part of the reparations problem in the same way you want certain machines from Germany.”

Former President Herbert Hoover would in March 1947 remark;

“There is the illusion that the New Germany left after the annexations can be reduced to a ‘pastoral state’. It cannot be done unless we exterminate or move 25,000,000 people out of it.”

Dismantling of German heavy industry in the west, agreed upon at the Potsdam Conference, continued until 1951.


On March 20, 1945, State Department security officer, Raymond Murphy, interviewed Whittaker Chambers, a defecting Soviet. His notes record that Chambers identified White as “a member at large but rather timid”, who had brought various members of the American communist underground into the Treasury.

Senator William Jenner’s, Subversion in Government Departments Investigation-(Full report here), by the ‘Senate Internal Security Subcommittee’ (SISS), looked extensively into the problem of unauthorized and uncontrolled powers exercised by “non-elected officials” – specifically White. Part of its report looked into the implementation of Roosevelt administration policy and was published as the ‘Morgenthau Diary’ – The report stated;

“The concentration of Communist sympathizers in the Treasury Department, and particularly the Division of Monetary Research, is now a matter of record. White was the first director of that division; those who succeeded him in the directorship were Frank Coe [Executive Director of the Board of Economic Warfare and member of Silvermaster Spy Ring] and Harold Glasser [Spokesman of UNRRA and member of the Perlo Spy Ring]. Also attached to the Division of Monetary Research were William Ludwig Ullman, Irving Kaplan, and Victor Perlo [Head of Perlo Spy Ring]. White, Coe, Glasser, Kaplan, and Perlo were all identified as participants in the Communist conspiracy.”
[Most, also Members of the War Production Board]

The committee also heard testimony by Henry Morgenthau’s speech-writer, Jonathan Mitchell, that White had tried to persuade him that the Soviets had developed a system that would ‘Supplant Capitalism and Christianity.’

November 7, 1945, defecting Soviet espionage courier, Elizabeth Bentley, told investigators of the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), that in late 1942, or early 1943, she learned from Soviet spies, Nathan Gregory Silvermaster (Leader of the Silvermaster Spy Ring) and Ludwig Ullmann (assigned to the Pentagon and White’s Administrative Assistant) that one source, of the government documents they were photographing and passing on to her and NKVD spymaster, Jacob Golos (Bolshevik Revolutionary), was Harry Dexter White.

In 1953, Senator Joseph McCarthy and Eisenhower administration Attorney General, Herbert Brownell, Jr. revealed that the FBI had warned the Truman administration about White before the President appointed him to the IMF. Brownell made public the FBI’s November 8, 1945 letter to the White House warning about White and others, and revealed that the White House had received the FBI report on “Soviet Espionage in the United States,” including the White case, six weeks before Truman nominated White (Weit) to the IMF.

July 31, 1948, Bentley told the ‘House Committee on Un-American Activities’ that White had been involved in espionage activities on behalf of the Soviet Union during World War II and had passed sensitive Treasury documents to Soviet agents. Bentley said White’s colleagues passed information to her from him. In her 1953 testimony Bentley said that White was responsible for passing Treasury plates for printing Allied military marks in occupied Germany to the Soviets, who thereupon printed currency with abandon, sparking a black market and serious inflation throughout the occupied country, costing the U.S. tax payers a quarter of a billion of dollars. However the alternative explanation (and subsequent admission) that Treasury officials feared that denying Soviet use of the plates in their occupation sector would “endanger postwar cooperation.”

Bentley wrote in her 1951 autobiography that she had been “able through Harry Dexter White to arrange that the United States Treasury Department turn the actual printing plates over to the Russians”

Although several had accused Bentley of lying, Bentley’s testimony would later be corroborated by a memorandum found in Soviet archives after half a century. In it, Gaik Ovakimian, head of the American desk of the NKVD (for which Bentley worked), cites a report from New York (where Bentley was based) from April 14, 1944 (when Bentley was running the Silvermaster group) reporting that, “following our instructions” via Silvermaster, White had obtained “the positive decision of the Treasury Department to provide the Soviet side with the plates for engraving German occupation marks.”

On August 13, 1948, White testified before HUAC and denied being a communist. He died three days later of a heart attack, on August 16, 1948, age 55. An overdose of digitalis was reported as the cause of death.

Further Reading:
FBI Silvermaster File – here
The Morgenthau Plan: Directive (JCS) 1067 – here
‘Interlocking Subversion in Government Departments’ Report – here
Investigation of the House Committee on un-American Activities Committee – here
Ware Spy Ring – here
The Biggest Revolution You Never Heard Of: 1945 Europe – here
Hollywood Blacklist: Conspirators of Communist Propaganda in the Entertainment Industry – here
Waldorf Statement – here
Three former FBI Agents of American Business Consultants Inc. concerning ‘Red Fascists and their Sympathizers’ identifies 151 Entertainment Industry Professionals and On-Air Journalists of Communist Subversive Propaganda in, ‘Counter Attack’ – here
The ‘Red Channels’ List – here


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

harry weit - communist spy

Who Involved the U.S. in WWII When 83% of Americans Voted Against It?

Besides the Pearl Harbour False Flag, How did They Manipulate America into WWII? – A war 83% of Americans (according to the June 3rd, 1941, Gallup Poll results) were against and asserted they wished to remain uninvolved?

Protocol of the Elders of Zion – VII:6
“…In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan….

“We Jews,” as the spokesmen of this clannish nationalism might put it, “are well aware that in America, England, France and the Soviet Union, as well as in every other part of the world, the rule is: Judah must come first!
As long as the interests of America are identical with the interests of Old Testament ‘Zionism’, we will be good Americans, but as soon as our interests begin to conflict with the interests of America, we shall betray her too. Generally speaking, democracy suits us if and when it is led by as many Jews as possible. The so-called freedom of the press is good for us too, provided the descendants of the seed of Abraham, above all, can avail themselves of it. Yes! this freedom is a valuable thing, but only where we Jews are at liberty to do anything we like!”

Oh, you faint-hearted ones, who listen terror-stricken to the marching S.A. and S.S. troops; be not afraid! By now we are experts in undermining and capturing democracies. We are familiar with the methods of imposing our particular interests on the masses. America, the richest state of the Goyim is being shaken by mortal economic crisis. The time is ripe to start our all-out offensive, which, will also give political power into our hands. And ours will be a take-over of a more permanent character than that of Hitler. We are going to conquer America neither by arms nor by theories. We possess a reliable prescription to call down Nemesis on America. The fate of America was prescribed by our own Führer – Moses! Torah is our Mein Kampf!

This will be the year for sounding the Trumpets in America, where in George Washington’s time, the total number of Jews were a mere four thousand. But now our bankers, our socialists and our journalists will be blowing trumpets and, our ‘Brain-Trust’ will execute the New Deal at the expense of the American Pioneer-Population. Thereafter, the only remaining question will be: Whom are we going to put in the Presidential Chair at Washington?

“Those of you living in despair in your palatial residence in Wall Street or in 13th Street, as well as in the ghettos of Brooklyn and Bronx, must not doubt that we shall find our man, who will be a real match for Hitler, while at the same time, place political power over America into our hands. You need only read our directions in the Protocols.”
(The World Conquerors, p. 80-81)

Protocol X:
“Liberalism produced constitutional status, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the Goyim, namely despotism (autocracy)… then it was that we replaced the Ruler by a caricature of a government – by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet overture – our slaves. In the near future we shall establish elections, in favour of such presidents, as have in their past some dark undiscovered stain, some “Panama” or other – then they will be trustworthy agents for the accomplishment of our plans, out of fear of revelations…”

“Who will therefore, be the new President, who will place America in our hands and will execute our orders?”
His name is Franklin D. Roosevelt! – the late descendant of the Spanish Sephardim.

Fear not dear Franklin, our “Advisors” are now gathering around you, to support you in the decision making for all your future endeavors, which is at such a pivotal time in our world history. Felix Frankfurter from Vienna, Henry Morgenthau from Mannheim, Bernard Baruch from Könoigsberg and Albert Einstein from Berlin. Samuel Roseman who will write your speeches is there, so are our labour leaders; amongst them our compatriot Sidney Hillman who controls American labour in the Administration for you. There is David Dubinsky, also a fellow immigrant from Russia, who will transform the Christian workers into tax payers for Zionism.
The entourage we will provide you will consist exclusively of trustworthy men, such as La Guardia, Mayor of New York, a Jew from Fiume and, Alger Hiss, the protègè of Frankfurter and of Senator Lehman. Bernard Baruch will control the 351 most important branches of American industry, which will militarily equip the American boys to go fight against our cryptonite – National Socialism.
On behalf of America, Alger Hiss will conduct the talks with Stalin and, Einstein, Oppenheimer and David Lilienthal will produce the atomic bomb. As managers of the UNNRA, La Guardia and Herbert Lehman will help the intended future Jewish ‘Displaced Persons‘ of our coming war – a war which we will declare. Our appointed Henry Morgenthau Jr., Secretaty of the Treasury, will prepare a splendid plan for the extermination of the German people, based on the insightful authorship of our intellectual confidant, President of the ‘American Federation of Peace,’ Theodore Kaufman. Our own Mortiz Gomberg, will see to it that 18 million people from the countries of our opponent will become ‘Stateless’ in Europe, our trustworthy men will distribute $11 million worth of cheques to provide our Bolshevik counterparts with arms and Harry Dexter White will also give them U.S. occupation printing plates, to enable the ‘Displaced Persons’ to print with abandon, so they can be cashed-up to usurp all positions of European “Authority” after our boys of the O.S.S. summarily assassinate all who have opposed us – at the expense of the American people who reject involvement in our coming war.

No, fear not dear Franklin, the patriotism of this American dream to sail across the seas to punish OUR enemies, is in the good and trustworthy hands of Judah!

Bernard Baruch – the unofficial President of America.
Judge Samuel Roseman – the Founder and Head of the ‘Brains-Trust’ – Roosevelts “Advisors”
Professor Raymond Moley – Favorite Advisor.
Rabbi Stephan Wise (Weiz) – President of the WJC and Roosevelts closest Advisor/Firm Hand – see here: The Jewish Plan for WWII and all the Benefits it would Bring World Jewry
Henry Morgenthau Sr. – Unofficial Advisor, Jewish State Lawyer.
Theodore N. Kaufman – President of the ‘American Federation of Peace’ / Author of ‘Germany Must Perish’, precursor to the Morgenthau Plan – see here: Germany Must Perish
Harry Dexter White (Weit) – Senior U.S. Treasury department official (Transport of U.S. printing plates to Bolsheviks – see here: WWII: Espionage and the US funding of the Conquering Communists of Europe
Felix Frankfurter – Supreme Court Justice
Justice Benjamin Cardozo – Advisor.
Gerald Shwope – Advisor.
E. A. Filene – Advisor.
Charles Taussig – Brains-Trust Advisor.
Nathan Margold – Interior Department Solicitor.
Charles Wyzanski Jr. – Labour Department Solicitor.
Professor Leo Wolman – Labour Strike Board.
Rose Schneiderman – Labour Advisory Board.
Isador Lubin Jr. – Labour Bureau Statistician.
Solomon Rosenblatt – Amusement Administrator.
E. A. Goldenweiser – Federal Research Director.
Jerome Frank – General Council.
Mordechai Ezekile – Economic Advisor (Co-author of A.A.A. Laws).
Herbert Feis – “The Brains of the State Department.”
Henry Morgenthau Jr. – Secretary of the Treasury.
David Lilienthal – TVA Director.
Sidney Hillman – Labour Advisory Board.
L. N. Landau – PWA General Solicitor.
A. Steinhard – Minister to Sweden.
Professor Albert E. Taussig – NRA Advisor.
Alexander Sachs – NRA Code Authority.
Maurice Karp – NRA Director of Personnel.
Robert Freshner – CC C Forest Army Head.
Robert Strauss – NRA Assistant Administrator.
Donald Richberg – NRA Advisor.
H. I. Strauss – Ambassador to France.
Ferdinand Pecora – “Special” Investigator.
Samuel Untermayer – Stock-Exchange Bill Advisor.
Professor James M. Landis – Federal Trade Commissioner…

Just to name a few of the “Trustworthy Men” of American interests.

fdrinauguration - Copy

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.


France and Britain intentionally had Poland destroyed – to initiate WWII and have Europe Conquered by Communists

Despite all of Poland’s bravado and war cries to antagonise and instigate hostilities with Germany (see here), Poland Officials understood very clearly that they had no chance against Germany alone.

The French Military Command had in fact promised the Polish Military Ministry on May 19, 1939, that in the event of military aggression against Poland by another European power, France would come to its defense “no later than fifteen days after mobilisation”. This promise was sealed in a Military treaty signed between Poland and France… the Kasprzycki-Gamelin Convention.
It was named after the Polish Minister of War Affairs, General Tadeusz Kasprzycki and the Commander of the French Army, Maurice Gamelin, who both signed it. HOWEVER, it was only a military (army-to-army, not state-to-state) convention, making it arbitrary Martial Law if utilised, which was not authorised by any political enactment at all, as it was dependent on signing and ratification of Political Convention, for it to hold any international power.
The Treaty only became ratified on September 4, 1939, a day AFTER ‘France Declared War on Germany’… thus, no authoritative treaty was in place at the time of the French Declaration of War, or when Germany crossed the new-Polish border. The September 4 ratification was an illegal retroactive insertion, in attempt to justify the French Declaration of War and ultimate invasion of Germany. France had not been subject to any threat or attack from Germany whatsoever and, had in fact mobilised its military on August 26 – therefore France was the aggressor state and Germany had all right under both international and military law, to launch a defensive attack against France.

The Polish-British Common Defense Pact also contained promises of military assistance in the event that either country was attacked by any other “European Country.” This built upon the previous agreement (March 1939) between the two countries (which included only third party and verbal assurances from non-ratified France), by specifically committing to military assistance in the event of an invasion...

As intended, when Germany crossed the new-Polish border to liberate the German people from the bestial Guerilla attacks, Poland was completely betrayed by its so-called democratic friends. Britain and France did in fact Declare War on Germany, on September 3, 1939… but did either come to assist their provocative war-bait, Poland? France invaded Germany in the west on September 7 – the so-called Saar Offensive  (whose mobilisation began on August 26 – 6 days before Germany entered new-Poland) – advancing 8km’s in before stopping at German resistance and after the farcical Saar Offensive purposely fizzled, an almost 9 month Mexican Stand-off pursued – the Phony War.
The significance in this is that Hitler had concentrated most of the German military forces in the east at the time and France, having one of the strongest armies in the world, went nowhere near Poland and for the second time since the 1919 Versailles Treaty, breached German borders and militarily occupied foreign territory, in defiance of the Treaty.

Given such inaction by both France and Britain in regards to Polish defense assistance – as promised by Poland’s diplomatic friends – Hitler was able to take complete control over eastern Poland to liberate the German minority in less than 3 weeks… and then after the Allies ignored further Peace Proposals by Hitler, the Wehrmacht was mobilised west and the following year pushed both British and French forces back to their prospective territories – signing an Armistice with France and even allowing the British 2 unhindered days to evacuate 330,000 soldiers of the their cornered army, across the Channel from Dunkirk to England.

“I asked Joe  Kennedy
(US Ambassador in London, father of future US President, John F. Kennedy) about his talks with Roosevelt and Chamberlain in 1938. He said it had been Chamberlain’s belief in 1939 that Great Britain had nothing in its hands to fight and therefore wouldn’t dare go to war against Hitler… Neither the French nor the English would have made Poland a motivation for war, if they hadn’t been continually spurred on by Washington… America and the World-Jewry have driven England to war.”

∼ US Defence Minister, James Forrestal, 27/12/1945 in his diary (The Forrestal Diaries, New York, 1951, S 121 ff)

With the Polish army dealing with Germany in the west, Stalin cleverly decides to break the Soviet-Polish Non Aggression Pact of 1932. Poland is stabbed in the back by more diplomatic friends as Soviet forces pour in from the east too. The advancing Red Bolsheviks occupy the East, take prisoners and carry out massacres… the most famous being the Katyn Forest Massacre of an estimated 15,000 – 22,000 Polish officers, dignitaries and other intellectuals… blamed on Germans, of course!
Seven innocent German men hung for this Jewish Bolshevik crime and another three were sentenced to twenty years in the Jewish Gulag death camp system, never to be seen again – yet another result of Nuremberg’s Show Trial of purported justice.
(see: Katyn Massacre – Committed by Jewish Communists or Germans?)


Poland appeals to Britain for help, citing the Poland-British Defense Pact signed only a few weeks earlier! The Polish ambassador in London contacts the British Foreign Office pursuing clause 1(b) of the agreement, which concerned an “aggression by a European power” on Poland, stating it should apply to the Jewish-Bolshevik invasion also. The UK Foreign Secretary, Lord Halifax, responded with hostility stating that it was “Britain’s decision whether to declare war on the Soviet Union!”

The British and French betrayal of Poland in 1939 was not only dishonest, it was military stupidity of truly monumental proportions on Poland’s behalf, as they had plenty of warning in their negotiations and nothing clarified leading up to the 1st of September, in fact the clarity lessened the more time that went past. From Poland’s perspective, more betrayals would follow… Contrary to their assurances to the Poles, Britain and France agreed to allow the Bolshevik Soviets to occupy and keep eastern Poland which was taken over by the Red Army invasion on September 17, 1939, a non-provocative invasion – in breach of the 1932 Pact. The only purported compensation that Poland would claim, would be the ethnic cleansing of all Germans from lands that had been historically German for over 1000 years, creating at the end of the war, one of, if not the biggest humanitarian catastrophe’s known to the world… or perhaps mostly unknown?

A crowning humiliation of the Poles was the refusal of their British “friends” to allow the Free Polish Army to march in the victory parade at the end of the war, for fear of offending the Jewish-Bolshevik puppet government in Lublin.

During World War II, Poland suffered through one of the worst Soviet occupations in history, as well as civil war, Polish Nationalists fighting for sovereignty, Communist Partisans fighting against the Nationalists and the Germans, the Ghetto wars mixed with both, the NKVD liquidating ethnic Polish leaders by the thousands and many elements trying to reclaim the stolen German land again. After the war it had to suffer 45 years as a colony of the Communist Soviet Union as a result of the agreement signed by its friends, Britain and also America.


Great Britain and Poland

British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain stated in the House of Commons on March 31, 1939.

“As the House is aware, certain consultations are now proceeding with other Governments. In order to make perfectly clear the position of His Majesty’s Government in the meantime before those consultations are concluded, I now have to inform the House that during that period, in the event of any action which clearly threatened Polish independence, and which the Polish Government accordingly considered it vital to resist with their national forces, His Majesty’s Government would feel themselves bound at once to lend the Polish Government all support in their power.  They have given the Polish Government an assurance to this effect. I may add that the French Government have authorized me to make it plain that they stand in the same position in this matter as do His Majesty’s Government.”

Having seemingly secured a guarantee, the Poles now took steps toward coordinating their defensive preparations with the British. On April 4, 1939, Poland’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Józef Beck, visited London for talks with Prime Minister Chamberlain and Lord Halifax, the Foreign Secretary. The content of these talks was described in an official communiqué sent from London to Warsaw on April 6th:

“The conversations with M. Beck have covered a wide field and shown that the two Governments are in complete agreement upon certain general principles.  It was agreed that the two countries were prepared to enter into an agreement of a permanent and reciprocal character to replace the present temporary and unilateral assurance given by His Majesty’s Government to the Polish Government. Pending the completion of the permanent agreement, M. Beck gave His Majesty’s Government an assurance that the Polish Government would consider themselves under an obligation to render assistance to His Majesty’s Government under the same conditions as those contained in the temporary assurance already given by His Majesty’s Government to Poland.”

Shortly thereafter, a formal agreement between Poland and Britain was signed which clearly stated “If Germany attacks Poland His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom will at once come to the help of Poland.” This guarantee was also extended to Greece and Romania on April 13, 1939.


“In April, 1939 (four months before the outbreak of war), Ambassador William C, Bullitt, whom I had known for twenty years, called me to the American Embassy in Paris. The American Ambassador told me that war had been decided upon. He did not say, nor did I ask, by whom. He let me infer it… When I said that in the end Germany would be driven into the arms of Soviet Russia and Bolshevism, the Ambassador replied: “What of it? There will not be enough Germans left when the war is over worth Bolshevising.”

Karl Von Wiegand, April 23rd, 1944, Chicago Herald American.

France and Poland

Whereas Britain’s supposed support of Poland was a relatively recent diplomatic development, Poland’s alliance with the French had a longer history. The first French efforts to buttress Poland against Germany went back to 1921, after dissecting German territory to Poland from the Versailles annexation in 1919. In that year, Raymond Poincaré, soon to become president of the French Republic, had stated “Everything orders us to support Poland: The [Versailles] Treaty, the plebiscite, loyalty, the present and the future interest of France, and the permanence of peace.” (See: Versailles: The Peace to End All Peace – Pt 4)

Eighteen years later and after Germany was rising from the depths of economic, geographic and the political oppression of Versailles – along with the worst hyperinflation ever imposed on a nation – the political agitators felt the time was ripe to begin putting their strategies in place. France apparently decided to build upon the vague defensive alliance it had formed with Poland in the wake of World War I. In mid-May of 1939, Poland’s Minister of War, General Tadeusz Kasprzycki, visited Paris for a series of talks. At issue for Kasprzycki, was clarifying the terms under which France would actually assist Poland militarily. These talks resulted in the Franco-Polish Military Convention which, according to historian Richard Watt, stated that “on the outbreak of war between Germany and Poland, the French would immediately undertake action against Germany, which would involve a major military offensive of the full French army to take place no later than fifteen days after mobilization.” However, as we have already ascertained above, this was never ratified before the French mobilisation, or the September 4 Declaration of War.

Polish historian Paweł Wieczorkiewicz interpreted that: “Polish leaders were not aware of the fact that England and France were not ready for war. They needed time to catch up with the Third Reich, and were determined to gain the time at any price.”
Publicist Stanisław Mackiewicz stated in the late 1940s: “To accept London’s guarantees was one of the most tragic dates in the history of Poland. It was a mental aberration and madness”.
On the same day when Britain pledged her support of Poland, Lord Halifax stated: “We do not think this guarantee will be binding.”
Another British diplomat, Alexander Cadogan wrote in his diary: “Naturally, our guarantee does not give any help to Poland. It can be said that it was cruel to Poland, even cynical.”

Polish-British military negotiations carried out in London, ended up in a fiasco. After lengthy talks, the British reluctantly pledged to bomb German military installations if the Germans carried out the same in Poland. Polish military leaders failed to obtain any more promises. At the same time, the Polish side tried again to negotiatie a military loan. Polish ambassador to Britain, Edward Raczyński, called these negotiations “a never-ending nightmare.”
Józef Beck in his memoirs wrote: “The negotiations, carried out in London by Colonel Adam Koc, immediately turned into theoretical discussion about our financial system. It was clear that Sir John Simon and Frederick Leith-Ross did not realize the gravity of the situation. They negotiated in purely financial terms, without consideration for the rules of the wartime alliance. As a result, the English offer gave us no grounds for quick reinforcement of our army.”

Finally, on August 2, 1939, almost 5 months after the initial assurances, Britain eventually agreed to grant Poland a military loan of £9 million, which was less than Turkey received at the same time. Poland had asked for a loan of £60 million back in May, when there was still a timely manner for preparations.


Polish Expectations, British and French Promises

Understandably, throughout the spring and summer of 1939, officials in Warsaw drew much gusto from the numerous assurances made by France and Great Britain, that Poland would not stand alone against Germany. For its part, the Polish military was under no illusion that it could not defend against a German assault for any more than a few weeks.  Although Poland could field one of the largest armies on the European continent, its troops were only lightly armed in comparison to their German counterparts. In terms of modern weaponry, Poland was also severely lacking in armored vehicles and tanks, and its air force was hopelessly outmatched by the German Luftwaffe.
Strategically speaking, Polish Generals envisioned fighting the Germans at the frontier and then slowly retreating toward the south-eastern corner of the country, where an escape route into neighboring Rumania existed. The Poles thus fully expected the Germans to advance deeply into their country, but the western region of historically German land inhabited by German people, was the only interest to Germany initially. The sole hope of the Polish forces was that they could hold on long enough for French troops and British air power to attack Germany, along with a western border offensive to draw off enough German divisions, to allow a Polish counterattack. After all, France had promised in May to launch an all-out major offensive within two weeks of any German military activity.

french-liesUltimately, the half-hearted Saar Offensive by the French, which mobilised on August 26 and invaded September 7, was halted after France occupied the Warndt Forest, 7.8 km2 of extensively-mined German territory. The French army failed to reach the Siegfried line.
The attack did not result in any diversion of German troops. The assured 40-division all-out assault never materialised. By the 12th of September, the Anglo French Supreme War Council gathered for the first time at Abbeville, in France. It was decided that all offensive actions were to be halted immediately! General Maurice Gamelin ordered his troops to stop “not closer than 1 kilometre” from the German positions along the Siegfried Line and of course, Poland was not notified of this decision. Instead, Gamelin informed the Polish Marshal Edward Rydz-Śmigły, that half of his divisions were engaging the German western divisions, and that the French advances had forced the Wehrmacht to withdraw at least six divisions from Poland… this was not true.

The following day, the commander of the French Military Mission to Poland, General Louis Faury, informed the Polish chief of staff, General Wacław Stachiewicz, that the planned major offensive on the western front had to be postponed from September 17 to 20. No clear reason was given at the time for this postponement, but it was, coincidently, the very same day the the Bolshevik Red Army invaded Poland from the east.

Expectations of swift Allied action were also repeatedly reinforced by the British. For example, during Anglo-Polish General Staff talks held in Warsaw at the end of May, the Poles stressed the need for British aerial assaults on Germany should Poland provoke war. The British responded with assurances that the Royal Air Force would attack industrial, civilian and military targets. General Sir Edmund Ironside then repeated this promise during an official visit to Warsaw in July. The Poles were reassured that Britain would carry out bombing raids on Germany once hostilities began.

The Reality: English and French Duplicity

At the same time that Allied politicians and military officers were promising to help Poland fight a war against Germany, events going on behind the scenes revealed that the British and French seriously doubted their ability to effectively aid the Poles and moreso, their intended reluctance of acting on their lip-service. Take for example discussions held by the British and French Chiefs of Staff between March 31 and April 4, 1939. A report issued at the conclusion of these talks entitled ‘The Military Implications of an Anglo-French Guarantee of Poland and Rumania’ stated:

“If Germany undertook a major offensive in the East there is little doubt that she could occupy Rumania, Polish Silesia and the Polish Corridor. If she were to continue the offensive against Poland, it would only be a matter of time before Poland was eliminated from the war. Though lack of adequate communications and difficult country would reduce the chances of an early decision. … No spectacular success against the Siegfried Line can be anticipated, but having regard to the internal situation in Germany, the dispersal of her effort and the strain of her rearmament programme, we should be able to reduce the period of Germany’s resistance and we could regard the ultimate issue with confidence.”

In short, while the Western Allies as a collective, planned on the eventual destruction of Germany and admit Germany would be fighting in ‘Resistance’ against the Allies in the west (aka – Defense), they also believed that Germany would crush Poland before turning her forces to the Allies western assault… in other words, they wanted a public excuse for a prolonged international war and, Poland would be the bait to produce it and to weaken the German defenses.

This situation of intended reluctance did not change substantially in the months leading up with the increasing provocations for hostilities, despite considerable information that western intelligence received concerning German military activity. Robert Coulondre, the French ambassador to Germany, sent a telegram to Paris regarding German troop movements. For example, on July 13, 1939, Coulondre wrote Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Minister, that “This Embassy has recently reported to the Ministry numerous signs of abnormal activity in the German army and of Germany’s obvious preparations for the possibility of an impending war.”

Given what we now know about the months leading up to World War II, one cannot help but agree with the conclusion of Polish scholar, Anita Prazmowska:

“After granting the guarantee to defend Poland, the British (one might add the French — WFF) failed to develop a concept of an eastern front. The result was that the guarantee to Poland remained a political bluff devoid of any strategic consequence.”


By August 1939, with the attacks on the German minority in the stolen territory increasing, along with German refugees flooding out of Poland across the border and the Allies knowing all too well, that Hitler had exhausted almost all diplomatic avenues to resolve the issue (even though he was still attempting to negotiate in these final days, while Poland mobilised), as they had purposely ignored all his previous sincere attempts to resolve it peacefully; Allied preparations for war remained minimal at best. Britain, in particular, appeared to be paralysed by an inability to prepare for anything. Not surprisingly, the British had developed no coherent plan for offensive operations in the west, either in the air or on the ground. Add to that, they also refused requests from Paris to devote any air power to support the allegedly anticipated French all-out offensive into Germany’s west. And as far as aerial attacks on Germany were concerned, British military planners had actually retreated from their earlier promise to the Poles. By the end of August, thus on the very eve of Polish mobilisation and Germany crossing the border, the Chiefs of Staff in London had decided not to attack a wide array of targets in Germany. Rather they would limit aerial bombardment to “military installations and units which were clearly that, to the exclusion of industrial stores and military industrial capacity.” Of course, the Poles were not informed of this alteration in Britain’s approach to strategic bombing either.

Still, the Western Allies continued to put on the charade of their diplomatic efforts. Considering the relative lack of military preparations, these efforts were nothing but farcical. For example, on August 15, Robert Coulondre cabled Paris concerning a meeting he’d had with Ernst von Weizsäcker, the State Secretary in the Foreign Ministry in Berlin.  During this one-hour conversation Coulondre told von Weizsäcker, “if any of the three Allies, France, England, and Poland, were attacked, the other two would automatically be at her side.” Furthermore, Coulondre then told Paris, “To guard as far as possible against this danger which appears to me formidable and imminent, I consider it essential:

(1) To maintain absolute firmness, an entire and unbroken unity of front, as any weakening, or even any semblance of yielding will open the way to war; and to insist every time the opportunity occurs on the automatic operation of military assistance.

(2) To maintain the military forces of the Allies, and in particular our own, on an equality with those of Germany, which are being continuously increased. It is essential that we should at the very least retain the previously existing ratio between our forces and those of the Reich, that we should not give the erroneous impression that we are ‘giving ground’.”

Again, Coulondre’s call for proper military preparations by France were in vain. Historian Anna Cienciala writes that General Maurice Gamelin, the commander of the French army, “had no intention to implement the French commitments made in the Military Convention [signed in May 1939].”
Even though Anna is correct in her analysis, Gamelin, instead, actually took steps to ensure that the Poles would in fact proceed to fight Germany, while not further committing French troops to action. In late August, Gamelin sent General Louis Faury to Warsaw as the head of the French Military Mission there. Prior to departing, Faury “was told that no date could be given [to the Poles] for a French offensive, that the French Army was in no state to attack, and that Poland would have to hold out as best she could.  His mission was to see that the Poles would fight.” … as General Ironside had commented in July, “the French have lied to the Poles in saying they are going to attack. There is no idea of it.”

The British too, had no thought of attacking Germany, although they would continue the political charade that they would. The Royal Air Force (RAF) would not be deployed against German units in support of a French offensive and aerial bombardment in Germany would be limited only to clearly marked military installations (an unworkable proposition, both then and now, even with advanced technology). Yet London continued to issue its own false assurances to Warsaw by signing a formal Agreement of Mutual Assistance between the United Kingdom and Poland, on August 25, 1939, that committed Britain to, ‘Declare War on Germany’ should she invade Poland… coincidentally again, the very same day, the ‘Kings Speech’ was drafted to declare war, supposedly spoken in light of a German surprise invasion (which had not occurred at that time the speech was drafted)… A Declaration, which of course is just a formal verbal activity, not physical military activity.
Still, even if any of the promises and assurances by France or Britain were followed through with, none of them were to help the Poles in Poland!

Finally, in the latter days of August, London and Paris advised Warsaw to only partially mobilise her armed forces, as it was suggested that a lesser force would provoke the Germans less? Reportedly, the Polish Officials did as they were asked in regard to the military mobilisation, however the apparently less provocative Guerilla attacks on the German minority not only continued, but increased! Consequently, when the German advancement came, this made it much easier for the Wehrmacht to split Polish defenses and drive deep behind Polish lines.


From the evidence presented here, it is clear that neither France, nor Great Britain, had the slightest intention of actually coming to the assistance of their Polish war-bait puppet… and worse still, were encouraging Poland to not only provoke Germany, but to fight alone against an army it had no chance of defeating – some might explain it as, being thrown under the bus. Thus, by September 1, 1939, all the political and propaganda pieces were in place for the beginning of a general European war. It would be a war for which Great Britain and France were egregiously unprepared for, but knew in the future their powerful network within the Soviet Union and United States, would utilise their forces to bring the melee to its apex, both militarily and financially.

However, France and Great Britain did indeed honor one of their signatures and both ‘Declared War on Germany’ September 3, 1939. Nevertheless, this of course proved to be a hollow declaration that provided absolutely no help to Poland. It was only to serve as an international psychological precursor, to evoke the nations from around the world to send millions of their sons to unknown graves in Europe, so the continent could be handed to Communism on a red platter, soaked in blood.

What transpired is by now well known. The RAF did not even attempt to bomb German military installations because, as the Air Staff concluded on September 20:

“Since the immutable aim of the Allies is the ultimate defeat of Germany, without which the fate of Poland is permanently sealed, it would obviously be militarily unsound and to the disadvantage of all, including Poland, to undertake at any given moment operations … unlikely to achieve effective results, merely for the sake of maintaining a gesture.”

The Chiefs of Staff agreed, informing 10 Downing Street that “nothing we can do in the air in the Western Theatre would have any effect of relieving pressure on Poland.” And so the RAF decided instead to drop propaganda leaflets, to stir up excitement for a world war.

If Hitler and the coined ‘German War Machine’ were in fact on a quest for World Domination – as peddled by the fear provoking propaganda disseminated in these early days, or even as early as March and April 1939, as the many Officials discussed and alluded to the public – then the opportunity to prepare for and, to fight a brief, localised war against the German Army, to defeat it before its rearmament expanded any further, was therefore lost in September 1939… and the world has since been led to believe that the international network of Allied Military Strategists, as a collective, had not even discussed or contemplated this approach and simply overlooked the opportunity, especially when the interests of world security and peace was supposedly at stake?
By the same token, if the German World Domination agenda were true, they would have taken out France and Great Britain before giving them time for armament expansion during the Phoney War period, instead of later defensive actions against the Allies, ultimately signing an Armistace with France and giving the entire British Army safe travel home from Dunkirk.
Of course, what was actually lost, was millions of lives, which the noble Officials had poetically seduced the ears and hearts of the worlds peoples, as the very oxymoronic reason a world war must be fought for in the first place… Instead, what became was the intentional conditions to enable a communist take-over of Europe, which led to decades of Soviet occupation and the Cold War – hostile to the west – with the help OF the west.

As many Officials seemingly believed the German World Domination narrative, General Ironside commented in 1945, after much of Europe was in ruins, “Militarily we should have gone all out against the German the minute he invaded Poland. … We did not … And so we missed the strategical advantage of the Germans being engaged in the East. We thought completely defensively and of ourselves.”


“Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all of Europe will be Communist. It’s said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Red Army) had I been allowed.”

∼ General George Patton, July 21, 1945, The Patton Papers (a letter to his wife)

A brief and abrupt assault on a military threat before they build up arms, would be the strategy of any genuine Military tactic, in order to defeat a genuine threat… as any trained and experienced Military Commander would know. General George Patton was one such experienced Veteran, who sought to do just that in 1945 while the U.S. military was still unchallengeable. He ultimately saw the truth to the reasons for the war, what was unfolding in Europe and especially Berlin… that the Communists were taking over and he sought the permission to take Berlin and the Red army while there was still the chance – the permission never came. Instead, he was ordered to hold the U.S. Army back and wait to allow the ‘Gallant Red Army’ to occupy German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian and Yugoslavian territories.

“I understand the situation. Their (the Red Army) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in any serious action such as I can put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof – that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then… we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!”
∼ General George Patton, May 7, 1945.


The reasons for the various parties involvement in military hostilities, are wide and varied pertaining to their individual locations, pressures, impositions and manipulations. But when viewing any military action, Defense can look a lot like Attack, depending on who’s telling the story.
For Germany’s part, World Domination would have to be the most inane ‘Hollywood’ of excuses to incite people to travel to other lands to kill strangers. Germany fought in defense of heritage, home and its people. Initially for those Germans being terrorised in stolen land and ultimately in defense of all Europe, against the Conquering Communists who slaughtered millions of Europeans in the most callous and sadistic ways.

Finally, knowing that the powerful financiers of International-Jewry had their political network so stringently placed in Washington, London, Moscow and Paris, being the predominant ‘Advisors’ and ‘Think Tanks’ for the representatives of political decisions… why would they not ‘Advise’ against the total annihilation of the one nation state (besides Jewish-Bolshevik Russia) who had the largest Jewish population in Europe? Unless of course the suffering and persecution served an ulterior purpose? The answer to this can be found here

In the commentary on the Anglo-Polish Alliance, Polish publicist Stanisław Mackiewicz wrote in his 1964 book, Polityka Becka:

“England does not need the existence of Poland, it has never needed it. Sometimes the British push us to fight against Russia, sometimes against Germany, as happened in 1939, when they managed to keep Hitler away from them for some time. After their so-called guarantees of March 1939, England was not interested in our army, it did not help us financially in our war preparations, and did not have the slightest intention to aid us during Hitler’s invasion of Poland (…) The guarantee of Poland’s independence, provided by England, was not a guarantee at all. On the contrary, it was a speculation, whose purpose was the fastest possible liquidation of the Polish state. England wanted Poland to fight Germany first, and to lose that war as quickly as possible, so that Germany would finally face Russia.”


Let us give Adolf Hitler the final say

Excerpt from his July 19, 1940 speech in the Reichstag:

“…Men of letters set out to portray decent men who desired peace as weaklings and traitors, to denounce opposition parties as a “fifth column,” in order to eliminate internal resistance to their criminal policy of war. Jews and Freemasons, armament industrialists and war profiteers, international traders and stockjobbers, found political blackguards: desperados and glory seekers who represented war as something to be yearned for and hence wished for.

It is to be ascribed to these criminal elements, that the Polish State was incited to assume a posture which stood in no relation to the German demands and even less to the consequences that resulted.

The German Reich, in particular with regard to Poland, has shown restraint ever since the National Socialist rise to power. One of the basest and stupidest provisions of the Versailles Diktat, namely the tearing away of an old German province from the Reich, already cried for a revision in and of itself.

But what was it that I demanded at the time? I must in this context refer to my own person. No other statesman could have afforded to propose a solution to the German nation in the way I did. It comprised merely the return of Danzig – that is to say of an ancient, purely German city  -to the Reich as well as the creation of a connection of the Reich to its severed province. And this only pursuant to plebiscites conducted, in turn, under the auspices of an international forum. If Mr. Churchill or any other warmongers had but a fraction of the sense of responsibility I felt toward Europe, they could not have played so perfidious a game. For it need be ascribed solely to these vested interests in war, both within Europe and beyond, that Poland rejected the proposals, which neither compromised its existence nor its honor, and instead resorted to terror and arms. And it was truly superhuman restraint, without precedent, which for months led us, in spite of persistent assassination attempts on ethnic Germans – yes, indeed, in spite of the slaughter of tens of thousands of German Volksgenossen, to continue to search for a path toward peaceful understanding. For what was the situation like? One of the creations of the Diktat of Versailles, the most divorced from reality, a bogy, inflated militarily and politically, insulted a state for many months, threatening to beat it, to fight battles before Berlin, to smash the German Army to pieces, to transfer the border to the Oder or the Elbe; it went on and on. And this other state, Germany, watches the goingson patiently for months, although one sweeping gesture would have sufficed to wipe this bubble – inflated by stupidity and arrogance – off the face of the earth.

[Again] On September 2, this struggle could yet have been avoided. Mussolini made a proposal to put an immediate end to the hostilities and to negotiate peacefully. Though Germany saw its armies advancing victoriously, I accepted this nonetheless. But the Anglo-French warmongers needed war, not peace.

And they needed a long war, as Mr. Chamberlain put the matter at the time. It was to last for at least three years, since they had in the meantime invested their capital in the armament industry, bought the necessary machinery, and now needed the precondition of time for the thriving of their business and for the amortization of their investments. And besides: what are Poles, Czechs, or other such nationalities to these citizens of the world?….”

Full speech here

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

After 20 Years of Versailles and Economic Oppression – Who Really Wanted an International War?

WARNING! The following contains graphic imagery – parental discretion advised

Hitler attempts to resolve the unrest within Danzig and the stolen ‘Polish Corridor

The 1939 August 28 headline of the New York Times, confirmed that Hitler sought to avoid war, it read; “BERLIN THINKS DOOR IS LEFT OPEN TO PEACEFUL SOLUTION”
Hitler’s supposed ludicrous suggestion to resolve the issue, was to hold a Referendum, for the people to decide their own status.

Berlin seeks peace

Danzig was formerly part of Germany before the so-called ‘Peace Treaty’ of Versailles annexed it to Polands’ ownership as a purported ‘Free City’ under the League of Nations.
Along with its surrounding German area of East Prussia, Danzig was also isolated from the German mainland by the harsh post-World War I Treaty. The new territory that now belonged to Poland, cut right through the Prussian/Pomeranian region of Germany, to the Baltic Sea. Over night, through no choice of their own, millions of Germans were converted to a disarmed ethnic minority in the new-Poland, at the behest of several political ‘Diplomats’ in an obscure Train-Car far away in France.

Danzig Polish Corridor

Hitler proposes that the people living in Danzig and the “Corridor” be permitted to vote in a referendum to decide whether they would return to being German citizens again, or remain a disarmed German minority forced to be part of Poland, where they had been continually attacked since the 1919 ‘Peace Treaty’ – that is, those who had not been expelled from their homes that same year.
Hitler proposed, that if the region was returned to German sovereignty, Poland would be given a 1 mile wide access path to the Baltic Sea, so that it would not be landlocked.

Referendum for Danzig

Poland apparently considered Hitler’s solution, however, with the ongoing political manipulations, Poland is urged by Franklin.D Roosevelt to not make any deals with Germany. Germans stranded in the stolen ‘corridor’ and the “free city” of Danzig were abused and denied their right of self-determination. There, they were continually being subjected to beatings, imprisonment (for as little as speaking German) and bestial attacks by Jewish Partisans, Polish Officers and Bolshevik NKVD Operatives.

August 23, 1939, one full week before Germany crosses the border, German refugees from the annexed German territory of new-Poland, tell of their personal experiences after escaping to safety in the camps on the German side of the border. It was reported in this German weekly news-reel (original in German with English subtitles).

When it became apparent to Hitler that Poland would not permit a referendum for the people, he then proposes another solution… International control of the former German regions.
This sensible offer was also ignored and the internationalists continued to use foolish Poland as the provocative bait to ignite an international bloodbath, now known as World War II… or what the profiteers like to call, “The Good War.”

August 25, 1939, Britain and Poland agree to a Military Alliance

The ‘Polish-British Common Defense Pact’ contained promises of military assistance in the event that either country was attacked by any other “European Country.” This built upon a previous agreement (March 1939) between the two countries and also France, by specifically committing to military assistance in the event of an invasion… although the French commitment was never ratified prior to the regional conflict, only AFTER ‘France Declared War on Germany’ (a retroactive enactment), making France the aggressor state when it invaded Germany. (see here)

With this agreement in place, the powerful Zionist-Internationalist forces within the UK, had now trapped the reluctant Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, as well as the willing (and illegal) France and Poland into military action, or at least international ‘Declarations of War’. All that was left to do was for Polish-Jewish border Guerilla’s to continue deliberately provoking Germany into action to get the ball rolling… However, assisting Poland was never their intention. (see here)

Also on that same day, August 25 1939, a draft is written for a reactionary ‘Declaration of War’ for HRH King George VI to address the world.

On the 3rd of September 1939, King George VI read the famous ‘Kings Speech’ addressing the British nation and the world. The speech that began with, “In this grave hour, perhaps the most fateful in our history …” was to inform the world that Germany had allegedly invaded a sovereign nation, that the world was at war due to this military attack and the Allies of the world should unite steadfastly against this purportedly – Surprise Aggression – of a common enemy to all peaceful peoples… However, the draft of this speech is dated the 25th of August, 1939 – a week before Germany entered the Corridor to liberate the German people and 9 days before the King delivered the speech. This indicates that Britain had plans to ‘Declare War on Germany’ before the Wehrmacht entered new-Poland to liberate the German people… thus, Britain’s ‘Declaration’ was not a reactionary response to a surprise invasion. Further, the typed document, which was actually the second draft of the speech, was retained by civil servant Harold Vale Rhodes, who had previously written a first attempt (date unknown). In a penciled note in the left-hand margin, Mr Rhodes criticised the length of some of the sentences in the second draft and hinted that his should be used.
It would appear his advice was followed – the final speech read to the nation by the King on September 3 contained shorter, more concise sentences.
The early draft accused Germany of being a bully who wanted to dominate the world by brute force and stressed that, we are fighting for the principles of freedom and justice“Brute Force of a Bully” – if it could be considered such – had not even occurred at the time the speech was drafted.

First Page

HRH King George VI delivers the final draft of the speech


One of the tens of  thousands of Ethnic German victims of Jewish Partisan attacks
The “Brute Force of Bullies” the Empire turned a blind eye to.

August 30, 1939 – Poland Mobilises

Poland mobilises her army strategically for the German frontier. According to International Law, any mobilisation of a country’s army, is equal to a ‘Declaration of War’ on a neighboring country especially without consultation. The Official Declaration came midnight that same date. [See: the German White Book]

August 31, 1939. The Gleiwitz (and other) Border Attacks – Jewish-Polish Guerilla’s attack German Radio Station

Underestimating German strength, but naively believing that France and the UK would now be forced to back them, Polish-Jewish terrorists cross the border and attack a German radio station in Silesia, Germany. It was only the latest in a string of deliberate border instigations against Germany.

The “Poles” then broadcast a message (in Polish) urging others to take up arms and start attacking Germans. German police quickly arrived and retake the station, killing one of the Red terrorists. Jewish Red terrorists, their Polish government protectors and their Globalist-Zionist masters, have picked a fight with Germany!

Modern ‘Court Historians’ claim that the Gleiwitz incident was staged by Germans dressed as Polish terrorists. A theory that ignores the outrageous and repeated pattern of provocations directed at Hitler’s Germany ever since 1933, the numerous border incidents, the attacks on the Volksdeutsche since 1919 and also Hitler’s repeated sincere attempts to negotiate a fair resolution to the Corridor and Danzig atrocities.

Witnesses who lived on the border attested to the repeated attacks by Polish Jews since 1919

A German Customs Official said it was so bad on the border, they were armed and also had grenades in their office ready for the frequent attacks.
Farmers confirm their live-stock were often stolen by Polish terrorists.
Another told of his niece being raped by a Polish Jew who crossed the border. He said they had caught the man and still held a copy of the death order signed by Heydrich, in which he ordered the man put to death.

These are only a very small few of many, many stories told by German civilians, who witnessed these border incursions just like had happened between 1919-1928.
One thing many people fail to recognise is that Poland openly attacked Germany right after World War I (during Germany’s Civil War, between alien Communist elements and German Nationals), which led to multiple border battles.

Once Hitler started pressing Poland to work out a solution to the corridor, the attacks increased again… And one thing that should be clear, is that Germany did not fabricate these attacks.

Several quotes of related importance:

Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to.”
∼ Polish Marshal Rydz-Smigly, as reported in the Daily Mail, August 6th, 1939.

“It will be the Polish army that will invade Germany on the first day of war.”
∼ Juliusz Łukasiewicz, Polish Ambassador in Paris, August 15,1939.

On September 2nd 1939 a delegate of the Labour Party met with the British Foreign Minister Halifax in the lobby of Parliament.
Do you still have hope?” he asked. “If you mean hope for war,” answered Halifax, “then your hope will be fulfilled tomorrow.” – “God be thanked!” replied the representative of the British Labour Party.
(Professor Michael Freund)

In April, 1939, (four months before the outbreak of war) Ambassador William C. Bullitt, whom I had known for twenty years, called me to the American Embassy in Paris. The American Ambassador told me that war had been decided upon. He did not say, nor did I ask, by whom. He let me infer it. … When I said that in the end Germany would be driven into the arms of Soviet Russia and Bolshevism, the Ambassador replied: “What of it? There will not be enough Germans left when the war is over to be worth Bolshevising.”
(Karl von Wiegand, April, 23rd, 1944, Chicago Herald American)

samuel-untermeyerI emphasized that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit.”
∼ Samuel Untermeyer, The Public Years, p.347.

Germany is too strong. We must destroy her.” ∼  Winston Churchill, Nov. 1936

The war was not just a matter of the elimination of Fascism in Germany, but rather of obtaining German sales markets.”
∼  Winston Churchill. March, 1946.

British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain told US Ambassador to Britain, Joseph P. Kennedy (father of future US President John F. Kennedy), that “it was America and world Jews who had forced Britain into war against Hitler.”

I asked Joe Kennedy (US Ambassador in London) about his talks with Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain in 1938. He said it had been Chamberlains belief in 1939 that Great Britain has nothing in its hands to fight and therefore wouldn’t dare to go to war against Hitler… Neither the French nor the English would have made Poland a motive for war if they hadn’t been continuously spurred on by Washington… America and the World-Jewry have driven England to war.”
~ US defence minister J. Forrestal 27.12.1945 in his diary (The Forrestal Diaries, New York, 1951, S. 121 ff)

When the National Socialists and their friends cry or whisper that this [the war] is brought about by Jews, they are perfectly right.
(The Jewish magazine ‘Sentinel of Chicago’, October 8, 1940)

chaim-weizmann“We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that ‘it is waged’ for Jewry… Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going. The guarantee of victory is predominantly based on weakening the enemy forces, on destroying them in their own country, within the resistance. And we are the Trojan horses in the enemy’s fortress.”

~ Chaim Weizmann, President of the World Jewish Congress, Head of the Jewish Agency and later, 1st President of Israel, in a Speech on December 3, 1942, in New York.

Britain was taking advantage of the situation to go to war against Germany because the Reich had become too strong and had upset the European balance.”
(Ralph F. Keeling, Institute of American Economics)

“The millions of Jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South, not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.”
~ ‘The Jewish newspaper, ‘Central Blad Voor Israeliten’ in Nederlands (13 September 1939)


In no country has the historical blackout been more intense and effective than in Great Britain. Here it has been ingeniously christened The Iron Curtain of Discreet Silence. Virtually nothing has been written to reveal the truth about British responsibility for the Second World War and its disastrous results.”
∼Harry Elmer Barnes. American Historian

The last thing Hitler wanted was to produce another great war.” ∼ Sir. Basil Liddell Hart

“Hitler doesn’t want war but he will be forced to it, and in fact soon. England has the final say like in 1914.”
~ Zionist Emil Ludwig Cohn, “Annalen”
“Although Hitler may want to prevent this war, which can devour him, in the last moment, he will be forced to war anyway.”
~ Emil Ludwig Cohn (1938)


“In this hour I feel it to be my duty before my own conscience to appeal once more to reason and common sense in Great Britain as much as elsewhere. I consider myself in a position to make this appeal, since I am not the vanquished, begging favors, but the victor speaking in the name of reason. I can see no reason why this war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices which it will claim. I would like to avert them

∼ Adolf Hitler, July, 1940 – ‘Last Appeal to Reason’

We entered the war of our own free will, without ourselves being directly assaulted.”
∼ Winston Churchill, Guild Hall Speech, July 1943.


I believe now that Hitler and the German people did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of balance of power, and we were encouraged by the ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler’s pleadings not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right.”
– Attorney General, Sir. Hartley Shawcross, March,16th, 1984

(Who were the so-called ‘Americans’ around Roosevelt? See here)

Hitler has to make a choice

Knowing that with the ‘British-Polish Common Defense Pact’ (built upon a previous agreement with France) in place; and that no one in any of the international institutions sought to do anything about the atrocities continually committed against ethnic Germans in the Corridor and, he had exhausted all other diplomatic avenues, that any German mobilisation in the corridor, would be technically subject to aggression from Britain and France – although not necessary and definitely not legally where France was concerned.

The increasing attacks on Germans in new-Poland, saw large waves of refugees flocking across the border to escape. Trains were being loaded to full capacity day and night, while others loaded what they could onto carts and walked… however, the attacks continued –  some made it, some did not.
If Hitler mobilised the Wehrmacht (German Army), the attacks might increase, with the possibility of a British-French aggression as well… but if he did nothing, the attacks would continue until the potential toward ultimate extinction of the German minority within the Corridor, would result… The barbarous massacres had to be stopped!

His intended approach was to make the rescue of the German minority hard and brief, to have the problem over within the shortest time frame possible, in attempt to avoid any prolonged hostilities.

Hitler has taken all he could from Poland against the Volksdeutsche in the ‘Corridor’ and German Forces advance eastward

September 1st, the Polish Army, Red Terrorist Partisans and NKVD retreat from the German-New Poland border.

September 3rd, the attacks against Germans in Poland continue. Over national radio it was repeatedly announced, “Carry out order no. 55 – Carry out order no. 55” (in Polish).
In the town of Bromberg on one day alone, 5,500 German Men, Women and Children were hunted down the streets, in their homes and were shot, tortured, beaten, raped, women had their breasts cut off, men were castrated, eviscerated, crucified, bludgeoned, hacked, mutilated and those who could not flee, were scorched in their burning homes… or both.

September 3rd, the world press shrieks in horror over German aggression; and Britain together with France [officially] ‘Declare War on Germany’… the massacre of ethnic Germans was conveniently ignored.

We will not forget them – “Never Forget” – May they be at peace


Psalm 137:9
“Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the rocks”

Castrated Bromberg

The castration of uncircumcised men, was common practice
by Jewish Terrorists right across Europe, especially in
Jewish Bolshevik Russia and in their Gulag Death Camps



Three of the Jewish Partisan Terrorists, who were Sentenced for the Bestial Slaughter
against the innocent Danzig German Minority, within the stolen new-Polish Corridor

 Jewish Partisan neighbours were all over Europe, who did not take prisoners
or spare civilians. Many of these Jewish Bolshevik Militia’s were killed in battle
or summarily executed after capture, not because they were Jewish, but because
they were savage and murderous, non-uniformed, combatant, Red Guerilla Terrorists.
These summary executions were legal and warranted within the articles of the
Geneva Conventions’ Laws of War
which Germany was signatory to.

Hitler speaks of the atrocities committed against Germans in the annexed territory

September 17, 1939 – The Jewish Soviets invade Poland from the East… Allies and Western Media remain silent

With the Polish army being routed by the advancing Germans in the west, Stalin cleverly decides to break the Soviet-Polish Non Aggression Pact of 1932. Poland is stabbed in the back as Soviet forces pour in from the east. The advancing Red Bolsheviks, occupy the East, take prisoners and carry out massacres… the most famous being the Katyn Forest Massacre of an estimated 15,000 – 22,000 Polish officers, dignitaries and other intellectuals… blamed on Germans, of course.
Seven German men hung for this Jewish Bolshevik crime and another three were sentenced to twenty years in the Jewish Gulag death camp system, never to be seen again – yet another result of Nuremberg’s Show Trial of purported justice.

One of the mass graves of Ethnic Poles found in the
Katyn Forrest, committed by Jewish Bolshevik NKVD

Other than the pre-Versailles German areas which Germany would reclaim, the Jewish Soviets took all of Poland. In a shocking double-standard, the anti-German Jewish press, FDR, France & the UK remain, not surprisingly, silent about this brutal Soviet aggression against Poland, despite the military assistance Britain and France had assured Poland of, in the event of an invasion by a European Country.

Poland appeals to Britain for help, citing the Poland-British Defense Pact signed only a few weeks earlier! The Polish ambassador in London contacts the British Foreign Office pursuing clause 1(b) of the agreement, which concerned an “aggression by a European power” on Poland, stating it should apply to the Soviet invasion also. The UK Foreign Secretary, Lord Halifax, responds with hostility stating that it was “Britain’s decision whether to declare war on the Soviet Union!”

It was apparent that the Allies did not care about Poland or to honour any contractual agreement. They only used its foolish ultra-nationalist leader to instigate Hitler, so that they could have their war to destroy Germany and ultimately, all of Europe. The horror that Poland would suffer under Soviet occupation was apparently Poland’s problem, not Britain’s.

September 19, 1939, Germany has defeated Poland – Germany and Western Prussia are reunited with Germany again

Within a few weeks, the German-Polish Regional Conflict is already over. Hitler receives a hero’s welcome upon his arrival in liberated Danzig. Hitler addresses the Danzig crowd;

“No power on earth would have borne this condition as long as Germany. I do not know what England would have said about a similar peace solution (Versailles) at its expense or how America or France would have accepted it?
I attempted to find a tolerable solution – even for this problem. I submitted this attempt to the Polish rulers in the form of verbal proposals… You know these proposals. They were more than moderate. I do not know what mental condition the Polish Government was in when it refused these proposals.
As an answer, Poland gave the order for the first mobilization. Thereupon wild terror was initiated, and my request to the Polish Foreign Minister to visit me in Berlin once more to discuss these questions was refused. Instead of going to Berlin, he went to London.”

danzig-greets-hitlerHitler is greeted with open arms in liberated Danzig

October 1939 – May 1940… Hitler pleads for peace with France and Britain

The German-Polish ‘Regional Conflict’ had ended quickly, in fact, within less than 3 weeks, as Hitler had hoped. There was nothing to which the All-lies could do to help their Polish puppet. The conflict was over, the German minority within the Corridor were liberated from the atrocities and no further action was sought by Germany – except for the offer to repair the various damage done to the region during the conflict. The French actually invaded Germany on September 7th, advancing 8 km before stopping (apparently the Defence Pact to protect Poland could be achieved by invading Germany, when the Wehrmacht were in new-Poland?), while the Bolsheviks had positioned themselves in the east. The quiet period between the end of the German-Polish regional conflict until May 1940, was dubbed by a US Senator as…
“The Phony War.”

During this time, Hitler pleads for the Allies to withdraw their war declarations. Towards France he declares:

“I have always expressed to France my desire to bury forever our ancient enmity and bring together these two nations, both of which have such glorious pasts.”

To the British, Hitler says:

“I have devoted no less effort to the achievement of Anglo-German friendship. At no time and in no place have I ever acted contrary to British interests….Why should this war in the West be fought?”

Hitler’s pleas for peace are ignored as the Glorious Allies amass 600,000 troops in Northern France. Plans are openly discussed to advance eastward upon Germany, via Belgium and Holland, as well as establishing operations in Norway and Denmark, with or without their consent… their “Declarations of Neutrality” meant nothing to the war mongers.

The British response to Hitlers olive branch, was mockery and ignorance to any thought of peace… While Hitler dropped Leaflets, Churchill dropped bombs.


 With all of Poland’s bravado and threatening war cries to instigate hostilities for an international blood-bath, where did that leave Poland?
In the end … Poland, for whose liberty the West had supposedly gone to war for, ended up with none at all. On the contrary, she was destroyed, with her Polish leaders slaughtered and the entire nation handed over to Stalin, along with the whole of Eastern Europe, including a part of Germany.
Even so, there are some people in the West who continue to believe that the West won the Second World War. Stalin and Jewish Bolshevism became the absolute conquerors of a vast empire hostile to the West, which had been created with the help OF the West. For all that, Stalin especially, was able to preserve his reputation as naive and trusting in helping the Western actions, while Hitler went down in history as the ultimate aggressor…
Nothing could be further from the truth!

Ridz Smigly

Excerpt from Hitler’s Danzig speech:

“…I do not intend to speak about the injustices of Versailles. Perhaps the worst thing in the lives of the nations is not so much the injustice, but the senselessness, the folly, and the utter stupidity with which in those days a peace was imposed upon the world, that completely disregarded all historical, economic, national and political facts. Regulations were arrived at which actually force one to doubt whether the men who perpetrated them were really in their right mind. Devoid of all knowledge of the historical development of these districts, devoid even of all economic understanding, these people juggled about with Europe, tore States apart, divided up countries, suppressed and handed over nations, destroyed culture.

This land, too, was a victim of that madness and the Polish State itself a product of this folly. What Germany had to sacrifice for this Polish State the world probably does not know. One thing only I should like to declare here: The development of all the territories which were at that time incorporated into Poland is entirely due to German energy, German industry, and German creative work. They owe their cultural importance exclusively to the German nation.

At that time the pretext for rending more than a whole province from the Reich and for allocating it to this new Polish State was that it was a matter of racial necessity. Actually the plebiscite held at a later date showed in every case that nobody really had any desire to be incorporated in this Polish State. This same Poland which owes its existence to the supreme sacrifice of countless German regiments, expanded, without regard for reason or economic considerations, at the expense of territory in which Germans had settled centuries ago…”

Hitler’s full Speech at Danzig

Hate and murder toward Germans had been taught to Poles for centuries

Katyn Forest Massacre – a “Who done it?” Jews or Germans? from the US National Archives.

‘Polish Atrocities Against the German Minority in Poland’ Published by Order of the Foreign Office, Berlin 1940 – Based on Documented Evidence – 299 pg Report (Warning: Graphic)

Further reading from Justice4Germans


Source and abridgement from excerpts of The Bad War – by M. S. King

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.