Book-Burning and All-lied Book Destruction Compared


For all the readily available information about the infamous ‘Nazi Book Burnings’, next to nothing is mentioned of a far greater book burning; that which transpired during the Allied Obliteration Bombing campaign upon Germany and the ‘Re-Education’ program of  any surviving Germans after their defeat and following occupation… which still continues to this day.

The so-called Book-Burning Policy of Germany

We have all heard about the so-called brainwashing German’s purported evil ‘Book Burning’, but there was never any official National Socialist policy to undertake such action. In fact, Chancellor Hitler did not learn of the May 1933 fire until after the first blaze, which was ignited by students.

The German Student Union did call for German university students to purge literature of Marxist influence and to RESTORE the aspects of German culture to their previous volkische traditions, before the degenerate Communist influence prevailed during the Weimar Republic.
The Theses included such detail as;

  • “Language and literature have their roots in the Folk. It is the German Folk’s responsibility to assure that its language and literature are the pure and unadulterated expression of its Folk traditions.
  • At present there is a chasm between literature and German tradition. This situation is a disgrace.
  • Purity of language and literature is your responsibility. Your Folk has entrusted you with the duty of faithfully preserving your language.
  • We want to eradicate lies, we want to denounce treason, we want institutions of discipline and political education for US THE STUDENTS, not MINDLESSNESS.
  • We demand of the German students the desire and capability for independent knowledge and decisions.
  • We demand of German students the desire and capability to overcome Jewish intellectualism and the resulting ‘liberal decay’ in the German spirit.”

With todays liberal societal mindset, which has resulted from the same Marxist incrementalism, this may be perceived as abhorrent and apparently ‘Racist.’ However, to understand the reasoning for such a call, one must understand what had evolved in Germany within the years from the Treaty of Versailles 1919, to 1933.

From the ‘Back-stabbing’ of Germany by International Jewry – the arbitrary annexation of German people, land and industry to surrounding states, the impossible WWI Reparations imposed on the German people and the purposeful hyperinflation – plunged Germany and her Volksdeutsche into incomprehensible poverty, suffering, starvation, death, immorality and desperation… all while a special few lived it up at their expense, in their homes and property, as they took new positions of power and influence of the newly imposed Republic (through the International Democratic overthrow of the former Autocratic Reich), taking over all business, finance and industry, with which they promoted promiscuity, pornography, bestiality, homosexuality, paedophilia, drugs and the sex trade, all through Jewish owned medical clinics, clubs, theatres and publications.
After years of deprivation, suffering and starvation, much of the German Volksdeutsche had succumbed to the Marxist demoralisation, through an environment of pure debauchery and the desperation of the ‘have-nots.’ Germany and, in particular, Berlin, had become the cesspit capital of Europe. To cleanse the German nation of such decadence as this, is what was evil, according to the Glorious All-lied Victors.

That all changed in 1933, when German property, business, finance, production, position, education, industry and publications were rightfully PUT BACK into indigenous Germans hands… for their own benefit.

[Note the Narrator states “Legend has it” regarding Goebbels’ alleged order to burn books]

All-lied deletion of German History, Culture and Traditional Spirit

DresdenIt is estimated that 11,075,000 [*] volumes and patents, which is over a third of all German books, had already been destroyed by the Allied barbarous aerial bombing in West Germany alone; and this does not include those in the areas taken from Germany after the war. Added to the millions of German books destroyed worldwide during the anti-German hysteria of WWI and the Jewish Boycott against Germany in 1933, far more German books were destroyed in the twentieth century, than exist today.
[*] (Source: UNESCO, General Information Programme and UNISIST, ‘Lost Memory – Libraries and Archives Destroyed in the Twentieth Century’)

Librorum ProhibitorumUntil the advent of the printing press, books were hand-scribed and existed in only one or a few copies. Burning them ensured that no one would ever read them… needless to say, thought control was simple pre-printing days.
However, citing rhetoric such as “Preventing corruption of the young” (ironically and hypocritically, a concept often cited in the German censorship laws today), the likes of Henry VIII required printers to submit all manuscripts to the Church for approval and imported publications were outlawed in 1529. French king Francis I, prohibited printing in 1535 and in 1559, the Catholic Church issued the Librorum Prohibitorum to order censors as to which publications to allow. Their approved index listed only 5,000 titles which existed right up until 1966.
Germany however, still had much of the hand-scribed books from its historical culture, but through the atrocious terror bombing of civilian cities by allied forces, they are lost forever;
But it didn’t stop there…

We might think those days were long behind a progressive society, but not under certain circumstances; and, ‘Re-education’ of Germans is and was one such circumstance.

The Allied consensus upon victory was the doctrine of collective guilt: all Germans, young or old, shared the blame for the war. The idea was entrenched enough that it caused no surprise when U.S. President, Harry S. Truman, refused to alleviate the famine of the German population in December, 1945, stating;

Starving German child

“Though all Germans might not be guilty for the war, it would be too difficult to try to single out for better treatment those who had nothing to do with the Nazi regime and its crimes.”
Apparently this even applied to babies and young children.

Morgenthau Plan

All German literature found in both the Soviet and Western Occupation Zones was subjected to censorship. In the U.S. zone, it was regulated by occupation directive JCS 1067 (The Morgenthau Plan) until July 1947, and in May 1946, the order was valid for all zones.

“Too many people here and in England hold the view that the German people as a whole are not responsible for what has taken place – that only a few Nazis are responsible. That unfortunately is not based on fact. The German people must have it driven home to them that the whole nation has been engaged in a lawless conspiracy against the decencies of modern civilization.”
~ President Franklin D. Roosevelt, August, 1944.

Allied Control Authority Order No. 4 stated:
“Confiscation of Literature and Material of a Nazi and Militarist Nature” dictated that all confiscated literature was reduced to pulp instead of burning – a psychological propaganda tactic, to avoid hypocritical accusations of ‘Book-Burning!’ Unfortunately, those in charge of disposal often didn’t know Michael Angelo from Mickey Mouse, and thousands of innocuous, even extremely rare books were Pulped!

A list of 35,000 books were banned as well as all textbooks published from 1933 to 1945. All publications and materials were ordered by the Allied ‘Re-Education’ teams to be “Released to the Commanders of each Zone to be destroyed.”
They were removed from all libraries, schools, universities, research institutes, academies, technical or academic societies, book-stores, publishing houses and even from private homes… then destroyed.
This massive, haphazard vandalism was carried out by Communists, Jewish Partisans and other unqualified people from 1946 to 1952, where many books were lost forever due to careless storage and handling, as well as deliberate eradication, all under the battle cry of making the world a safer place.

This was the greatest campaign of book destruction of all time and ended up being applied not only to the apparent offending books, but to poetry, philosophy, musical verse, calendars, horse books, books about trade and agriculture, driving manuals, books about flowers, home building, barns, astronomy, plumbing, poets, tennis and books about gardening. Hundreds of years of the most ingenuitive, classical and virtuous German history and culture, were lost due to this arrogant abuse of authority, brazen incompetence and total ignorance.

Books about birds made the list, as well as books by Friedrich the Great, Bismarck and antique European military history books and chronicles. Popular children’s books, including rare editions of the Brothers Grimm, were pulped on the grounds that they “Provoked violence.” Everything about the Olympic Games of 1936, the most innovative and greatest Games the world had known to that date, was banned! Books by the ancient poets were pulped. Even books once banned (not burned) by the National Socialists were destroyed too!? Sloppy handling caused the loss of the entire musical works of Richard Strauss and many Gutenberg bibles were fried in this orgy of stupidity.

Of Morgenthau’s Plan for ‘Re-Education’ titled, “Education and Propaganda” stated;

(a) All schools and universities will be closed until an Allied Commission of Education has formulated an effective reorganization program. It is contemplated that it may require a considerable period of time before any institutions of higher education are reopened. 
Meanwhile the education of German students in foreign universities will not be prohibited. 
Elementary schools will be reopened as quickly as appropriate teachers and textbooks are available. 
(b) All German radio stations and newspapers, magazines, weeklies, etc. shall be discontinued until adequate controls are established and an appropriate program formulated.”

Further testament to the intentions of the Victorious All-lies to annihilate German memory and not to free Germany, in jurisdiction, movement or mind, is the Secret Treaty (Geheimer Staatsvertrag), enacted two days prior to the enactment of the German [Occupational] Provisional Constitution on 23 May 1949, which gave complete All-lied control over electronic and print media, film, culture and education until the year 2099 – 150 years of thought control secretly given to the U.K., France and the U.S. for west Germany.
The Treaty also provided for the confiscation of Germany’s gold reserves to be held in the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which the Rothschilds have a 57% shareholding. (See: here)

Beginning with ‘Re-Education’ at the end of the War, Occupational Germany has continued the strict censorship imposed by the Soviet and the Allied occupiers. Even today, using the ‘Special history’ excuse, the Internationalist occupiers forbid ‘Nationalistic’ books, songs and symbols, making them completely illegal, even in private, in Austria and Germany; and, the Occupational Authorities in Germany have been aggressive in trying to expand its own strict laws beyond its borders.
Almost all prosecutions of censorship violations have taken place in connection with what they term Holocaust ‘Revisionism’ or ‘Denial.’ Merely questioning an aspect, re-analysing data, expressing a maverick theory or trying to revise a statistic pertaining to this subject, is lumped under ‘Holocaust Denial’ and ‘Hate Speech’ which is illegal not only in Germany and Austria, but in most of Europe.
“To have failed to write about a particular historical event in a balanced manner” (hypocrisy?) is a crime that can send an amateur historian to jail and he will often serve a longer sentence than a paedophile or serial rapist.

Thousands of people have been convicted of violating European ‘Denial’ laws – thought control policies – and they are currently languishing in European dungeons. Cases prosecuted under these laws go unchallenged even when the convicted parties were pacifists and never proposed violence, but were simply expressing their opinion. In the cases of scientists, artists, singers or writers convicted of this offence, their homes and businesses are raided and their work is destroyed by the state. Worse, the definition of ‘Denial’ is being broadened and is defined today as ‘Hard-Core’ and ‘Soft-Core’ Denial, the latter including discussion of the Allied War-Crimes of the Terror-Bombing Campaign against historic and civilian Germany, as well as the Expulsions of ethnic German women, children and the elderly after the war. Even liberal writers extremely critical of the Third Reich have been tarnished as ‘Soft-Core Deniers’ when they came out with books discussing the heavy toll of Allied Terror-Bombing upon the German civilian population during the war, slaughtering millions of innocents, in defiance of all international law, to which no-one has ever stood accountable.

But be sure to remember how those Evil Germans banned societal rotting books, which is purportedly an ideology the Allied ‘Liberators’ have saved humanity from ever having inflicted upon them again.
“Never Again”?

1948 comicsIn 1948, children – overseen by priests, teachers, and parents – publicly burned several hundred comic books in both Spencer, West Virginia, and Binghamton, New York. Once these stories were picked up by the national press wire services, similar events followed in many other cities. Beginning in 1948, Fredric Wertham wrote and spoke widely, arguing about the detrimental effects that comics reading had on young people. Consequently, his book ‘Seduction of the Innocent’ serves as a culminating expression of his sentiments about comic books.

No-one ever accused these parents, teachers and priests of being evil for protecting their children’s’ minds from rot.


Further reading from Revisionist – Here

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic


Bergen-Belsen: The Scape-Goating of Josef Kramer

Featured Image: Entry at Bergen-Belsen Warning of Typhus, 1945.

14,000 Internees Die After British Occupation

April 15, 1945, after mutual negotiations with German Officers, British troops apparently “liberated” (by occupation) the Bergen-Belsen transit and sick camp.
The British troops who took over administration of the Belsen camp, three weeks before the official end of the war, were shocked by the many unburied corpses and dying inmates they encountered. Horrific photos and films of the camp’s emaciated corpses and mortally sick inmates, were quickly circulated around the western nations.
Within weeks, the British military occupation newspaper proclaimed to the world:

“The story of that greatest of all exhibitions of ‘man’s inhumanity to man’ which was Belsen Concentration Camp is known throughout the world.”

The narrative that accompanied the horrid imagery, was, as it is today, a gross distortion of the camp’s true history.

Nordhausen bombed - CopyThe world was aghast with the propaganda narration of the Glorious Allies, which accompanied the imagery expounded around the world. The first repeated imagery drilled into the eyes of naive westerners in their quiet, war-free lands, were initially from only two camps; Bergen-Belsen and Nordhausen – the latter a hospital camp, purely for the sick and, predominantly, did not accommodate Jews.
Unlike Bergen-Belsen, one hundred percent of the deaths at Nordhausen, in the imagery (left), in fact, died as a Direct Result of Allied aerial warfare; bombing the hospital camp and adjacent town full of innocent civilians, into rubble – 3/4 of the town was flattened, killing 8,800 people and 3 – 4,000 sick inmates in the hospital camp – April 3rd & 4th, 1945. Whereas, the Bergen-Belsen deaths were an Indirect Result of the same allied aerial warfare. However, the deaths at both camps (and all others), have been blamed on Evil Germans and their alleged systematic Extermination Policy, via allied war propaganda – the victors version of events!
Any atrocity propaganda disseminated by the allies thereafter, was accepted without question, as the stage of horror and German guilt had already been set in the minds of the unsuspecting public, by the misrepresentation of Belsen and Nordhausen. This also misdirected any attention away from questioning the war crimes, crimes against humanity and sadistic conduct of the allies, or, it colloquially justified it when discovered.
This version of events, was a successful attempt at ensuring that public opinion (published opinion) would naively accept that the sacrifice of their own sons and daughters, was worthy for a noble cause in the pursuit of world peace for humanity… a peace the war-mongering victors are still yet to find ever since, as they seek out and bomb one alleged Evil Enemy after another, in a whirl-wind of consecutive geopolitical aims.

1298169The first camp in question, concerning the ghastly images that were captured by Allied photographers at Bergen-Belsen in mid-April 1945 – widely reproduced ever since – have greatly contributed to the camp’s reputation as a notorious systematic extermination center. However, in actuality, the dead of Bergen-Belsen were, above all, unfortunate victims of war and its turmoil. It can be verifiably argued that the effects created by the Allied destruction of the entire European theatre – through the terrorism of their Obliteration Bombing policy, created the very conditions that led to their deaths… war conditions, not  Extermination Policy – as the British enacted and, with the joint-coordination of the U.S., systematically implemented in their genocidal campaign upon Germany.

Belsen served as a Transitional Camp, where more than 9,000 Jews with citizenship papers or passports for Latin American countries, entry visas for Palestine, or other documents making them eligible for emigration, arrived at Bergen-Belsen in late 1943 and 1944, from Poland, France, Holland and other parts of Europe. During the final months of the war, several groups of these emigre’s were transported from Axis-occupied Europe. German authorities transferred several hundred to neutral Switzerland and, at least one group of 222 Jewish internees was transferred from Belsen to British-Mandate Palestine.

Up until late 1944, conditions were generally better than in other camps. Marika Abrams, a Jewish woman from Hungary, was transferred from Auschwitz in 1944 and her testimony confirms the hygienic and routine conditions at Belsen, even that late in the war. Years later she recalled just her arrival at Belsen;

“…We were each given two blankets and a dish. There was fresh running water and latrines….The conditions were so superior to Auschwitz, we felt we were practically in a sanitarium.”

Inmates received three meals a day. Coffee and bread were served in the morning and evening, with cheese and sausage when available. The main mid-day meal consisted of one litre of vegetable stew and bread. Families also lived together, otherwise, in keeping with the morality of the day, men and women were housed in separate barracks and for their safety from other potentially dangerous inmates. This was not just ethical, but due to the NSDAP’s strict adherence to the Third Geneva Convention, which Germany was not only signatory to since 1929, but it was Ratified by Hitler in February 1934.

Part I: Article III
“Prisoners of war are entitled to respect for their persons and honour. Women shall be treated with all consideration due to their sex.”

During the final months of the war, tens of thousands of refugees were evacuated west to Belsen from Auschwitz and other eastern camps, that were either deteriorating due to war conditions or were increasingly threatened by the advancing Jewish-Bolsheviks. German officials of the camps gave the internees the choice to stay or leave with them as they evacuated… a great majority voluntarily left with German officials, to avoid the encroaching Red Army, while those too sick to travel remained (pursuant to Part III: Article IX).
Belsen became severely overcrowded as the number of inmates increased from 15,000 in December 1944, to 42,000 at the beginning of March 1945, while it rapidly increased to more than 50,000, less than one month later… many bringing with them disease infested lice, due to the conditions of the war-torn east.

So catastrophic had conditions become during the final months of the war, that about a third of the prisoners evacuated to Belsen in February and March 1945, perished during the journey and were dead on arrival, as well as German officials… many also being shot up by Allied fighter planes, which strafed anything and anyone that moved, even trainloads full of people and camp supplies.

As order broke down across Europe during those chaotic final months of the war, regular deliveries of food and medicine to the camp stopped. Foraging trucks were sent out to scrounge up whatever supplies of bread, potatoes and turnips that were available in nearby towns, trying to evade Allied strafing during the task… often not returning.

Epidemic Typhus

Disease was kept under control by routinely disinfecting all new arrivals – pursuant to Part II: Article XIII of the Third Geneva Convention, in order to “Prevent Epidemics”. But in early February 1945, a large transport of infected Hungarian transports was admitted while the disinfection facility was out of order. As a result, typhus broke out and quickly spread beyond control.

Commandant Josef Kramer quarantined the camp in an effort to save lives, but SS Camp Administration headquarters in Berlin – unaware of how extreme conditions had become – insisted that Belsen be kept open to receive still more evacuees arriving from the East.


The worst killer was typhus, but typhoid fever and dysentery also claimed many lives. Aggravating the situation was a policy during the final months of transferring already sick inmates from other camps to Belsen, which was then officially designated a Sick or Convalescence Camp (Krankenlager). The sick women of Auschwitz, for example, were transferred to Belsen in three groups in November-December 1944.

[Disease being the cause of death, is confirmed by Dr. Charles Larson, leading Forensic Pathologist, Colonel of the U.S. Medical Corps, assigned to the Judge Advocate Generals Department and the only Forensic Pathologist in the entire European war theatre – see here]

Hair cutsWhen SS chief, Heinrich Himmler, learned of the typhus outbreak at Bergen-Belsen, he immediately issued an order to all appropriate officials requiring that;
“All medical means necessary to combat the epidemic should be employed… There can be no question of skimping either with doctors or medical supplies.”

[Above image: Removal of infested clothing, lice-infested hair removal and baths away from other internees, to help combat the Typhus Epidemic – Officers right]

However, the general breakdown of order that prevailed on Germany by this time, made it completely impossible to implement the command.

Kramer Reports a ‘Catastrophe’

make-shift tentsIn a March 1, 1945, letter to Gruppenfuhrer (General) Richard Glucks, head of the SS camp administration agency, Commandant Kramer reported in detail on the catastrophic situation that was amplifying in Bergen-Belsen, and pleaded for help:
[Right: Make-shift tents erected in desperate measures]

Supply: When I took over the camp, winter supplies for 1500 internees had been indented for; some had been received, but the greater part had not been delivered. This failure was due not only to difficulties of transport, but also to the fact that practically nothing is available in this area and all must be brought from outside the area …“If I had sufficient sleeping accommodation at my disposal, then the accommodation of the internees who have already arrived and of those still to come would appear more possible. In addition to this question a spotted fever and typhus epidemic has now begun, which increases in extent every day. The daily mortality rate, which was still in the region of 60-70 at the beginning of February, has in the meantime attained a daily average of 250-300 and will increase still further in view of the conditions which at present prevail.

For the last four days there has been no delivery [of food] from Hannover owing to interrupted communications, and I shall be compelled, if this state of affairs prevails till the end of the week, to fetch bread also by means of truck from Hannover. The trucks allotted to the local unit are in no way adequate for this work, and I am compelled to ask for at least three to four trucks and five to six trailers. When I once have here a means of towing, then I can send out the trailers into the surrounding area… The supply question must, without fail, be cleared up in the next few days. I ask you, Gruppenführer, for an allocation of transport…

State of Health: The incidence of disease is very high here in proportion to the number of internees. When you interviewed me on Dec. 1, 1944, at Oranienburg, you told me that Bergen-Belsen was to serve as a sick camp for all concentration camps in north Germany. The number of sick has greatly increased, particularly on account of the transports of internees that have arrived from the East in recent times – these transports have sometimes spent eight or fourteen days in open trucks…

The fight against spotted fever is made extremely difficult by the lack of means of disinfection. Due to constant use, the hot-air delousing machine is now in bad working order and sometimes fails for several days…

A catastrophe is taking place for which no one wishes to assume responsibility… Gruppenführer, I can assure you that from this end everything will be done to overcome the present crisis…

I am now asking you for your assistance as it lies in your power. In addition to the above-mentioned points I need here, before everything, accommodation facilities, beds, blankets, eating utensils – all for about 20,000 internees … I implore your help in overcoming this situation.”

These are not the words of a man purportedly keeping to so-called “Extermination Policy” rather, humane ethics and International Law. Kramer did everything in his power to reduce suffering and prevent death among the inmates, even appealing to the hard-pressed German army;

“I don’t know what else to do,” he told high-ranking army officers.
“I have reached the limit. Masses of people are dying. The drinking water supply has broken down. A trainload of food was destroyed by low-flying [Allied] war planes. Something must be done immediately.”

Working together with both Commandant Kramer and chief inmate representative Kuestermeier, Colonel Hanns Schmidt responded by arranging for the local volunteer fire department to provide water. He also saw to it that food supplies were brought to the camp from abandoned rail cars. Schmidt later recalled in regards to Kramer;

“…He worked with great dedication to improve conditions in the camp. For example, he rounded up horse drawn vehicles to bring food to the camp from rail cars that had been shot up.”

Kramer later explained to incredulous British military interrogators: “I was swamped…”

“The camp was not really inefficient before you [British and American forces] crossed the Rhine. There was running water, regular meals of a kind – I had to accept what food I was given for the camp and distribute it the best way I could. But then they suddenly began to send me trainloads of new evacuees from all over Germany. It was impossible to cope with them. I appealed for more staff, more food. I was told that this was impossible. I had to carry on with what I had.

Then as a last straw, the Allies bombed the electric plant that pumped our water. Loads of food were unable to reach the camp because of the Allied fighters. Then things really got out of hand. During the last six weeks I have been helpless. I did not even have sufficient staff to bury the dead, let alone segregate the sick… I tried to get medicines and food for the inmates and I failed. I was swamped. I may have been hated, but I was doing my duty.”

Josef KramerKramer’s clear conscience is also suggested by the fact that he made no effort to save his life by fleeing, but instead calmly awaited and negotiated with British forces, naively confident of decent treatment.
Nor does this reconcile with the ‘Systematic German Killing Machine’ which we are told of, where Germans went to great lengths to conceal mass murder by burning bodies and documents of internees, as with Auschwitz – the purported proof being pivotal on, non-existent evidence?

When the Belsen Camp was eventually taken over by the Allies, he later stated, “I was quite satisfied that I had done all I possibly could, under the circumstances, to remedy the conditions in the camp.”

British Occupation

British 2nd Army at Belsen, April 1945

Right: Officers of the British 2nd Army and two Officers of the Wehrmacht, negotiate the agreement regarding the transfer of the neutral territory of the Belsen camp to the British Army, 12th April, 1945. Subsequently the 11th Armoured Division occupied the camp, 15 April, 1945. As British forces approached Bergen-Belsen, German authorities sought to turn over the camp to the British, so that it would not become a combat zone spreading disease and endangering the inmates further, or anybody else in the vicinity.

Two German officers presented themselves before the British outposts and explained that there were 9,000 sick in the camp and that all sanitation had failed. They proposed that the British should occupy the camp at once, as the responsibility was an international issue in the interests of health. In return for the delay caused by the truce, the Germans offered to surrender intact the bridges over the river Aller. After consideration, the British senior officer rejected the German proposals, saying it was necessary that the British should occupy an area of ten kilometers around the camp in order to be sure of keeping their troops and lines of communication away from the disease. After some time, it was peacefully transferred, with an agreement that “both British and German troops will make every effort to avoid battle in the area.”

Joined Typhus Photos

kramer-in-court-during-belson-trial-w339b-y2k-the-camp-kommandant-b3p580Shackled Monster of Belsen

Despite the obvious situation and conditions Bergen-Belsen was suffering, Commandant Kramer, who was vilified in the British and American press as “The Beast of Belsen” and “The Monster of Belsen,” was put on trial and then executed, along with chief physician, Dr. Fritz Klein, Irma Grese and other camp officials.
At his trial, Kramer’s defense attorney, Major T.C.M. Winwood, predicted:

“When the curtain finally rings down on this stage Josef Kramer will, in my submission, stand forth not as ‘The Beast of Belsen’ but as ‘The Scapegoat of Belsen’.”

In an “act of revenge,” the British [so-called] liberators, expelled the civilian German residents of the nearby town of Bergen, and then permitted camp inmates to loot the houses and buildings. Much of the town was also set on fire.

The obvious Typhus fear spreading Europe – as the Allies barbarous aerial campaign creating the diseased conditions – intensified, signs, posters and flyers were posted wherever possible, warning in concentrated areas.

according to wikipedia

According to Wikipedia: Epidemic Typhus is also known as ‘Camp Fever’ – ‘War Fever’ and ‘Famine Fever’ etc. Resulting from society and sanitary conditions from wars and other disasters.

quarantine teamHOWEVER, when the British took control of the camp, the new Allied administrators proved no more capable of mastering the chaos than the Germans had, despite all their assistance with quarantine teams, man power, hygiene and medical supplies, while not being hindered by war-planes, supplies and transports, as the German administration were.

The notorious Bergen-Belsen camp where – according to Court Historians – purportedly 50,000 – 100,000 inmates (although a maximum of 60,000 ever passed through) were supposedly murdered – it was actually, about 7,000 inmates who died during the period when the camp existed under German administration, from 1943 to 1945.

Quarantine team, 2

However, they died in the final months of the war as a result of disease and malnutrition – consequences of the allied carpet bombings and fighter planes shooting up everything that moved on road or rail, which had completely disrupted normal deliveries of medical supplies and food – not to mention creating the very conditions where the killer diseases thrived and exploded into epidemic proportions.
This was an expected catastrophe the Allies would have been quite well aware of, not only through their intercepts of German record transmissions (such as Josef Kramer’s to Gruppenfuhrer Richard Glucks, above) and all communications decoding of and by the Enigma machine, but also through their own historical experience of thousands dying from epidemic diseases in American concentration camps during their Civil War, thousands dying in the British concentration camps during the Boer War, the thousands of Philippino’s who died in American concentration camps during their Genocide of 3 million Philippino’s and, every war since then – WITHOUT EXCEPTION! – where war-time diseases had always claimed more lives than those lost in combat. In fact, the Typhus Epidemic from WWI had not been completely over-come by the onset of WWII and had actually been exasperated by the activities of the war.
In this instance, the Allies intentionally played on this expected suffering of war-time diseases, in the pursuit of a political narrative, amplifying it with more easily distributed, internationally coordinated, means of photographic sharing and publishing, than what was ever available before.

The ‘Human Laundry’ was created in a former barracks. There were 20 cleansing stations where internees were treated with delousing powder and their infected skin scrubbed clean. Units were brought in with protective sanitary clothing to deal with the sick and the dead, all German nurses and treating women were given white headdresses to prevent the spread of lice and, British Officers continued to treat those suspected to be not yet infected…

…despite this highly organised attempt at combating the war time disease, almost 14,000 internees died at Bergen-Belsen in the months following the British Occupation… twice as many than under German Administration!

Belsen sign

The Memorial Sign that stands at Bergen-Belsen, attests to the post-British-occupation deaths, but somehow, they are still attributed to alleged ‘German Atrocities’?


Unless of course, the “Evil Germans” had effectively trained the typhus-ridden lice to ignore British command and to continue killing in their absence?


Burning Belsen

A further measure in attempt to overcome the Typhus Epidemic, was to destroy a certain number of the urine, dysentery and Typhus ridden barracks, by setting them on fire. Claimed now by the latter-day ‘Exterminationists’ that it was a poignant ceremony to delete the memory of purported ‘German Atrocities’ – a therapeutic exercise?
However, this narrative does not reconcile with the desperation for accommodations for the internees, or the fact that the majority of the facilities were still utilised and left untouched after British occupation.


A fine example of hysteria propaganda mixed with truths at the time.  Acknowledgement of the obvious Epidemic, not uncommon knowledge since the Great War, blended with atrocity propaganda pulling numbers out of thin air. 7 million just at Treblinka alone? This exceeds the forever-changing numbers of Auschwitz. Could anyone even find 7 million corpses then alone count them, if they were allegedly burned to unrecognised ashes and bull-dozed?

Yossl RosensaftFrom 1945 until 1950, when it was finally shut down, the British maintained Belsen as a camp for ‘Displaced Persons’ (DP’s). It mostly continued as a sick and transitional camp for emigrants, no differently than it had under German administration, but now, they were mostly directed to Palestine.
During this period it achieved new notoriety as a major European black market center. Many Jewish-Partisans who made their way to Belsen, used it as a place for organising training for the Jewish-insurgency in Palestine, the illegal smuggling to Palestine (Aliyah-Bet) and, using much of the unlimited U.S. Occupation Marks (courtesy of U.S. tax payers) and $3.7 billion UNRRA funding, for Zionist purposes. The “Uncrowned King” of Belsen’s 10,000 Jews was Yossl (Josef) Rosensaft, who amassed tremendous profits from the illegal trading in arms, art and diamonds – looted from the Germans – and, from Jewish sponsors. Rosensaft had been interned in various camps, including Auschwitz (more miraculous survival stories no doubt) before arriving at Belsen in early April 1945… He now turned his attention to demonising the British, who not only “Liberated” the camp he conducted his criminal business from, but who were the Mandate Government of Palestine… the very land the Jews sought to usurp for a ‘Jewish State’ without British oversight and, agitated against a restricted Reservation’ as proferred by some NSDAP members.
With all his opining and rousing for a Jewish State in Palestine, Rosensaft decided to not live in Occupied Palestine himself, but lived and traveled between Switzerland, America and London, dying at the latter, leaving great debts for the ‘acquisition’ of the art and other unearned lavishness.

Just as the Germans had finished the same losing battle against Jewish-guerrilla warfare predominantly in the east, the English then had to turn their attention to British-Mandate Palestine and, fight terrorist war there, against Jews themselves… which they also lost and, so too, are the Palestinians.

A Life-Saving warning Sign from German Camps:
“One Louse = Your Death”

German camp sign

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Latvia: Year of Horror, 1940 – The Year Assimilated Jews Turned on Their Neighbours


The following contains disturbing imagery
Parental guidance is highly recommended

Latvia: Year of Horror. is an highly illustrated, chronological eyewitness and documented account of the suffering the Latvian people endured at the hands of the Jewish-Bolshevik invaders and, the assimilated Latvian-Jews, who, in the summer of 1940, began a slaughterous oppression with the arrival of the Jewish Red Army.

It all started on the 15th of June 1940, at 2:30am, when the NKVD raided a Latvian Boarder Post, then with the Red Army invasion of the Latvian Territory and occupation of Riga, on the 17th of June, 1940. Latvia’s terror started at once with the mass arrests, murders and/or deportations of its leaders to far regents of Bolshevik Russia, as revolutionary criminals were released from Latvian prisons, to assist the Red Army and replace the slain and deported in their positions. It followed later with thousands of Latvians being arrested without warrant, loaded onto railway freight carriages and deported to the far east to join their leaders in frost-bitten death camps, or they were just outright murdered in their homeland. This left the blood-soaked nation leaderless, until the onset of the preemptive German mobilisation of Operation Barbarossa against the Soviet aggression toward the west, who arrived in Latvia on Sunday June 22, 1941 and, finally arrived at Riga on July 1, 1941. They were welcomed as Liberators by the Latvian people, who then turned their suffering into revenge against many of the Jewish occupiers… but they are now referred to as ‘Pro-Nazi Sympathisers and Collaborators’ by the victors.

The highly illustrated booklet, ‘Latvia: Year of Horror‘ is reproduced below with only formatting, spelling and minimal translation amendments for comprehension purposes, but has been kept as close as possible to the original 1942 translation and accuracy of detailed facts. The relevant video footage contained is an additional inclusion by Historical Tribune.

Latvia: Year of Horror

Latvia, Year of Horror - shadow

Edited by Paula Kovalevskis, Oskars Noritis and Mikelis Goppers. Published by Zelta Abele, 1942.

Latvia: Year of Horror, is a collection of photos and documents covering the communist rule in Latvia from June 17, 1940 to July 1, 1941. This book shows communism as it was in reality — cloaked in deception and lies, filled with inhuman cruelties, reveling in torture and blood, sadistic in its delight in the lamentations of sufferers, and infinite in revenge and destruction. An unfathomable darkness, a madness, a mockery of honour and a rejection of all virtue sought to annihilate nothing less than the soul of the Latvian nation, a people for more than 4,000 years.

Latvia: Year of Horror, an historical, unexpurgated publication, not adhering to any political fashion or line, has the blessing of God. These are the plain facts. There are no grounds to consider it anti-Semitic literature.”
~ Reverend Karlis Zuika


The reprinting of Baigais Gads (Latvia: Year of Horror) is not only laudable and welcome, it is also necessary. This book deals with a turning point in Latvian history, which must not remain hidden.
Latvia: Year of Horror, was the first (1942) and, at this moment, the only full documentation of the horrible events of 1940. It offers a precise witness account of that time in Latvian history.
It is an historical documentation of the now, all-but-forgotten events in Latvia of that horrible summer of 1940. It is a period of time filled with tragedy. A manipulation of historical events to suit today’s needs is not allowable… These are the facts!

To read the later adapted Introduction to Latvia: Year of Horror, see here, pages 3 – 5.

The Beginning

On June 15/16, 1940, many Latvians had gathered to attend the song festival in Daugavpils. This was to be the last such festival for free Latvians for almost half a century. The attack by Stalin’s communists on the night of June 14, 1940 was the prelude to Latvia’s road of suffering. The orgy of bloodshed had begun. On this night, the “great Eastern neighbour” — the Soviet Union — after a silence of 23 years, took the first step in the dance of death on Latvian soil. Their invasion was their calling card and showed how the Bolsheviks betrayed their commitments undertaken in the Mutual Assistance Pact of 1939.

Latvia, Border Guard, article

  • Border Guard BodiesThey burned the quarters of Latvian border guards in the Maslenkis community in Augspils Township (above)
  • The half-burned body of border guard Macitis (top right).
  • The body of Hermine, wife of border guard Purins (middle right).
  • The body of border guard Beizaks. (bottom Right).
    The son of border guard Purins died in hospital from fatal injuries. Border guard Cimosko died with Beizaks. Forty-three border guards and nearby residents who tried to save the burning quarters were seized by the invading communists and taken across the border as prisoners.

These events took place at the very time that the Bolshevik press proclaimed: “The Soviet Union has maintained and continues to maintain a policy that is beneficial and to the highest degree pro-Latvian.”

Arrival of Soviet troops

The arrival of the Bolsheviks in Riga, the Latvian capital, via the Iron Bridge.
View from the central market on the afternoon of June 17th, 1940.

The cynicism and bestiality shown by Soviet rule seemed unbelievable. The hypocrisy and falsification of truth were incomprehensible. Yet, they did happen. The official announcements by the Latvian Government protesting the invasion, had no effect. Moscow proceeded according to plan for the invasion and annexation of Latvia. These plans were thorough and far-reaching.

On the morning of June 17th, Latvia was overrun by the armed hordes of Communist Russia. Many of the invading troops were Asiatic units who could, thus, not speak to the victims.

Communist-instigated mob, incited disorder at Riga’s Police Headquarters

Riga Post Office, day of invasion

View at the Main Post Office in Riga on the day of the communist invasion.

Jews attack police, soldiers and officers

Attacks on the Latvian Police, on the Soldiers and Officers of the Latvian Army took place in the Capital and throughout the Country. Rocks were thrown at the Police by the Communist-instigated mob.

…But from the underground, sensing ideological allies in the Bolsheviks, there arose “the oppressed masses” groups of hooligans, criminals, vagabonds, many Jews, “the Chosen People”, to welcome the invaders and to attack the police as they tried to maintain order in the streets packed with the invading Soviet soldiers.
The Red Army arrived “to assure the realisation of the USSR and Latvia’s mutual assistance pact,” who embraced and protected the pro-communist rioters. Thus, the Soviets demonstrated who deserved their “mutual assistance” and it was not the Latvian nation at large.
Grimly silent, Latvians on the sidewalks were watching a real life drama, about which no one at the time could sense the horrific outcome of the final act.

Railroad station
After the dispersal of the mob, the area of the railroad station and around police headquarters was littered with rocks hurled by the communist rioters.

Riot arrestsThe Latvian institutions, not yet familiar with the practices of the Bolshevik invaders, attempted to enforce the laws of the land, in the belief that those who had incited the riot should be charged and punished. This was a bitter delusion. The Soviet Embassy explained that it was satisfied with the manner in which the Red Army’s arrival in Riga had been welcomed! The names of the hooligans charged for rioting indicate their mostly Jewish origin; Genech Kreiness, David Goldberg, Heim Klackin, Grigory Varuskin, Abramy Gemjanov, etc.

Puppet PresidentAll these events were legitimised. A new government took power on orders from Moscow. The duly constituted Latvian Government was replaced. At left: Puppet President, Professor Kirchensteins addresses the crowd, with Peter Blaus and Julius Lacis. Demonstrators requested and got the legalisation of the Latvian Communist Party.

Jews in Power in Latvia - Copy
The sensitive ear of the Latvian Communist Party’s first Secretary, Kalnberzins-Zakis, who carefully noted the “just demands of the nation“, in reality, his orders were from Moscow.

Jewish Signs

What Nationality were they? The language and characters on the signs indicate, clearly – Jews!

Comrade VishinkiThe master of Ceremonies of all events planned by Moscow, the Chairman of the Supreme Soviet, of the Soviet Union, Comrade Vishinski (at left), greeted the “friendly” demonstrators and stated his belief that, in the future, the Soviet and Latvian flags would fly side by side. The future would reveal this to be a barefaced lie and would expose the cynical intentions behind this statement.

On June 21st, workers were forcibly driven out into the streets to participate in a “demonstration of joy” to hail, with many enthusiastic Jews, their own future murderers. The Soviet power, already having taken under its wing the crowd of hooligans, now released prisoners guilty of illegal political activities. Sadly, it did not occur to the new puppet government that the USSR would establish its “pro-Latvian policy” with the aid of Enemies of the State! This coerced demonstration in Riga, was a forerunner of future manufactured “support” for the planned implementation of Soviet power.

Jewish crowd awaits the release of prisoners

Mostly Jewish crowd awaits the release of political prisoners from Central Prison in Riga.

Newly Released Prisoners Parade

Newly released criminals parade out of prison.

Jewish Prisoners article

Prisoners, accompanied by largely Jewish crowd and the coerced crowd of demonstrators, enter the street. A Prisoner addresses the crowd. His face clearly contorted with hate and a desire to destroy.

Jewish crowd at soviet embassyThe prisoners and crowd of Jews were of one mind: the Soviets in power were their real friends. The Soviet Embassy on Anthony Street, was the den where the local hirelings fulfilled Moscow’s plans. The masses had no notion of their contents. Many even opined – as did many gullible people in the West – that, in its 23 years of existence, communism had changed for the better.
The largely Jewish crowd cheered the speaker addressing the crowd. Their “roaring cheers for the liberators” became understandable only later.

[left] Deported or escaped anti-government Bolsheviks returned from Sweden. It is not necessary to note that most of them were Jews. [centre] The former Spanish Civil War Red Front volunteers, are greeted by Jewish functionaries. [right] Simultaneously, Red Army soldiers staged performances in the city’s parks and gardens, displaying their “culture” and diverting attention from the destruction planned for the Latvian nation. Everything proceeded according to plan.

All interested in the destruction of the state of Latvia, of the Latvian nation and the ruin of its values, had now met and joined arms. The team of destroyers were now in place.
With forces unified, the destruction of the existing system, order and values could begin. A fearless hand stabbed in the back, the nation’s greatest and best organised guard and support: the Latvian Army was to be Bolshevised! This task was entrusted to largely Jewish hands.

Abraham GenkinsPictured left  and below on the left, is one of the new power brokers, Abraham Genkins, a Jew. He had been a soldier in the Latvian Army in the Courland Division, Labour – that is, a punishment or military prisoner – Commando in Liepaja. He had been arrested for subversive activities. With the arrival of the Bolsheviks, this criminal was promoted to the rank of “Politruk” (Political Commissar) in the Artillery Division. He is seen wearing the uniform of a Latvian Army officer (below left).


Latvian Army training for criminalsInto the Latvian Army, “Politruks” – Political Commissars – with no military training and often without even grade school education – were introduced. Frequently, they had criminal pasts and were promoted at once, to the ranks of Captain or Colonel. The first and essential condition of their appointment was that the army must not be a-political. [image right] “Political Indoctrination” session during training in one Latvian Army unit. On the left, a “Politruk.”

The work of destruction continued feverishly. It was necessary to falsify the wishes of the nation in order to ratonalise actions, to which no one with common sense would agree. On July 15/16, in elections for the Saeima, the Parliament, the people were compelled to vote for only one existing slate and were forcibly driven to the polls. Afterwards, holders of passports that did not have a stamp indicating they had participated in the voting, were considered to be traitors! Propaganda signs in Russian and such coercive methods, left no doubt about the purpose, persistence and relentlessness of Bolshevik intentions.

Forced Marches to vote

One of the forced marches from work to voting stations where there was only one choice on the ballot.

Latvian SSR Founded

The fateful “newly elected” session of the Saeima opened on July 21, 1940. There, the destiny of Latvia was to be decided and the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR) was founded.

To Moscow!

Prof. Kirchensteins

Professor Kirchensteins and the Soviet Ambassador at the Riga railroad station, leaving for Moscow.

Official statistics show that, in spite of coercion of the voting process, a significant number of voters abstained. Therefore, the new Soviet rulers announced that participation in the election had been nearly 100% of the electorate. The new members of the Saeina, elected as they were in forced and staged elections, now took the next step of high treason and resolved to approve the annexation of Latvia to the Soviet Union.

Professor Kirchensteins, the new President-in-waiting, undertook the task of begging Moscow for mercy to realize this goal. This was done. All obstacles to Bolshevik plans had been removed.

Jew Crowd
The real meaning of these events was best expressed in the rejoicing of so many Jews. For the Latvian nation, the hardest moments of awareness and a crucial test of its very existence, had arrived.

In Moscow, the long planned sequence of events reached its conclusion. The Latvian nation had been dragged to a threshold, the crossing of which was designed to erase it from the registry of nations forever!

Ecstatic JewsIt was no secret what the result of Professor Kirchensteins’ trip would be. This was to be the last act in a masterfully directed drama. It was to prove to the world that the Latvian nation “ardently wishes to join the family of other nations in the Soviet Union.”

The request to incorporate Latvia into the Soviet Union was in the hands of the press on the day of Kirchenstein’s arrival in Moscow. However, Moscow already knew what it wanted and what was to be done.

Everything proceeded as planned. On August 5th, 1940, the fate of Latvia was sealed.

[right] Most Jews were ecstatic. The demonstrations on August 5th, turned into Jewish National celebrations.

Jews request the annexation of Latvia

With the Communist Revolutionary fist salute, Jews request the annexation of the State of Latvia to the Soviet Union.

The State of Latvia Ceases to Exist on August 5th

Like a mockery of truth, the Soviet newspaper, Izvestia, reported on August 6th: “Yesterday, the U.S.S.R. Supreme Soviet separately voting by chambers unanimously agreed to accept the request of Latvia’s Saeima to include the Latvian SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic) into the U.S.S.R.’s fraternal family of nations.”

Soviet Paper Aug 6th, 1940

Jews Rejoice

The Jews rejoiced most.

The following day, large numbers of Jews in Latvia again rejoiced, and their joy was unrestrained. However, Latvians driven into the streets to join in “gratitude” demonstrations were grim-faced. As of this moment, they had lost their free will and their destiny was completely in Moscow’s hands. There was only one road left open to the Latvian nation – to close ranks and with heads proudly raised, inspired by love and loyalty for the land of their fathers, to resist and meet the fate of martyrs.

Acting President

Acting President and Prime Minister, Prof. Kirchensteins

This man, Professor Kirchensteins, to make believable the grossly falsified will of the Latvian people, hypocritically lied:

“The workers of Latvia suffered from unemployment and lived in hunger… Every attempt to gain human subsistence and rights and to determine their own future, they paid for with suffering and torment, with incarceration of their best sons and daughters in prison and forced labour camps… Only the inclusion into the U.S.S.R. assures real independence, development of industry, agriculture, the blossoming of real national culture, brilliant and powerful rise of material and cultural well being…”

[As George Orwell would write in his novel, 1984, the Communist world peace is war and freedom is slavery.]

Loyal GuardsThe new communist power was established. Loyal guards and support had to be provided. Already operational was the Institute of Police Assistance Service “P.D.” With few exceptions, this was comprised of the dregs of society: thieves, burglars, cheats. This institution eventually became the People’s Militia. Many Jews and hardened criminals were entrusted with the organisation and supervision of these institutions.

Organiser of Militia, Isak Jewsinskis

Organiser of the Workers’ Guard & People’s Militia, a man with a long criminal record; a Jew, Izak Bucinskis

The duties of the police were assumed by the newly founded People’s Militia, although their primary task was not to fight crime. This concept lost its meaning when criminals were released from prisons and the leadership of security establishments were handed over to them. The militiamen had mastered shooting, in the event they had to face their own countrymen. Hardly able to read or write, they controlled identity documents in search of enemies of the new regime. These were considered to be anyone decently attired or intelligent looking.
Workers received arms and founded Workers’ Guards. Among them were women, there on the understanding they would not flinch when executing their duties.

Militia target practice

People’s Militia at Target Practice

[left] Militiamen check identity papers of pedestrians in Riga. [centre] The Workers’ Guard in formation in honour of the delegation from Moscow. The women of the Workers’ Guard. [right] To allay suspicions, many workers joined the Guard, even though they had no connections with the Bolsheviks. To justify the existence of this armed guard, the Bolsheviks invented horror stories about sabotage. The guards were guarding the factories against imaginary ghosts.

Bolshevik Cynicism

Bolshevik CynicismIn those few weeks was hidden the most horrible villainy of Bolshevik cynicism. From the very first days of the occupation rule, word spread like wildfire of the first wave of arrests. The prisons, emptied of recidivists, criminals, Bolshevik agents, subversives, spies and illegals, quickly filled with Latvian patriots. Former Latvian policemen were arrested for attempts to maintain order during the largely Jewish-incited riots in city streets. Every other Latvian who wore a uniform was arrested – soldiers, border guards, home guards – or those who were in a supervisory position in the former government offices, as well as judges who ruled in accordance with the prevailing law, and finally, those who openly and proudly announced their affiliation to the Latvian nation. Ironically, at the same time, the Bolsheviks proclaimed the equality and brotherhood of nations.

Unrest and agitation among the people grew. The nation, confused and shaken by events arranged by cynical and coldblooded minds, was facing an uncertain future and sensed the presence of danger. The occupation power was fighting the distrust and hatred of the nation. There would be no reprisals, the puppet regime promised! That had to be repeated again and again, not because this power attempted to establish and secure authority and regain the lost trust, but rather it exploited the existing and freshly and deliberately provoked antagonisms to arrive at its real goal: To Destroy “Harmful elements“. These elements were the whole independence-minded Latvian nation.

Street Signs

Streets were crowded with a variety of signs and displays on which much money was spent.

There shall be no reprisals.” These words encompass the oldest Bolshevik lie, their most horrible deeds perpetrated during the year of their rule. Words seemingly expressing trust and forgiveness hid the real intent of the Bolsheviks – the destruction of the Latvian nation.
When a year later, the ground opened up and the corpses disclosed the truth, it was more horrible than anything anyone had imagined or feared.
On the 26th International Bolshevik Youth Day, Latvians were again coerced. Students were ordered out into the streets. The Bolsheviks had to prove to the world that the nation and especially the youth understood and loved the new era and that they “freely and without coercion rejoiced in the establishment of Soviet power.Compulsory demonstrations were the best method to create this falsified effect.

Loudest Screamers

Again, the loudest screamers and the most ardent participants were Jews, the Chosen People, and the only real voluntary demonstrators.

Land Distribution Committee at Work

The Land Distribution Committee at work.

Farmland, livestock and inventory will be left intact.” Although new slogans and ever louder promises issued forth, nobody believed them anymore. Not one farmer believed that Latvian agriculture would be saved from the fate of the collectivised farms in the Soviet Union. The farmers gave up. They sensed the future. So, the Bolsheviks had to lie to mask their plans as much as possible. The Minister of Agriculture lied gladly.
Latvian farmers’ suspicions proved correct: farms were subdivided to give farm workers 10 hectares of land each, and minimal livestock to ensure that the new farmers would not thrive. This was the transition period to kolkhoz (collective) farms. Thus, 10,140 farmers were robbed of their land and livestock.

Quickly and deliberately, according to plans from Moscow, the poison of Bolshevism was fed into the flesh of the nation. More and more the spirit of the nation’s life and vitality was threatened. Next to the screaming agitation which paralysed people in demonstrations, the Bolsheviks used widespread and colourful signs and newspaper articles to feed their ideas into schools and places of higher education, even the University of Latvia. Youth everywhere, the healthiest and most positive resource of a nation, were subjected to these pernicious ideas. New “sciences” hitherto unknown on Latvia, were created – a Chair of Marxism-Leninism. The faculties of theology and philosophy were closed, the staff fired and arrested.

As new replacements were hired, their only qualifications were diplomas from the ‘Red Professorship Institute’. This institution prepared special instructors for the dissemination of Bolshevik ideas.. Often these so-called “professors” had problems with written material, but qualifications were based on the length of membership in the Communist Party and on the number of years spent in prisons. These men were chosen to be the new educators and leaders of Latvian youth.

Apart from the foregoing innovations, the Latvian Communist Youth Alliance was created with the task to Bolshevise the Latvian youth. To be successful, it had to mar the spirit of youth from childhood — by having them join the ‘Pioneer‘ organisation.

The wave of contradictions, lies and exploitation also swept over factory and office workers. Now they were to work according to impractical plans, goals, and targets, that could never be achieved. The Stakhanov movement created an artificial fever for raising production quotas, competitions between factories and firms to improve efficiency. This was a method to falsely mirror the wishes of the workers, compelling them often to work double time, instead of eight hours. This cruel shock movement drained and totally exploited the energy of the workers.

Simultaneously, to spiritually destroy the people, the Bolsheviks undermined the support of the nation’s economic and material life.. Depositors lost their life’s savings in banks and credit unions.. This most of all hurt the small and thrifty working man. To add to the misery, houses were repossessed, industry and transportation was nationalised, the farmers’ land was taken for the collectives, and tradesmen’s tools, equipment and apartment furnishings, were also nationalised.

Ironically, this entire program was called, “a fight for a better future, a fight for the ideals of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin.”

The tentacles of Bolsehvism had the flesh of the nation firmly in their grip. Only one result was foreseeable – spiritual helplessness and dullness, physical weakness and overexertion, preconditions firstly for slavery and then an animal-like existence.

Out on the Streets!  Out on the Streets!  Out on the Streets!
Demonstrations!   Demonstrations!   Demonstrations!

Such was the characteristic trademark of the Bolshevik era: shouted slogans, marches of communist supporters, locals and fifth columnists brought in from Soviet Russia, the tread of thousands of feet had to proclaim how to commemorate the day when the Dictatorship of the Proletariat was born, a day that promised paradise on earth.

In reality, these marches, slogan shouting and parades, had to try to drown out the noise of a life collapsing in ruins from Bolshevik poison and lies. The reality was an indictment of the Soviet occupation that had transformed life on earth in Latvia into a hell.

Job Seekers

Job Seekers at the Labour Exchange in Riga | Ads for job openings

Come wintertime, everybody was surprised by the new agitation method:

Labour Exchange

Ads in newspapers invited people to a Labour Exchange to fill innumerable vacancies and new jobs positions available. When long lines of the unemployed formed at the Exchange, the staff there knew nothing of these openings.


Persuasion at Home

Persuasion at Home!

January 12, 1941, was a day when Latvians were compelled to do what they did not want to – to vote for the deputies of the U.S.S.R. Higher Council (the Soviet “parliament” where, of course, there would be only one name, a communist, on the ballot). In addition to existing methods of driving out the voters, the Bolsheviks invented a new one, so-called “persuasion at home.

Meeting of USSR Higher Council

Bolshevik agents visited individual flats and apartments, then ordered in all residents to assemble in order to convince and explain to them the significance of the elections. It is not necessary to note that among the keenest visitors to these meetings were pro-communist Latvian Jews. When this method was not suitable, it was replaced by meetings in factories and at work, where the only visitors often were housewives and children.

Vote RegisterElections generally, under communism, one of the most underhanded and falsified methods of gauging the people’s will and conviction, on this occasion were engineered especially carefully. Everyone had to verify in advance that his name was on the register of the electorate. It was obligatory to vote. If one lacked the stamp on one’s identity documents, indicating that one had voted, one was liable to the risk of being classified as a “saboteur”. As always in this terrible time, Jews assumed key leadership roles.

Volunteers Vote

A “Volunteer” votes.

On January 8th, 1941, the newspaper Cima wrote:
“Who wishes the Latvian nation (!) the fortune of peaceful life, the joy of labour and new creation, the conviction of safety for self and family, and welfare for the nation, shall vote for the Bolshevik Party, for the candidate of the communistic and independent bloc.”

But there were no other candidates! It was not possible to abstain. The inevitable results were clear!

What was not clear, was to what extent this farce would ensure the safety of the Latvian nation and its families.

A few months passed and the mask of hypocrisy began to drop. The malignant, bloodthirsty cynical face of Bolshevism was revealed. There was no longer any need to hide. All the harm that could be inflicted on the live flesh of the nation had been done. The nation was disarmed, morally degraded and blindly subjugated. Now could begin the preparations for annihilation. The will of the nation was again falsified. The workers “demanded death” for the so-called “murderers”, those police officers, who, while on duty during the Soviet invasion of June 17, 1940, had attempted to maintain order in the streets against the Bolshevik mobs.

Workers Resolution Meeting

‘Workers Resolution’ meeting.

These “workers’ resolutions” occurred in the following manner. When workers announced that their desire to do certain assignments at the rate of “shock tempo” or when they “unanimously demanded the highest degree of punishment for the bloodthirsty [police] hounds”, the procedure was always the same. A representative from the Party or the Union arrived at the factory with a prepared resolution, read it aloud at a meeting of workers and asked if anyone opposed it. People who had seen relatives and friends arrested on the slimmest of suspicion, grimly stayed silent. This meant the resolution was “passed unanimously!”

It is tyrannical to murder, but worse is it to press a knife in the hand of one nation against its will for the purpose of killing its own countrymen. That was how the Bolsheviks acted. Their sadism took a form and there is not one more despicable: their method of falsifying a nation’s will, revealed a degree of callousness that few will want to forgive or forget.


Published call for murder

“No grace for murderers of workers: Masses of workers
demand highest punishment for 17th June executioners.”

We Stand For Peace!

Subjected to Bolshevism by force, the Latvians were coerced to take upon themselves “the fulfillment of proud duty to the motherland – the Soviet Union.” Latvian youth were doomed to be recruited into the Red Army.
A sign at the registration office proclaimed: “We stand for peace, but we are able to respond to the blows of warmongers.

Red Army Registration Office

“We Stand for Peace”

At a colourfully decorated Red Army recruitment office Communist agents lectured recruits on how dangerous to the Soviet Union was the “capitalist siege”. [below] At one time, even the Baltic States [with a combined population of fewer than 5-million!] “threatened” the borders of the USSR. It was no secret that the Soviet Union, while professing peace, was secretly preparing for war. The Baltic States offered a favourable base for an attack on Germany, and now – in an irony of fate – it came the turn of the Baltic youth to hand over their lives to the hated Bolshevik occupiers.

Political Lecture Red Army Recruits

Political Instruction Lecture to Red Army Recruits

Special attention was paid to Latvian youth. They had to become “True Bolsheviks.Pioneer – young communist – units were formed. MOPRA, a Red assistance organisation was legalised. The Komsomol (Young Communist League) was organised, with the goal of preparing future candidates for the Communist Party.
Tensions existed in classrooms. If any of the the pupils did not join the Pioneers, the communist educators considered their parents to be enemies of the socialist state. To be an “Enemy of the State” was to put oneself in grave danger.
With clenched teeth, many parents suppressed their opinions and silently observed their children joining the bearers of the “New Culture.

CHEKA Prison CorrodorThe historical Riga Castle was renamed the Pioneer Castle. While children in their innocent naivete enjoyed their youthful pleasures, their fathers disappeared from their homes, from their places of employment, often without a trace. For silent were the corridors of the CHEKA (the NKVD or Soviet Security Police). There was silence behind the closed doors of the prison cells. Silent were the employees of the CHEKA and the guards and silent too, were the few who, by a miracle, were able to return from the CHEKA prisons to civilian life. [Left] A corridor at the CHEKA prison.

Commi Fan-FareWhile the Latvian fathers continued to silently disappear, the communists continued to focus all the skill and ability of their propaganda machine, on unending demonstrations, complete with blaring signs and chanted slogans. The motley colours, exaggerated sizes of signs and, the artificial, blaring volume and noise on the one hand, sought to drown out the deep indignation, anger, despair and hatred hidden yet smouldering in the nation’ and, on the other hand, sought to cover the misdeeds and outrages flowing from the commands and orders of the new conquerors… In this respect, the May Day celebrations in Riga reached a pinnacle.

May Day Rabble, 1941

1941, May Day rabble in Riga

Youth worn out from endless marches

People, tired from endless marches, grew indifferent. Worn out from continual social competitions and long working hours, people grew indifferent to the outside world. The communists sought to demoralise the spirit of the Latvian nation and strangle it.



Placards  Placards  Placards!

Communist Placards of Tyrants

A typical communist demonstration with signs featuring portraits of the tyrants and slogans.

The Soviet people were reduced to the level of animals and were forced to see the image of their ruler and judge, Stalin, constantly before their eyes. This people-control concept was now imposed on Latvia.
The intentions of largely Jewish agitators, shown below left, sought to subject the masses to delusions and falsehoods. To this end, the propaganda plumbed new depths of wild exaggeration. Demonstrators were led by dancers and commandos to energize the spectacle.

Neither farmers nor townspeople were spared these endless demonstrations, they were sought out even in the most remote areas… [more “Home Persuasion”]

Rural Demonstrations

Bus and Freedom Decorations

Election Bus [left] and Decorations on “Freedom” Blvd at Riga [right].

Riga Latvian Association Building

The formerly attractive front of the Riga Latvian Association (then the Red Army) building, disfigured with signs

Bored WorkersCommunist operatives and their spies infiltrated every group of people and traveled to the farthest corners of the land.
Apart from ordinary meetings for the general public, meetings were called in factories and businesses so that Bolshevik agitators could preach to the workers the “Just cause of Marx-Engel-Lenin-Stalin.” The workers’ response is evident from their grim faces…

Ski Commandos

In some places, special Ski Commandos were organised to enlighten those “still remaining in fascistic darkness”

Djoo Radio

Jews used Radio contacts with Moscow

These were calculated to impress people with the might of Bolshevik technology and their “concern and limitless possibilities for improving the welfare of the workers.” Yet, at the same time, the people were coerced and egged on with inflammatory words to sign agreements to compete and raise productivity levels. Quantity not quality mattered. Even if the product was useless, the goal must be met!

[left] Workers at one factory sign on for a socialist production contest. [right] The manager, a Jew, explains to Latvian workers “the great significance” of graphs and plans.

Red Corner

The ‘Red Corner’ in one company at Riga

The walls of factories and businesses were covered with graphs and plans, not understood by many. The Latvian worker did his job. A Jewish director monitored him to see that he filled his quota. When, after work, the stressed and exhausted worker was, according to propaganda instructions, beckoned to the Red Corner, naturally he didn’t want to attend. This corner of devotion for Stalin and the Party, became the object of sarcastic remarks and the butt of innumerable jokes.
As well there were “bulletin board newspapers”, the assembly of which required much time and effort. They were read only by the Jewish censors… The purpose of the bulletin board was the creation of discord and betrayal, which are the primary supports for communist and Jewish power. The bulletin board papers openly and sharply criticised “undesirable occurrences and persons” in the factory, business or  institution. There were people who took advantage of this opportunity to settle old scores or to try to get ahead by denouncing others.

Bulletin Board

Typical Bulletin Board newspaper, with Stalin and Lenin as the stars

Starting with the first day of the invasion, the communists sought to promote the “heights of culture” and said that it would be brought to Latvia, a “culturally retarded” land. The new Russian cultural forms quickly swamped Latvia.

Russian Culture brought Latvia

The public performances of the Red Army in Riga’s gardens.
The serious deportment of soldiers in any other army would preclude such “cultural” clowning

Jewish Leaders of Latvian Literature
To pledge friendship to Soviet nations, the designated heavyweights of Latvian literature – Andrejs Upitis, Vilis Lacis, and Janis Niedra – donned Tajikistan morning gowns. This took place when thousands of Latvian sons and daughters were being deported on trains for slave labour.

Chairman of School BoardThe leaders of this new “culture” were mostly Jews, of course; for example, the Chairman of the School Board Bergmanis and his predecessor Grasmanis…

How deeply Judaism controlled all areas of Latvian life, is demonstrated by the fact that even managers of sports activities were almost all Jews [below].

Jewish sportsmen

Jewish sportsmen at one meeting during the Bolshevik era.

The report of one patriotic school director asked: “Where did communism lead our youth? Is it the only hope for the future of Latvian youth?” [handwritten letter below, with image of Communist star on a Christian church steeple]

School Director Report

[above left] Observe the real sign of communist culture: the Liberation Monument of Latgale (the sculptor K. Jansons) in Rezenkne at its unveiling and, now in ruins (photo not available) after the arrival of the communists… [above right] Crowd incited by communists, drags a cross they’d broken through Painis Cemetery in Riga.

Kosher meat line

They lined up for their kosher meat. They worship the cruel Jewish God who demands that animals be slaughtered slowly and tortured according to religious ritual.

“Do not believe in God. Do not believe in yourself. Do not believe in good or evil! Rise against everything and yourself, for then shall you leave the fortune of equality. For then shall you be easily dominated and enslaved… Therefore, will you become like animals for your spirit shall be broken.” This was the hidden intent of the mostly Jewish manipulators.

While Latvians had to endure the communist cynicism forced upon them, while people were set against one another, while churchgoers were persecuted and gravestones desecrated in the name of communism’s proclaimed “religious freedom”, the Jews continued to practice undisturbed their religion and traditions, for this particular “freedom” did not apply to them.

Anti-religious display“The most democratic constitution in the world”, Stalin’s constitution, said it allowed unlimited freedom of religion. However, the communists organised anti-religious displays and museums. Soon after the arrival of the communists, all the methods tried and tested in the Soviet Union were introduced in Latvia, albeit unsuccessfully: The churches remained crowded!    [left] View of anti-religious display.

Peoples CourtAt the same time, the judicial conscience of the nation suffered a heavy blow, when, with the creation of “People’s Courts”, men with no education in the law and often with no education at all, became judges. Caretakers, servants, cab drivers – of what quality could their judgments be? How many innocents did they condemn under the pressure of blind power and their own ignorance?  [right] One sitting of a “People’s Court”

The whole nightmarish year (1940-1941) was saturated and sealed with absurdities and ridiculousness. On some occasions, these absurdities surpassed all limits of reason.

The Jews in a demonstration were the first to demand land for farm workers. Jews never did any farming in Latvia. Jews also, when confiscating farm machinery, were the ones to instruct the new owners in its use. This was a burning insult hurled into the farmers’ faces. The results of such instructions by the inexperienced Jews, were as absurd and disastrous as anything in the Bolshevik system. The fields were harrowed before ploughing! The farm machinery broke and fell useless.  [above left] A Jewish Instructor advises a Latvian Farmer.

On July 19, 1940, newspapers reported that “six Hebrew citizens” wished to organise a piece of land on which to build a collective farm. Unrest among the farmers was calmed by an announcement in the press by a bigwig named Spure, that collective farms (kolkhozi) were not in the plans – “There shall be no kolkhozi!
What a consolation to the suspicious independent farmer, so that he would not hide seed and would not hesitate to plant his fields. However, the farmers did not believe the assurances and they were not mistaken in their skepticism.
Forgetting all their promises, in the spring of 1941, the Soviet power, with no hesitation, assembled the first collective farm. State-run farms (sovhozi) already existed. No effort was spared to degrade Latvian agriculture down to the level where Soviet agriculture was after 23 years of existence.

The most intense attempt to impoverish the land had begun. What remained was the physical destruction of the nation. The oppressive invaders made careful preparations.

What the Latvians Thought and Felt

The sequence of events could not be changed. Latvians rejected communism, closed ranks and united against oppression.
Latvian soldiers ordered by political instructors to march against their will, did so with military bearing, proudly and with dignity, in controlled disgust. With a nationalistic conscience, they kept aloof from everything communist.

[above left] One unit of Latvian soldiers marching at the International Youth Day demonstration, display faces that are deeply serious or sharply ironic. They convey something other than joy under Soviet power. [above right] Most painfully the nation’s misfortune and suffering was felt by Latvian youth. With grimly determined faces and with obvious reluctance, the youth marched, driven by the fanfares of May Day, deeply conscious of the nation’s misery.

Pioneers March

Pioneers at a demonstration. Their faces show feelings of being trapped and frightened

Pioneer ReportHerded into the strange Pioneer organisation, in a manner repugnant to the child’s soul, the little Latvians sullenly performed their assigned tasks. Communism was searching in that exact place – among the youngest – for suitable subjects. The poison of betrayal was injected into the hearts of the smallest.
The betrayal by way of a denunciation of his classmates contained in a report by one Pioneer [right].

Latvian Soldiers Protest

[above left]  A unit of Latvian soldiers marching to elections is ordered to pose for press photographers. The officers deliberately turned their backs to the cameras… Dissatisfaction and the spirit of resistance were manifested everywhere… [above right] Soldiers in one regiment expressed their resistance to communist absurdities and deliberate depravity in a daring sign: “We have no place to rest our heads.” This regiment had no permanent billets and was constantly moved from one place to another.

Voting ProtestThe people found thousands of ways to show their feelings. This was seen in election ballots covered with remarks or mutilated and in reports of committees being stuck to deal with damage to election ballots for the June 12, 1941 election. Disregarding the damage, these ballots were later used to round up the percentage of voters taking part. Everybody knew how difficult it was to express such, albeit, small protests.

The Latvian spirit remained unbroken throughout all the tribulations – the most horrible known to mankind – starting with the CHEKA and ending with the martyrs in exile or dead.

General K. Goppers

General K. Goppers in the prime of his life and then beyond the gates of human existence – in CHEKA prison.


This task was pursued most diligently from the very first days by the communist invaders. Those known opponents not arrested by the CHEKA were often deported.
The order of acting Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior, Vilis Lacis, to deport the Minister of Defense, General Janis Balodis, was of priority.


Deportation receiptHere is the receipt for “loading” O. Zakis and family, into a cattle car for deportation. The receipt shows, written as a numeral, that the family consists of “2” people, but the register shows three. This “order” indicates that the official of the Latvian SSR (Soviet Socialist Republic) State Security Commissariat Operative Group chief, Comrade E. Saulitis, could hardly read, write or add!   (Order issued to Saulitis).

On the Night of June 14, 1941

Latvian Family Home

Room from which a Latvian family was dragged and taken on an untraceable route of torture.

On this night, Latvians discovered fully the fate assigned to them. On this night, they recognised the real face of communism. Women, children, the aged – none was spared. On this night, the Soviets arrested the cream of Latvian families, delivered them to railroad stations and, in cross-barred cattle cars, shipped them to the Soviet Union. Thus, on this night alone, 14,693 of Latvia’s best sons and daughters were torn from the heart of the nation. With these horrible deportations, Latvians entered the worst stage of their tribulations and sufferings.

In an archive left by the Bolsheviks is a map showing plans for collection and loading (!) locations for Latvian deportees. The designations are a circle for a collection location and the triangle for a loading location. Cattle cars were provided for transport.

Bolshevik Deportation Map

Few photographs were taken to show the conditions during the deportations of Latvian’s. [below] Railway cars at Ogre Station.

Latvians Loaded onto Cattle-CarsRelatives of the unfortunate deportees, crowd the doors of one of the cars. CHEKISTS forbade relatives to give the deportees food, drinking water or warm clothing. The unfortunate people arrested had to endure many days and nights without food and water, over a journey of thousands of kilometers.
[below]    The door is closed!

Latvians locked in Cattle-Cars

The unfortunate deportees for the last few moments, gaze at a country many will never see again. The armed CHEKA guards take care of security. How could women, children and old people put up any resistance? What threat did the communists see in Latvian men, armed only with a nationalistic spirit and a determination to endure?

May Latvia Live Forever
Found by the rail-side, dropped out of a window, is a deportee’s description of their fate, handwritten in a printed book. Carved into an aluminum drinking cup is a deportee’s last wish:

                  “MAY LATVIA LIVE FOREVER!

To the Serbian Tundra

Resekne Bound for USSR

A long line of rail cars at Rezekne station en route to the Soviet Union

Destination MapDocuments left behind by the Bolsheviks reveal the destinations of the deported Latvians. The map on the right shows districts of intended locations. Numbers for each location are specified as numbers of railway cars, not people! A few, who at the last moment discovered the terrifying communist plans, escaped and went into hiding.

Latvian Home Guard and his Wife - before and after

An officer of the Home Guard with his wife [left]. After three weeks of hiding in the forests, they were scarcely recognisable. [right]


CHEKA Prison DoorEveryone who went through this door of the CHEKA, lived through the most terrible fear and the worst torture and suffering. For many Latvians unable to escape, who did not know how to hide from the Bolsheviks’ bloody clutches, life ended behind these doors.

“The most democratic constitution in the world”, the constitution of Stalin, “the Father of Nations and of Working People”, guaranteed that, “Latvia’s future would be happy and sunny.” Thousands of Latvians endured a bloody and pain-filled night, where death was the only deliverance.


Clara VeissIf the CHEKA intended to destroy anyone, it requested that material for that purpose be found; that is, fabricated. An order addressed to the NKVD Third Special Branch, to provide complete proven and compromising material on Clara Veiss. Deliberate malice on this occasion is especially conspicuous: Clara Veiss had departed from Latvia a year before, as shown in an NKVD document.

The Soviets could rely on their mercenaries. Special reports were ordered for the gathering of incriminating information on people under suspicion. The CHEKA kept a special file on each one of them. If one institution did not have the needed material, they were borrowed from another.
The report [below left] of writer Janis Niedra, to the State Security Commissar, Comrade S. Sustin. [below right] Order from Latvian Interior Commissariat for the gathering of incriminating material.

Reports and Orders


arrest and search reportParticulars and directions on persons to be watched, searched or arrested, were delivered to the CHEKA by a carefully organised network of informers, spies and agents. However, the most valuable service came from trustworthy men, planted in offices and working places.
[left] The witnesses of the methods of the communist rule. Statements of arrests and searches. A note identifies the searchers.

A few of these, responsible for the suffering of Latvians. [below left] One is a Jew, Cipe Gutmanis, a thief and a robber, who served 3.5 years in prison for his crimes. He was the Bolshevik officer in the Dwelling Allocation Office. Another was Ernests Rozkalns, [below right], a specialist in break-and-enter and theft. He had 16 convictions. He was the manager of commercial establishments during the communists’ rule.

Mug Shots

The Cheka

The Cheka

Cheka Cells

Cheka cells
[left]  Corridor and Cells in Cheka Prison. [right] Solitary cell used for torture. In this solitary confinement cell, it is not possible to stretch or lie down. It was used to exhaust prisoners and to reduce endurance and resistance during interrogations.

[below left]  One of the CHEKA’s cells. At night time suddenly shouts were heard: “Get up!” CHEKISTS called out the names of prisoners. They were ordered to follow along endless corridors to a special room. [below right] The yard of the CHEKA prison, where prisoners sometimes were taken for walks.

Cheka Beds

Cheka Execution RoomThis was the Execution Room

Here everything was provided for the killers: wooden padding on the walls to protect the walls from bullets. The door was covered with soft material to deaden the sound of the gunshots. The floor was concrete to facilitate the rinsing away of the victims’ blood.
Those unfortunates who entered this room left as corpses.

Execution Chamber - internal

View into the Execution Chamber

Execution DrainThe walls were covered with special coverings to prevent them being splattered with the blood of the victims. The corner of the cell had a drain for blood. After each execution, the cell was hosed down in preparation for the next killing. In one groove near the drain, 240 bullets were found. How many had been washed down the drain?
[right]  Drain in the corner of the Execution Cells.

The Killers and Their Victims

Victims 1

[below] The Killers: Sustins, Noviks, and Citrons – all three Jews.

Killer Jews

Jewess Torturer

[above left]  Interior NKVD, later, State Security Commissar, S. Sustins.
[above center]  Interior Commissar, A. Noviks, Sustins’ successor.
[above right]  Moses Citrons, CHEKA Director in Daugavpils. His salary was 900 rubles per month – three times the going rate for doctors. Whom did he cure?

[right]  Jewess hired by the CHEKA as a torturer.

Victim vivisection

One of the victims of the communists, murdered with a Jewish “Schechert” or butcher’s cut to the throat

Their Blood Cries From Heaven

Blood Tarps 1

[above left]  Padding removed from the walls of the CHEKA prison was covered with the blood of the tortured victims. During the night, the corpses of those shot were taken outside Riga for secret burial.  [above right] In the CHEKA prison courtyard, they found blood soaked tarpaulins used to wrap the victims on their final journey.

Student - Bruno Rungainis

[left]  Student, Bruno Rungainis, one of the few who managed to escape the CHEKA death grip. What tales could the innumerable victims tell who are now silenced for eternity?
[right  The statement of Bruno Rungainis regarding torture at the hands of the CHEKA.

Confession - Ginsburg

The hideous testimony of the illiterate Jew Ginsburg regarding nail-pulling torture in Daugavpils Prison.

The Ground Opened Up!

Baltezers Cottage

A silent cottage in Baltezers. There, in locked trucks, armed CHEKISTS transported dozens of Latvian patriots. Beyond the fence of this cottage, their journey of agony ended! Not far from the cottage among trees full of the sap of life was the freshly dug ground.

Latvians Welcome their German LiberatorsFreed from the bloody yoke, in July, 1941, when the German armies drove out the Soviet communists, the Latvian ground began to reveal its dreadful secrets… It revealed much of what the communists had tried to hide behind barred windows, barbed wire fences, in prison basements and in their own secretive brains. Cris-crossed, thrown into a mass grave in the garden of Baltezers cottage lay some of the prisoners who had been shot. The pit yielded more corpses, one after another.  [Right: Latvians welcome the German Army as Liberators and celebrated with refreshments]

Video footage [0:38] Wehrmacht enters Riga and Latvians rejoice
and march, flying both Latvian and German flags together.


Continue reading

THE ENIGMA OF HITLER: A Glimpse into the Extraordinarily Unique Mind, Character and Insight of Adolf Hitler, by One Who Knew Him

Adolf Hitler was the most prominent figure of the 20th century, whose public character, however falsely portrayed, continues to be propelled into the 21st century. People of all ages and from all corners of the world, believe they know who he was, what he stood for and what his interests were, right down to daily routines and alleged habits… but how could anyone truly know anything about him, if they were not at least in observance of him?

Leon Degrelle, 1944, shadowJournalist, Belgian politician and later, SS-Obersturmbannführer of the 5th Walloon contingent, Leon Degrelle, was one such individual, who did indeed know Adolf Hitler and had spent much time to develop, what he described as, a “Thinking Bond” with the German Chancellor. (right: Leon Degrelle with Adolf Hitler, 1944)

This piece, The Enigma of Hitler, is from the second volume of Degrelle’s unfinished and provisionally titled, ‘The Hitler Century’ which is a series on Hitler’s life and legacy. It gives the reader a side of Adolf Hitler that most people don’t know of, covering; his history, his beginnings, interests and almost any other aspect one could ponder.

The Enigma of Hitler

By Leon Degrelle

“Hitler – you knew him – what was he like?” I have been asked that question a thousand
times since 1945, and nothing is more difficult to answer.
Approximately two hundred thousand books have dealt with the Second World War and with its central figure, Adolf Hitler. But has the real Hitler been discovered by any of them? “The enigma of Hitler is beyond all human comprehension,” the left-wing German weekly Die Zeit once put it.
Salvador Dali, art’s unique genius, sought to penetrate the mystery in one of his most intensely dramatic paintings. Towering mountain landscapes all but fill the canvas, leaving only a few luminous meters of seashore dotted with delicately miniaturized human figures: the last witness to a dying peace. A huge telephone receiver dripping tears of blood hangs from the branch of a dead tree; and here and there hang umbrellas and bats whose portent is visibly the same. As Dali tells it, “Chamberlain’s umbrella appeared in this painting in a sinister light, made evident by the bat, and it struck me when I painted it as a thing of enormous anguish.”
He then confided: “I felt this painting to be deeply prophetic. But I confess that I haven’t yet figured out the Hitler enigma either. He attracted me only as an object of my mad imaginings and because I saw him as a man uniquely capable of turning things completely upside down.”
What a lesson in humility for the braying critics who have rushed into print since 1945 with their thousands of “definitive” books, most of them scornful, about this man who so troubled the introspective Dali that forty years later he still felt anguished and uncertain in the presence of his own hallucinatory painting. Apart from Dali, who else has ever tried to present an objective portrayal of this extraordinary man whom Dali labeled the most explosive figure in human history?
The Enigma of Hitler, shadow

Salvador Dali – The Enigma of Hitler

Like Pavlov’s Bell

The mountains of Hitler books based on blind hatred and ignorance do little to describe or explain the most powerful man the world has ever seen. How, I ponder, do these thousands of disparate portraits of Hitler in any way resemble the man I knew? The Hitler seated beside me, standing up, talking, listening. It has become impossible to explain to people fed fantastic tales for decades that what they have read or heard on television just does not correspond to the truth.

People have come to accept fiction, repeated a thousand times over, as reality. Yet they have never seen Hitler, never spoken to him, never heard a word from his mouth. The very name of Hitler immediately conjures up a grimacing devil, the fount of all of one’s negative emotions. Like Pavlov’s bell, the mention of Hitler is meant to dispense with substance and reality. In time, however, history will demand more than these summary judgements.

Strangely Attractive

Hitler is always present before my eyes: as a man of peace in 1936, as a man of war in 1944. It is not possible to have been a personal witness to the life of such an extraordinary man without being marked by it forever. Not a day goes by but Hitler rises again in my memory, not as a man long dead, but as a real being who paces his office floor, seats himself in his chair, pokes the burning logs in the fireplace.
Adolf Blue EyesThe first thing anyone noticed when he came into view was his small mustache. Countless times he had been advised to shave it off, but he always refused: people were used to him the way he was. He was not tall – no more than was Napoleon or Alexander the Great. Hitler had deep blue eyes that many found bewitching, although I did not find them so. Nor did I detect the electric current his hands were said to give off. I gripped them quite a few times and was never struck by his lightning.

His face showed emotion or indifference according to the passion or apathy of the moment. At times he was as though benumbed, saying not a word, while his jaws moved in the meanwhile as if they were grinding an obstacle to smithereens in the void. Then he would come suddenly alive and launch into a speech directed at you alone, as though he were addressing a crowd of hundreds of thousands at Berlin’s Tempelhof airfield. Then he became as if transfigured. Even his complexion, otherwise dull, lit up as he spoke. And at such times, to be sure, Hitler was strangely attractive and as if possessed of magic powers.

Exceptional Vigor

Anything that might have seemed too solemn in his remarks, he quickly tempered with a touch of humor. The picturesque world, the biting phrase were at his command. In a flash he would paint a word-picture that brought a smile, or come up with an unexpected and disarming comparison. He could be harsh and even implacable in his judgments and yet almost at the same time be surprisingly conciliatory, sensitive and warm.
Hitler and girls, shadow
After 1945 Hitler was accused of every cruelty, but it was not in his nature to be cruel. He loved children. It was an entirely natural thing for him to stop his car and share his food with young cyclists along the road. Once he gave his raincoat to a derelict plodding in the rain. At midnight he would interrupt his work and prepare the food for his dog Blondi. He could not bear to eat meat, because it meant the death of a living creature. He refused to have so much as a rabbit or a trout sacrificed to provide his food. He would allow only eggs on his table, because egg-laying meant that the hen had been spared rather than killed.

Hitler’s eating habits were a constant source of amazement to me. How could someone on such a rigorous schedule, who had taken part in tens of thousands of exhausting mass meetings from which he emerged bathed with sweat, often losing two to four pounds in the process; who slept only three to four hours a night; and who, from 1940 to 1945, carried the whole world on his shoulders while ruling over 380 million Europeans: how, I wondered, could he physically survive on just a boiled egg, a few tomatoes, two or three pancakes, and a plate of noodles? But he actually gained weight!

Hitler and stray dog, shadowHe drank only water. He did not smoke and would not tolerate smoking in his presence. At one or two o’clock in the morning he would still be talking, untroubled, close to his fireplace, lively, often amusing. He never showed any sign of weariness. Dead tired his audience might be, but not Hitler.

He was depicted as a tired old man. Nothing was further from the truth. In September 1944, when he was reported to be fairly doddering, I spent a week with him. His mental and physical vigor were still exceptional. The attempt made on his life on July 20th had, if anything, recharged him. He took tea in his quarters as tranquilly as if we had been in his small private apartment at the chancellery before the war, or enjoying the view of snow and bright blue sky through his great bay window at Berchtesgaden.

Iron Self-Control

At the very end of his life, to be sure, his back had become bent, but his mind remained as clear as a flash of lightening. The testament he dictated with extraordinary composure on the eve of his death, at three in the morning of April 29, 1945, provides us a lasting testimony. Napoleon at Fontainebleau was not without his moments of panic before his abdication. Hitler simply shook hands with his associates in silence, breakfasted as on any other day, then went to his death as if he were going on a stroll. When has history ever witnessed so enormous a tragedy brought to its end with such iron self-control?
Hitler’s most notable characteristic was ever his simplicity. The most complex of problems resolved itself in his mind into a few basic principles. His actions were geared to ideas and decisions that could be understood by anyone. The laborer from Essen, the isolated farmer, the Ruhr industrialist, and the university professor could all easily follow his line of thought. The very clarity of his reasoning made everything obvious.

His behavior and his lifestyle never changed even when he became the ruler of Germany. He dressed and lived frugally. During his early days in Munich, he spent no more than a mark per day for food. At no stage in his life did he spend anything on himself. Throughout his thirteen years in the chancellery he never carried a wallet or ever had money of his own.

Intellectual Curiosity

Hitler reading, shadowHitler was self-taught and made no attempt to hide the fact. The smug conceit of intellectuals, their shiny ideas packaged like so many flashlight batteries, irritated him at times. His own knowledge he had acquired through selective and unremitting study, and he knew far more than thousands of diploma-decorated academics.
I don’t think anyone ever read as much as he did. He normally read one book every day, always first reading the conclusion and the index in order to gauge the work’s interest for him. He had the power to extract the essence of each book and then store it in his computer-like mind. I have heard him talk about complicated scientific books with faultless precision, even at the height of the war.
His intellectual curiosity was limitless. He was readily familiar with the writings of the most diverse authors, and nothing was too complex for his comprehension. He had a deep knowledge and understanding of Buddha, Confucius and Jesus Christ, as well as Luther, Calvin, and Savonarola; of literary giants such as Dante, Schiller, Shakespeare and Goethe; and of analytical writers such as Renan and Gobineau, Chamberlain and Sorel.
He had trained himself in philosophy by studying Aristotle and Plato. He could quote entire paragraphs of Schopenhauer from memory, and for a long time carried a pocket edition of Schopenhauer with him. Nietzsche taught him much about the willpower.
His thirst for knowledge was unquenchable. He spent hundreds of hours studying the works of Tacitus and Mommsen, military strategists such as Clausewitz, and empire builders such as Bismarck. Nothing escaped him: world history or the history of civilizations, the study of the Bible and the Talmud, Thomistic philosophy and all the master-pieces of Homer, Sophocles, Horace, Ovid, Titus Livius and Cicero. He knew Julian the Apostate as if he had been his contemporary.
His knowledge also extended to mechanics. He knew how engines worked; he understood the ballistics of various weapons; and he astonished the best medical scientists with his knowledge of medicine and biology.

Hitler volkswagenThe universality of Hitler’s knowledge may surprise or displease those unaware of it, but it is nonetheless a historical fact: Hitler was one of the most cultivated men of this century. Many times more so than Churchill, an intellectual mediocrity; or than Pierre Laval, with his mere cursory knowledge of history; or than Roosevelt; or Eisenhower, who never got beyond detective novels.

Artist and Architect

Fortress Utopia

Fortress Utopia – A. Hitler, 1904

Even during his earliest years, Hitler was different than other children. He had an inner strength and was guided by his spirit and his instincts.

He could draw skillfully when he was only eleven years old. His sketches made at that age show a remarkable firmness and liveliness.
His first paintings and watercolors, created at age 15, are full of poetry and sensitivity. One of his most striking early works, “Fortress Utopia,” also shows him to have been an artist of rare imagination. His artistic orientation took many forms. He wrote poetry from the time he was a lad. He dictated a complete play to his sister Paula who was amazed at his presumption. At the age of 16, in Vienna, he launched into the creation of an opera. He even designed the stage settings, as well as all the costumes; and, of cours e, the characters were Wagnerian heroes.
More than just an artist, Hitler was above all an architect. Hundreds of his works were notable as much for the architecture as for the painting. From memory alone he could reproduce in every detail the onion dome of a church or the intricate curves of wrought iron. Indeed, it was to fulfill his dream of becoming an architect that Hitler went to Vienna at the beginning of the century.

ArhitectureWhen one sees the hundreds of paintings, sketches and drawings he created at the time, which reveal his mastery of three dimensional figures, it is astounding that his examiners at the Fine Arts Academy failed him in two successive examinations. German historian Werner Maser, no friend of Hitler, castigated these examiners: “All of his works revealed extraordinary architectural gifts and knowledge. The builder of the Third Reich gives the former Fine Arts Academy of Vienna cause for shame.”

Hitlers architectual art

Humble Origins

Stone Escutcheon

The Swastika displayed at the Benedictine Monastery where Hitler was an Alter Boy.

Impressed by the beauty of the church in a Benedictine monastery where he was part of the choir and served as an altar boy, Hitler dreamt fleetingly of becoming a Benedictine monk. And it was at that time, too, interestingly enough, that whenever he attended mass, he always had to pass beneath the first swastika he had ever seen: it was graven in the stone escutcheon of the abbey portal.

Hitler’s father, a customs officer, hoped the boy would follow in his footsteps and become a civil servant. His tutor encouraged him to become a monk. Instead the young Hitler went, or rather he fled, to Vienna. And there, thwarted in his artistic aspirations by the bureaucratic mediocraties of academia, he turned to isolation and meditation. Lost in the great capital of Austria-Hungary, he searched for his destiny.

Hitlers MotherDuring the first thirty years of Hitler’s life, the date April 20, 1889, meant nothing to anyone. He was born on that day in Branau, a small town in the Inn valley. During his exile in Vienna, he often thought of his modest home, and particularly of his mother. When she fell ill, he returned home from Vienna to look after her. For weeks he nursed her, did all the household chores, and supported her as the most loving of sons. When she finally died, on Christmas eve, his pain was immense. Wracked with grief, he buried his mother in the little country cemetery: “I have never seen anyone so prostrate with grief,” said his mother’s doctor, who happened to be Jewish.

In his room, Hitler always displayed an old photograph of his mother. The memory of the mother he loved was with him until the day he died. Before leaving this earth, on April 30, 1945, he placed his mother’s photograph in front of him. She had blue eyes like his and a similar face. Her maternal intuition told her that her son was different from other children. She acted almost as if she knew her son’s destiny. When she died, she felt anguished by the immense mystery surrounding her son.

Corporal HitlerThroughout the years of his youth, Hitler lived the life of a virtual recluse. His greatest wish was to withdraw from the world. At heart a loner, he wandered about, ate meager meals, but devoured the books of three public libraries. He abstained from conversations and had few friends. It is almost impossible to imagine another such destiny where a man started with so little and reached such heights. Alexander the Great was the son of a king. Napoleon, from a well-to-do family, was a general at twenty-four. Fifteen years after Vienna, Hitler would still be an unknown corporal. Thousands of others had a thousand times more opportunity to leave their mark on the world.

Young HitlerHitler was not much concerned with his private life. In Vienna he had lived in shabby, cramped lodgings. But for all that he rented a piano that took up half his room, and concentrated on composing his opera. He lived on bread, milk, and vegetable soup. His poverty was real. He did not even own an over-coat. He shoveled streets on snowy days. He carried luggage at the railway station. He spent many weeks in shelters for the homeless. But he never stopped painting or reading.

Despite his dire poverty, Hitler somehow managed to maintain a clean appearance. Landlords and landladies in Vienna and Munich all remembered him for his civility and pleasant disposition. His behavior was impeccable. His room was always spotless, his meager belongings meticulously arranged, and his clothes neatly hung or folded. He washed and ironed his own clothes, something which in those days few men did. He needed almost nothing to survive, and money from the sale of a few paintings was sufficient to provide for all his needs.

Summing Things Up

Hitler had not yet focused on politics, but without his rightly knowing, that was the career to which he was most strongly called. Politics would ultimately blend with his passion for art. People, the masses, would be the clay the sculptor shapes into an immortal form. The human clay would become for him a beautiful work of art like one of Myron’s marble sculptures, a Hans Makart painting, or Wagner’s Ring Trilogy.
His love of music, art and architecture had not removed him from the political life and social concerns of Vienna. In order to survive, he worked as a common laborer side by side with other workers. He was a silent spectator, but nothing escaped him: not the vanity and egoism of the bourgeoisie, not the moral and material misery of the people, nor yet the hundreds of thousands of workers who surged down the wide avenues of Vienna with anger in their hearts.
He had also been taken aback by the growing presence in Vienna of bearded Jews wearing caftans, a sight unknown in Linz. “How can they be Germans?” he asked himself. He read the statistics: in 1860 there were sixty-nine Jewish families in Vienna; forty years later there were two hundred thousand. They were everywhere. He observed their invasion of the universities and the legal and medical professions, and their takeover of the newspapers.
Hitler was exposed to the passionate reactions of the workers to this influx, but the workers were not alone in their unhappiness. There were many prominent persons in Austria and Hungary who did not hide their resentment at what they believed was an alien invasion of their country. The mayor of Vienna, a Christian-Democrat and a powerful orator, was eagerly listened to by Hitler.
Hitler was also concerned with the fate of the eight million Austrian Germans kept apart from Germany, and thus deprived of their rightful German nationhood. He saw Emperor Franz Josef as a bitter and petty old man unable to cope with the problems of the day and the aspirations of the future.
Quietly, the young Hitler was summing things up in his mind.
First: Austrians were part of Germany, the common fatherland.
Second: The Jews were aliens within the German community.
Third: Patriotism was only valid if it was shared by all classes. The common people with whom Hitler had shared grief and humiliation were just as much a part of the fatherland as the millionaires of high society.
Fourth: Class war would sooner or later condemn both workers and bosses to ruin in any
country. No country could survive class war; only cooperation between workers and bosses can benefit the country. Workers must be respected and live with decency and honor. Creativity must never be stifled.

When Hitler later said that he had formed his social and political doctrine in Vienna, he told the truth. Ten years later his observations made in Vienna would become the order of the day. Thus Hitler was to live for several years in the crowded city of Vienna as a virtual outcast, yet quietly observing everything around him. His strength came from within. He did not rely on anyone to do his thinking for him. Exceptional human beings always feel lonely amid the vast human throng. Hitler saw his solitude as a wonderful opportunity to meditate and not to be submerged in a mindless sea. In order not to be lost in the wastes of a sterile desert, a strong soul seeks refuge within himself. Hitler was such a soul.


Lightning and the Word

The lightning in Hitler’s life would come from the Word.
All his artistic talent would be channeled into his mastery of communication and eloquence. Hitler would never conceive of popular conquests without the power of the Word. He would enchant and be enchanted by it. He would find total fulfillment when the magic of his words inspired the hearts and minds of the masses with whom he communed. He would feel reborn each time he conveyed with mystical beauty the knowledge he had acquired in his lifetime.

Hitler’s incantory eloquence will remain, for a very long time, a vast field of study for the psychoanalyst. The power of Hitler’s word is the key. Without it, there would never have been a Hitler era.

Transcendent Faith

Hitler and the ChurchDid Hitler believe in God? He believed deeply in God. He called God the Almighty, master of all that is known and unknown. Propagandists portrayed Hitler as an atheist. He was not. He had contempt for hypocritical and materialistic clerics, but he was not alone in that. He believed in the necessity of standards and theological dogmas, without which, he repeatedly said, the great institution of the Christian church would collapse. These dogmas clashed with his intelligence, but he also recognized that it was hard for the human mind to encompass all the problems of creation, its limitless scope and breathtaking beauty. He acknowledged that every human being has spiritual needs. The song of the nightingale, the pattern and color of a flower, continually brought him back to the great problems of creation. No one in the world has spoken to me so eloquently about the existence of God. He held this view not because he was brought up as a Christian, but because his analytical mind bound him to the concept of God. Hitler’s faith transcended formulas and contingencies. God was for him the basis of everything, the ordainer of all things, of his destiny and that of all others.

popular hitler

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic

The BIRTH OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: Part 1 – Christian Ramallah, King David Hotel & Guerilla Warfare Spreads From Europe to the Orient

Oust the B’rith-ish, Enter the US of Israel,
Good-bye Roosevelt & Declare the ‘State’
Subscribe to receive notifications of future publishing  red-arrow


Source: Wikipedia

Ramallah, originally a village founded by Ghassanid Christians in the 1500’s, is today a Palestinian city in the central West Bank, 10 km north of Jerusalem. It serves as the defacto administrative capital of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). Ramallah was historically a Christian town, but today Muslims form the majority of the population, with Christians still making up a significant minority.

The city grew dramatically in the 17th and 18th centuries as an agricultural village, attracting more (predominately Christian) residents from around Palestine. In 1700, Yacoub Elias was the first Ramallah native to be ordained by the Greek Orthodox Church of Jerusalem. In the early 19th century, the first Greek Melkite Orthodox Christian church was built and the Church of Transfiguration was built in the 1850’s. That same decade, the Latin Church established its presence, becoming the 2nd largest Christian denomination. The Catholic Church established the St. Joseph’s Girl’s School and the Al-Ahliyyah College, run by Rosary Sisters. Later, with the influx of Muslim and Christian refugees, new mosques and churches were built, with both Muslim and Christian Palestinians, peacefully cohabiting together.

In 1836, American biblical scholar Edward Robinson visited the area, noting that the inhabitants were Christian “of the Greek rite.” The village belonged to the Haram al-Sharif (the Temple Mount), Jerusalem, to which it paid an annual tax of 350 Mids of grain.
In 1883, the Palestine Exploration Fund’s Survey of Western Palestine described Ramallah as;

“A large Christian village, of well-built stone houses, standing on a high ridge, with a view on the west extending to the sea. It stands amongst gardens and olive-yards, and has three springs to the south and one on the west; on the north there are three more, within a mile from the village. On the east there is a well. There are rock-cut tombs to the north-east with well-cut entrances, but completely blocked with rubbish. In the village is a Greek church, and on the east a Latin convent and a Protestant schoolhouse, all modern buildings. The village lands are Wakuf, or ecclesiastical property, belonging to the Haram of Jerusalem. About a quarter of the inhabitants are Roman Catholics, the rest Orthodox Greeks.”


Ramallah was declared a modern city in 1908 and had an elected municipality as well as partnership projects with the adjacent town of al-Bireh.

Then things changed… DRAMATICALLY!

balfour-rothschildThe British Army occupied Ramallah in December 1917, one month after the Balfour Declaration, where Lord Arthur Balfour, on behalf of the Foreign Office of the British Government, declared to Lord Walter Rothschild, that their illegitimate, interloping third party authority, had promised Palestine to the Jews… and it remained under British rule until 1948.

The 1936–39 revolt was a nationalist uprising by Palestinians in Mandatory Palestine, against the then 19 year British occupation and exponential Jewish immigration since WWI. It initially began as a general strike, demanding the end to Jewish immigration and the establishment of Palestinian Independence, pursuant to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations: The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration” and that the Mandate would only apply until the communities could stand alone, which was incorporated into the Mandate.

british-bomb-ramallah-1938As a center of activities against the occupation and Jewish immigration, the British R.A.F ultimately attacked Ramallah in a controlled aerial bombing campaign, in 1938 – many were killed and injured – while over 3 years of the revolt and all of Palestine in general, tens of thousands of Palestinians lost their lives.

In this short compilation of speeches [2:42], Hitler highlights the hypocrisy of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s demands regarding which nations he claims should be left to their own independence; including nations such as Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Finland and Latvia, already invaded and occupied by US’ allies, the Jewish Bolsheviks – who incidentally had already usurped and Revolutionised Russia (both facilitated by Jewish finance), along with Palestine, occupied by the British and Jewish revolutionaries.

The 1936-1939 Revolt spurred the British to host the Arab-Zionist London Conference, seeking to find agreement in governance and to end the British Mandate in Palestine – however, it ended in failure.
In response to this failure, Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was only elected in 1937, introduced the 1939 White Paper, which was approved by the House of Commons (Lower House) May 23, 1939it served as a principle governing policy until 1947.
The Paper was plain in stating that; the framers of the Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was embodied could not have intended that Palestine should be converted into a Jewish State against the will of the Arab population of the country.

Chamberlain’s Paper called for the then 450,000 Jewish immigrants already in Palestine – the majority who had only settled since WWI – to be restricted to only 75,000 further immigrants over the next 5 years – to maintain demographic percentages – after which, Jewish immigration to Palestine would be for Arab Authorities to decide (Section II).
It also called for the establishment of an Independent Palestinian State within 10 years, while rejecting the idea of creating a Jewish State and, also rejecting the idea of partitioning Palestine – as recommended by the Peel Commission.
Restrictions were put on the rights of Jews to buy land from Arabs (Section III), as a safeguard for Arab cultivators to maintain their existing standard of life and, so a considerable landless Arab population was not created. Further, it promised that ONLY with Palestinian support would Britain allow a Jewish State.


Jewish demonstrations against the White Paper in Jerusalem

This so greatly upset the Jews, that in response, the propaganda of Persecution of Jews in Germany escalated, as purported cause for Palestinians to accommodate Jewish demands to their own land… all while Jewish Leaders in Western lands hindered Jewish immigration to other nations. If they weren’t prepared to go to Palestine, they weren’t fit for anywhere… Palestine only!

balfour-declarationDuring the debates on the Paper in May 1939 (before the ‘Official’ outbreak of WWII in September, 1939), the Jewish Liberal MP, James Rothschild, stated that; for the majority of the Jews who go to Palestine it is a question of migration or of physical extinction.”

Winston Churchill vehemently opposed the Paper and, for what is said to be one of his greatest parliamentary speeches of his career, he sought a lunch meeting that very same day with his long time WWI friend, 2nd time President of the World Zionist Organisation, Dr. Chaim Weizmann (later 1st President of Israel) and Churchill’s Scientific Advisor, Frederick Lindemann (Architect of the Dehousing Paper – the “Extermination Policy” to slaughter 25 million German civilians), for their approval of his speech, before oration.

Churchill’s speech pressed upon the White Paper being contradictory to the character and so-called “British” promise of the Balfour Declaration – which was actually authored by the Jewish, First Lord of the Admiralty, Leopold Amery (aka, Mauritz Amery). He ignored the fact that [allegedly] British politicians, being all so balanced in their international diplomatic dealings – or rather playing both sides – had also made a similar promise to the Arabs, via the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, in exchange to help defeat the Ottoman Empire during WWI – essentially to balkanise the region – even sending Thomas E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) to establish the Arab Legion and incite the 1916 Revolt. The intentional reneging of the Arab promise, was exposed by the Secret Sykes-Picot Agreement.
Churchill also ignored that the idolised Balfour Declaration did not propose to make Palestinians a threatened minority in their own nation, only promised the Jews a ‘Homeland’ – not a Sovereign Jewish State – as well as ignoring the fact that the Balfour Letter was neither a Treaty or a Bill that passed through the House’ of Commons or Lords… it was simply just a ‘Declaration’ agreed to by Cabinet Members amongst themselves – which was initially absent of the full force of U.K. Law, especially in international matters… until the language of the Declaration was incorporated into the Mandate.

The Arab Higher Committee argued that the independence of a future Palestinian Government would prove to be illusory, as the Jews would prevent its functioning by withholding participation and compliance. This predictive assessment has since proven to be true, in regard to all enactments and authoritative Resolutions or Legislation, which have stood in opposition to policies, territorial aims and actions of Jews and, the later State of Israel.


London, 1933, at the brink of International Jewry’s world-wide Economic Warfare against Germany and their Persecution Propaganda, which was denounced by German-Jews

hitler-and-chamberlain-shadowChamberlain, the only All-lied leader to ever consider or negotiate any of Hitler’s Peace Proposals (at least on the issue of ethnic Germans annexed to the post-WWI borders of the new Czechoslovakia, by the Versialles Dictat), was, after months of Appeasement Defamation from his own colleagues, railroaded in Parliament on May 7, 1940.
After 2 days of Parliamentary Debates, in what can be better described as an internal diplomatic political coup, Neville Chamberlain stepped down as Prime Minister. The war-mongering Winston Churchill, who was not duly elected by the British people, was immediately appointed as the British [war-time] Prime Minister – which was announced the following day.
That following day, May 10, 1940, coincidentally, just happened to be the day the Phony War ended and British Blenheim Bombers of the No. 15 Squadron bombed the Rotterdam airport in Holland. Later that day, bombers from the British 110 Squadron bombed German vessels near the Hague and continued against Germany’s legally contracted oil interests… the day when WWII actually began.
The Persecution Propaganda also went into overdrive, as another excuse for persistent war and an alternate Jewish Homeland in Palestine.



Illegal immigrants and “Survivors” wielding German Karabiner 98k rifles, now trained members of The Irgun

During and after WWII, in defiance of the restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine set out by the White Paper, underground Jewish Terrorist organisations such as – but not limited to – the Irgun, Haganah, Betar, Jewish Brigade, the Palmach and the most formidable Lehi (better-known as The Stern Gang; alligned to Stalin’s Bolshevism), Mossad LeAliya-Bet and Bricha, continued to smuggle Jewish immigrant Guerilla’s into Palestine and, in defiance of a later Arms Embargo imposed by the British, U.S. and the U.N., found other avenues to smuggle Polish, French, stolen Czechoslovakian shipments of arms (originally German army issue, mostly “captured” by the Jewish Bolsheviks) meant for Syria and the Arab Liberation Army (some 200 German MG-34 machine guns, 4,500 German P-18 rifles and 50,400,000 rounds of ammunition – a vast shipment the Yishuv were somehow privy to), stolen British arms, stolen U.S. arms and ultimately, gifted German arms.


Terrorist organisations, now turned IDF, women recruits train with German Karabiner 98k rifles, 1954.

With Jewish volunteers, Partisans, [alleged] ‘Holocaust Survivors’, [U.S. funded] European DP’s and the Jewish Revolutionaries who swarmed central Europe, now flooding Palestine, the underground terrorist organisations facilitated paramilitary tactical training for the illegal immigrant Guerilla’s – that is, those who had by-passed their [US and UNRRA funded] paramilitary training at the DP Camps, in Europe. This was overseen by the Jewish Agency (originally the Palestine Office of the WZO), which also coordinated some of the Aliyah Bet (Hebrew code-name given to illegal immigrants, by Jews) for more than 150,000 illegal immigrants (later 3 million), organising a total of 141 smuggling operations, on 116 different ships.


SS Patria sinking in the Haifa Port

Many ships were intercepted and illegals were taken to British Concentration Camps in Cyprus, where many escapes were organised to smuggle Jewish Guerilla’s out via tunnel systems, who were then put on small boats in the middle of the night, to Palestine.
One of the ship intercepts transferred 1,800 illegal Jewish immigrants to the SS Patria for deportation to the Mauritius Camp. The Haganah terrorists bombed and sank the exiting ship in the Haifa Harbour, killing 267 people (217 Jews – 50 British) and injuring 172 – many others unaccounted for were claimed to have swam to shore, self-migrated and were harboured by other illegals already in Palestine, with the help of the Irgun. The remaining illegal Jewish immigrants were sent to the British Atlit Concentration Camp in Palestine, but out of ‘Official Sympathy’, were permitted to enter Palestine a few months later, instead of deportation to Cyprus. Thus, the terrorist bombing was a success in the push for more illegal immigrant Jews in Palestine and bringing continued international political attention to the region.

“We have always been ready to sacrifice a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership. This was the plan of the Jews who instigated WW II. Some Jews were sacrificed so that the persecution propaganda could continue. It is a small price and there is nothing wrong with that.”
∼ Harold Rosenthal, 1976 – The Rosenthal Document – The Hidden Tyranny.


Entrance to the Atlit Camp

Upon entry to the Atlit camp – which was surrounded by barbed wire and watch-towers; the men were sent to one side, women to the other, they were sprayed with DDT (for treatment against Typhus ridden lice brought from war-torn Europe), then ordered to undress and enter the showers – as was international protocol, pursuant to the 1929 Geneva ConventionsArticle 13, for prisoners in camps.

            * History Should Not Be Judged By Double Standards! *  

 These Terrorist Organisations eventually amalgamated into the IDF (Israeli Defense Force), absorbing predominantly Haganah, Palmach, Lehi and Irgun terrorists – who continue the same operations today – however, now with an officially recognised international status and advanced weaponry.


Illegal immigrant Guerilla’s, “Holocaust Survivors” and DP’s in training as new members of the Haganah Terrorist Organisation, at one of the Jewish Agency’s transitional “Absorption Centers” in Palestine

After the war, with Jewish Terrorist elements disseminating throughout Palestine, hostilities increased toward both Christian and Muslim Arab natives and British Forces. Wide spread terrorist attacks and massacres became more prevalent, including (but certainly not limited to) the Baldat al-Shaikh Massacre, the Yehida Massacre, the British CID Headquarters bombing, the Deir Yassin Massacre, the British Officers Club Bombing & Raid, the Haifa Oil Refinery Massacre, the Christian Semiramis Hotel Bombing, the Al Khisas Massacre, the Acre Prison Break, the Dahmash Mosque Massacre, the Naser al-Din Massacre, the RAF Qastina Air Force Base attack and many, many more.
In the same manner as Jewish Guerilla’s via Stalin’s Order #0428, the Jewish Brigade and the German-speaking Jews of the S.I.G. (Special Interrogation Group) carried out atrocity and other operations in British and German uniforms, most of these attacks were carried out by Jewish terrorists who were, self-admittedly, disguised in either Arab attire, or British uniforms.

Self-defined ‘Terrorist Group’ the Lehi, along with Haganah, Irgun and others, had avowed its main aim was to evict the British authorities from Palestine by resort to force, allowing unrestricted immigration of Jews and the formation of a Jewish State – a “new totalitarian Hebrew republic.”

The most infamous Terrorist Attack recognised by western nations, is the 1946 Bombing of the King David Hotel… the British administrative headquarters for Palestine.


British Mandate Administrative Headquarters, The King David Hotel – Before and After the Irgun Bombing

King David Hotel Bombing

The King David Hotel Bombing was a terrorist attack officially carried out by the Irgun, July 22, 1946, on the British Administrative Headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, accommodating the central offices for the British Mandatory authorities; principally the Secretariat of the Government, the Headquarters of the British Armed Forces for Palestine and Transjordan and, a branch of the Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the British Police.


Wanted Terrorist, Haganah Chief of General Headquarters, Moshe Sneh, (also head of the Jewish Agency’s illegal immigration and later elected Member to the first Knesset in 1949), sent to Wanted Terrorist, former head of the Polish Betar and Commander of the Irgun, Menachem Begin ( later 6th Prime Minister of Israel), instructions to “carry out the operation on the chick (code for the King David Hotel). There were repeated delays due to changing political situations, but the plan was eventually finalised between Irgun Chief of Operations, Amichai Paglin (later, Counter-Terrorism Advisor for Prime Minister Begin) and Commander of the Palmach, Itzhak Sadeh (former Commander of the Haganah, Founder of the elite commando arm – the FOSH and, Founder of the IDF)…
91 people of various nationalities and religions were killed and 46 injured.


Disguised as Arab workmen and as hotel waiters, members of the Irgun planted 770 lb of explosives in the basement of the main building of the hotel. The resulting explosion caused the disintegration of the entire western half of the southern wing of the hotel. Some of the inflicted deaths and injuries occurred on the road outside the hotel and in adjacent buildings.


In the following short film [3:27], Menachem Begin (Prime Minister at the time), still admitted to the “Claim of Responsibility” for the Terrorist Attack, however, he declares innocence because; quote, “We did not imagine that even one life would be lost” due to alleged telephone warnings of the impending attack – a claim repudiated by Chief Secretary of the Mandate Government, John Shaw.
In an echo of today’s Israeli government, who blame their slaughter of Palestinian children on the Palestinians themselves – for purportedly putting the children in the firing-line of Israeli missiles and not heeding warnings in alleged leaflet drops – Begin blames the deaths on the British for ignoring the [alleged] telephone warnings. These ridiculous misdirecting claims, contradict the fact that after planting the main bomb in the Hotel basement, the Irgun terrorists quickly slipped out and detonated a small explosive in the street outside the hotels southern wing; which Begin asserts, was to keep passers-by away from the area.
The British Police report written in the aftermath of the bombing made it quite plain; that the timing of the bombing (12:37pm) coincided with more lunch-time diners filling the bars and restaurants of the hotel and, that the first smaller explosion also resulted in a higher death toll, because it caused spectators from the hotel to gather in its south-west corner, directly over the bomb planted in its basement. The first explosion also caused the presence in the hotel of many emergency personnel and injured Arabs, who were brought into the Secretariat after their bus full of passengers, which had been passing, was blasted onto its side.
This double delayed bombing tactic, is claimed by Israeli Officials today, as a Signature tactic of Al-Qaeda (which does not exist in reality) and other allegedly Islamic terrorist organisations, to move people in tactical positions for the second bomb, to claim more lives.

The following short documentary [8:56] – although holding a narration slanted by the mainstream view of the Israeli government and, restricted in content – exposes the pride, mind-set, drive and agenda of these Terrorists as they reflect on their extremism of the time. Men who, incidentally, enjoy a free citizenship – or rather impunity – in the jurisdiction of the illegal, Jewish occupational State of Israel… protected from extradition or any accountability for their Crimes Against Humanity.


“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish State in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organisation for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university of budding crooks.”
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

This “Birth of International Terrorism” as a world media event – the origins by the creators of “Claiming Responsibility” – choreographed to attract international attention; is recounted by Begin’s personal Secretary and Chief of Staff, Yechiel Kadishai (member of Terrorist Organisations; Betar and Irgun – arms and immigrant smuggler), as a proud era of their terrorism in using “brutal force in order to to get rid of them” as these atheist-Jews wanted a Jewish State immediately and could not wait for a Jewish Messiah… not believing in g-d, but believing he gave them Palestine?
Irgun Commander, Shrage Elis (also locally commended for his part in the assault on British Intelligence offices), says that it was important, if they succeeded, that the “whole world sees” that they can fight the British.
King David Hotel bomber, Izahk Zadok (alias), quite happily and proudly recounts – on location – his role in placing the bombs. Smiling, he says, “I was dressed like an Arab… like you know, Arafat.”

Although claiming that the King David Hotel bombing was purely in response to Operation Agatha (the British operation which saw the arrest of thousands of Jews, seized arms caches and occupied the Jewish Agency building, from which many evidential documents of the Agency’s involvement with Haganah, Irgun, Palmach and Lehi operations were obtained, ultimately filed – and bombed – at the King David CID offices), Menachim Begin had actually devised a strategy of leverage he believed would force the British out. He proposed a series of guerrilla and terrorist attacks that would humiliate the British and damage their prestige, forcing the British to resort to repressive measures, which in turn would alienate the Yishuv (pre-state Jewish residents)… a similar strategy as used in Germany.
Begin relied on the international Jewish media eagerly reporting the action, which he referred to as; “turning Palestine into a glass house” with the world looking in. This international attention focusing more and more on British repression, would, along with the Holocaust Survivor rhetoric, create international sympathy for the Jewish cause, resulting in political pressure on Britain (again, as in Germany). Ultimately, the British would be forced to choose between continued repression or withdrawal and Begin was certain that in the end, the British would leave.

begin-peace-prize-speech-shadowProtocols of the Learned Elders of Zion – 7:6  (pg 16)

“In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments o f the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us…”

Menachem Begin with several Irgun Terrorist Recruits, 1948.

The plan was put into action and began with bombing the British Immigration Departments in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Haifa. Next, the Income Tax Offices in those three cities were bombed, followed by a series of attacks on police stations in which many policemen were killed and weapons stolen. Meanwhile, the Lehi joined in with a series of shooting attacks on policemen too, with their operations being funded by Jewish merchants and insurance scams in the diamond industry (Irene Zisblatt was undoubtedly involved ∼ HT note).


Warwick Daily News, December 28, 1946 – Source: National Library of Australia

terrorists-make-fake-money-jewsLord Moyne, the British Resident Minister in the Middle East, who restricted Jewish immigration to Palestine, met with Winston Churchill October 26, 1944. He was surprised at the Prime Ministers changed attitude toward opening the flood-gates to Jewish immigration to Palestine. Chaim Weizmann, future President of Israel, had an urgent meeting with Churchill November 4, 1944 and Lord Moyne was assassinated by Lehi terrorists 2 days later.

Former head of Betar Poland, escaped convict and Lehi leader, Yitzhak Shamir (later, 7th Prime Minister of Israel), ordered Lord Moyne’s assassination. Prior to his Prime Minister-ship, Shamir was a leading Mossad operative, who directed Operation Damocles; the assassinations of German scientists working on the Egyptian missile program.
Commander of a Lehi fighting unit, Yaakov Banai (Betar member and founding member of the Polish Irgun; armed by the Polish government from 1935), said one of the purposes for Lord Moyne’s assassination was, “the action had to capture a place in the world press and lead political thoughts.”

bernadotte-shadowAlso assassinated by the Lehi was United Nations Mediator for Palestine, Folke Bernadotte, who proposed such settlements as: Full protection of religious and minority rightsGuarantees for Holy Places, religious buildings and sites; and Return of residents, displaced by the conflict. He was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

postage-stampsAlthough the Lehi was proclaimed to be absorbed into the IDF upon the Declaration of the State of Israel in May 1948, therefore disbanded, the Stern Gang terrorists assassinated Mr Bernadotte in September that same year. Titled as IDF soldiers, or Lehi terrorists, is apparently different according to Israeli international political linguistics… regardless, with either title, Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir (their former Lehi Commander) exhumed back to Israel the bodies of the assassins; Eliyahu Bet-Zuri (who also planned to assassinate Winston Churchill) and Eliyahu Hakim. Both were laid in the Jerusalem Hall of Heroism in a state funeral with full military honours, attended by Israeli dignitaries at annual commemorations. They were later exalted – along with other terrorists – by monuments, plaques and national stamps bearing their images.




Auschwitz internal Courthouse

The Third Geneva Convention clarifies that the status of a detainee may be determined by a “competent tribunal.” Until such time, he or she must be treated as a Prisoner of War. After a tribunal has determined that a detainee is an Unlawful Combatant, the “detaining power” may choose to give the Unlawful Combatant the rights and privileges of a prisoner of war as described in the Third Geneva Convention, but the detaining power is under no obligation to do so.

german-soldier-dismembered-and-disembowelled-by-guerilla-partisans-in-greeceAn Unlawful Combatant who directly engages in armed conflict, in violation of the Laws of War, may be detained and prosecuted under the domestic law of the detaining power for such criminal action.

Pictured Right: German Soldier dismembered and disemboweled by Guerilla Partisans, in Greece.



Palmach Strike-Force

The summer of 1945, at the end of WWII, the British were not changing their policy on immigration, or on creating a Jewish State. The Persecution Propaganda also failed to have evoked the world to insist on opening the gates of Palestine to solve the historical Jewish Question (Problem) and, considering the source of that alleged persecution had been defeated, it was no longer an excuse for the need for Jews to leave Europe. So the Holocaust rhetoric and the push for Official Sympathy went into overdrive. Public opinion, steered by Jewish publications, shifted decisively against alleged British repression, especially in the west.


‘British Board of Deputies Condemns Repression in Palestine’ – Source: National Library of Australia


Repressed “Survivors”

The authorities of the Jewish Agency, Weizmann, Sharett and Ben-Gurion, then sent feelers out to the Irgun and Lehi to discuss an alliance. The end result was the Jewish Resistance Movement, established in October 1945, a framework under which the combined Haganah, Irgun, Palmach and Lehi, launched a further series of more intense coordinated anti-British operations… accompanied by more and more migrant fighters, resulting in a bigger Terrorist force, attracting more political attention.

 vast-arms-caches-discovered-jewish-preparations-copyThe Advertiser, Adelaide, July 4, 1946. Front Page.
Excerpt: “Practically every able-bodied Jew in Palestine belonged to the Haganah Organisation…”
National Library of Australia 


The British Army had, for months, wanted to take military action against the Zionist underground terrorist organisations, but had been surprisingly and frustratingly blocked by High Commissioner Alan Cunningham. Cunningham was also opposed to action being taken against the [arm of the World Zionist Organisation] the Jewish Agency, whose Chairman, David Ben-Gurion, was later the 1st Prime Minister of Israel (also Executive Head of the WZO in 1946 and later implicated in the
assassination of JFK over Israels nuclear plant at Dimona).
night-of-bridges-train-1946The decision to action changed when on June 16, 1946, saw the “Night of the Bridges,” when the Palmach blew up eight road and rail bridges, disabling transport routes linking Palestine to neighbouring countries and, on June 17, the Lehi attacked railway workshops in Haifa. Afterwards, the Irgun kidnapped six British officers.

Operation Agatha was the response in order to “end the state of anarchy” that was escalating in Palestine since the Jewish influx.
Up to 25,000 British Security Forces conducted operations all over Palestine and raided the Jewish Agency building: 2,675 Jews were arrested (UK Hansard Records), including, Moshe Sharett (later, 2nd Prime Minister of Israel).


Right: Future Prime Minister of Israel, Moche Sharett, along with other members of the Jewish Agency, arrested and detained at the Latrun camp in Palestine.


Article Left: Cairns Post, 30th December, page 1 – Source: National Library of Australia
Article Right: Kalgoolie Miner, 19th April, page 5.
Source: National Library of Australia

Just at Yagur alone, more than 300 rifles, some 100 2-inch mortars, more than 400,000 bullets, some 5,000 grenades and 78 revolvers were seized. All the men of Yagur were arrested, road-blocks maintained and curfews were imposed. According to Wikipedia, in protest, the women ripped their clothing off and showed their [alleged] Work-Camp Tattoos, bewailing, “this is what the Nazi’s did.” Reportedly, in response, several British troops shouted “Heil Hitler” as they continued to conduct the searches.


July 24, 1946, the Statement of Information Relating to Acts of Violence was published (2 days after the King David Hotel Bombing, but was prepared prior), which provided evidence on the Jewish insurgency in Palestine, including evidence that the Jewish Agency had in fact been involved with and coordinating with the terrorist groups. The pinnacle piece of evidence provided, was that authoritative telegrams sent from London to Palestine, by Chaim Weizmann (President of the World Zionist Organisation and 1st President of Israel) had been intercepted, identifying him as the operative under the code-name, Hayyim(UK Hansard records).

It is now officially claimed, that after the bombing of the King David Hotel, the Haganah, from then on, would rarely mount attacks against British forces and focused primarily on the Aliyah Bet-illegal immigrant smuggling. Although with the supposed amalgamation of the Terrorist Organisations under the ‘Jewish Resistance Movement’ and the wave of emigres; member activities, contacts and loyalties were difficult to determine.


Hanged and boobie-trapped bodies of British Sergeants Clifford Martin and Mervyn Paice

The Irgun and Lehi, quite proudly, continued waging full-scale insurgency attacks against the British, including (but not limited to), the Night of the Beatings, the Acre Prison break and the Sergeants affair and, together with the Haganah’s (and others) illegal immigration smuggling operations from Europe, it was exponentially increasing the influx of terrorist operatives within Palestine. After years of civil war due to the Balfour Declaration and almost 6 years of world war fighting on behalf of International Jewry (who Declared War on Germany in 1933 and 1938), now fighting against Jewry in Palestine, forced a large commitment of war-weary British forces to the country, which was gradually sapping British financial war credits, coincidentally, controlled by Jewish Financiers in London.


Palestine Police WANTED and REWARD Ad for Terrorists who orchestrated and escaped during the Acre Prison Break, disguised in British uniforms and Arab civilian attire. The murder of the two British Sergeants, was in reprisal for the apprehended escapees.

In September 1947, the British cabinet voted to leave Palestine and in November of that year, the United Nations imposed a Resolution to Partition the country between Arabs and Jews… which, as predicted by the Arab Higher Committee in 1938, would be ignored by Jews.


Pax Brittanica falls and passes the batten to Pax Americana, to take the role on behalf of International Jewry – an incremental phase toward Pax Judaica… discovered in Part Two.


March 12, 1948: The United Nations Special Committee on Palestine reported that;
“present indications point to the inescapable conclusion that when the [British] mandate is terminated, Palestine is likely to suffer severely from administrative chaos and widespread strife and bloodshed.”

(List of Massacres against Palestinians: 1947 – 1994)

(List of UN Resolutions on Israel regarding Palestine – more than all other Nations combined)
(UN Resolution 3379, Nov 10, 1975, recalls UN/Res 77 “the racist regime in occupied Palestine” and “condemned zionism as a threat to world peace and security” determining “zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.”

courier-headline-3000-jews-attacking-arabs Courier Mail, April 26, 1948. Source: National Library of Australia

For the background as to why and how the International Jew manipulated both WWI and WWII, please listen to the speech given by Benjamin H. Freedman at the Willard Hotel, 1961, which gives an overview of the machinations behind both wars and, the establishment of the occupying State of Impunity – the Jewish State.

Mr Freedman, who was born into Judaism and later converted to Catholicism, was a journalist, an international diplomat, political peace activist, Founder of the international League for Peace with Justice in Palestine – 1946, an associate of assassinated United States President, John F. Kennedy, writer for the ‘Common Sense’ periodical and attendee at the conference for the WWI, Versailles Peace Treaty in France, 1919.

Part Two – COMING SOON – Subscribe to receive updates

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Further Resources:

“Nazi’s” Never Existed

There was never any such organisation as Nazi’s or a Nazi Party

The National Socialists (N.S.D.A.P. 1024px-speaker_icon-svg Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) never referred to themselves as Nazi’s.
It was, as it still is today, a political slogan used as a repressive weapon for the purposes of stifling dissent – hypocritically, the very social condition the National Socialists’ enemies have accused purported “evil Nazi’s” of having inflicted upon the German populace of the 1930’s.
The term “Nazi” is nothing more than an epithet and after 90 years, it is high time we learned where it came from, who invented it and why.

The term “Nazi” was actually created by the Communist-Marxist enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was/is a pejorative connotation; a belittling insult and a slur. The Germans, not Hitler, nor any other high ranking party officials ever referred to themselves as “Nazis”! They called themselves ‘National Socialists’ and nothing more.
Those who can read German and have studied any of the original documents and speeches, should know this already, but most do not. Yet the world and countless generations continue to echo this epithet as if it was as certain as the sun rising. This should give some insight into the mind manipulating power of media and propaganda. It should then, also give a clear indication of who is actually in control of the worlds media and propaganda – the Communist-Marxist enemies!

The term ‘Nazi’ (along with ‘Nazism’) is little more than a political epithet invented by Konrad Heiden during the 1920’s, as a means of disparaging the NSDAP and the political and financial ideals of National Socialism in general. Heiden was a member of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and conveniently, also an influential Jewish journalist for both the Frankfurter Zeitung and the Vossische Zeitung German newspapers. Heiden’s SDP was renowned for its internal conflict created by its elements of Marxist members and progressively during the 1920’s and early 1930’s, ultimately lost the majority of its seats in the Reichstag to the National Socialists. By 1933, of the 647 seats in the Reichstag, the NSDAP held 288, the SDP held only 120 and the Communist Party, a mere 81 seats.

The slang term Nazi is a variation of the nickname Sozi (short for Sozialisten), which, at the time, was used in reference to members of Heidens’ SDP. “Nazi” was a political pun, based upon the Austro-Bavarian slang word for “simpleton” or “country bumpkin” and derived from the fairly common name, Ignatz (German form of Ignatius), colloquially meaning, a foolish, clumsy or awkward person. It would be the equivalent of calling someone “nutsy.”
So, if for no other reason than it being an insult, it should be easily understood why the term was regarded as derogatory by the National Socialists and why they would never use it to describe themselves as such.
One should also see why it would be made popular by the Communist-Marxist agitating propagandists and understood how it was seized upon by various other political opponents and subversive political movements – both within Germany and abroad – including the political leaders of the western powers, who clearly had been infiltrated by the same Communist-Marxist elements as well. [also see here]

It should immediately become apparent that, if there is no such thing as a “Nazi” – except in the propaganda which was invented and spewed by this man – then it follows logically, that there is also no such thing as a “Neo-Nazi” either. Those who would describe themselves as such are as ignorant as those who say they “hate Nazi’s” – they are equally deceived.
Further, again, if there was never any such thing as a “Nazi” (which includes the conspiratorial suggestion that there is purported magical etymology of ‘Na-Zi’) then there was never any political party merger between the National Socialists (Na-) and the Zionist Parties (-Zi), as gatekeeping and co-intelligence operations, even disseminated by the likes of Eustace Mullins, would suggest… there were never any ‘Zionist’ parties to begin with, let alone merger with them?
Those who believe and are led by such clever nonsense, are also equally deceived. This clever nonsense (along with much more) is used purely to misdirect people away from ever discovering the core truth of the Third Reich’s simple, however extraordinary achievements and more importantly, WHY and HOW they were achieved, which was in complete defiance of the well coordinated network of international politics and finance… the easy and simple truth of prosperity that can be obtained by all, which the international Communist propagandists fear the people of the world would ever discover, as it would see their monumental, parasitic power, disintegrate virtually overnight.

It is therefore, also highly likely, that those who promote ‘Neo-Nazism’ are also just agents whose job it is to keep the spectre of ‘evil Nazis’ alive in the minds of the divided and oppressed ethnic populations (as we also continually see with countless movies and allusions from all media), in order to continually effect the demonisation of all those who would dare question the whole history about Hitler, the National Socialists and WWII… which we have all, naively, been sold.

Further study at, Justice-4-Germans:…/exposing-the-nazi-epithet-who…/
Demystifying the Transfer Agreement
and the Alleged National Socialist-Zionist Merger; and,
The National Socialist-Zionist Merger Myth

According to Wikipedia:
[Konrad Heiden (7 August 1901 – 18 June 1966) was an influential Jewish journalist and historian of the Weimar Republic and “Nazi” eras, most noted for the first influential biographies of German dictator Adolf Hitler. Often, he wrote under the pseudonym “Klaus Bredow]

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Swastika vs Star of Rempham

The Svastika ‘SWASTIKA’ comes from the Sanskrit word ‘स्वस्तिक'(svastika) which literally means “that which is associated with well-being.”

The word and symbol has been mentioned in innumerable Hindu texts and the sacred Vedas. Also found in other ancient off-shoot religions of Hinduism, like Buddhism and Jainism, with variant meanings. Found heavily in ancient European cultures, such as the Ancient Germanic Iron Age, Celts, Armenians, Ireland, Korea etc. Even Native Americans have many swastika motifs on their arts.

The earliest known depiction of the Swastika is from the Ukraine, dated as far back as 10,000BC and carved on Mammoth ivory.
The Swastika (also called a Fylfot or Hakenkreuz) appears on various Germanic Migration Period and Viking Age artifacts, from the 3rd to 9th century, from Denmark, the Gothic spearhead from Brest-Litov, Belarus, Russia to Armenia and the Norse…

Continue Reading…

Volksvagens for all Volksdeutsche

Hitler’s plan for all German families to have an affordable car to travel the Autobhan, explore the country-side and connect with nature

The Volkswagen was a center-piece of the National Socialists desire to benefit ordinary Germans. Hitler proposed to build a cheap car that almost anyone could afford. He gave it the name “KdF Wagen,” which we know as the Volkswagen. KdF was the abbreviation for ‘Kraft durch Freude’ (Strength through Joy), a subsidiary of the Deutsche Arbeitsfront (German Labor Front), headed by Robert Ley.

vw poster

The enormous expansion of the German high system, particularly the Reich Autobahn system, which like the growth in automobile manufacturing, came from the Fuhrer’s orders and looked far into the future. Both projects go along with each other, and today hardly anyone does not cheerfully support Adolf Hitler’s work in these areas. The Fuhrer’s will, that the entire people should benefit from their common labours has repeatedly shown itself in recent years. It was only natural that it was always close to Hitler’s heart that this also include those with limited incomes.

At the automobile exhibitions during the first years after Hitler became Chancellor, he clearly expressed his wish for a Volkswagen that the automobile industry had to consider it, an order or a commission. As is known, in prior years, the German automobile industry was barely able to produce enough of its own models in a reasonably timely fashion, even when fully using all its labor, plants and machines.

It was thus no surprise that early in 1937 the Fuhrer gave the leader of the German Labor Front, the order to use all the means of his organisation of millions of workers, along with the NS Community ‘Kraft durch Freude,’ to realise his dream. As early as 1934, he had talked with the most famous German automotive engineer, Dr. Porsche, about carrying out his ideas, and had given him the commission to undertake the construction of the German Volkswagen.

Early in May 1937, Dr. Ley carried out the Fuhrer’s commission to found the ‘Society for the Preparation of the German Volkswagen.’ The manufacturer, Dr. Porsche, the automotive expert, J. Werlin and the Reichsamtsleiter ‘Kraft durch Freude’ Dr. Lafferentz were appointed the leaders of this organisation.

vw modelThe three party comrades worked hand in hand to determine the immediate tasks, and then to take up the factories, methods, and distribution of this new car. Dr. Lafferentz was responsible for a large part of the plan to construct a large factory to build the Volkswagen in Fallersleben, near Braunschweig.
After long efforts, the whole plan took final form. The whole project had been organised. For years, one had heard little about the project until the Fuhrer’s speech at the Automobile Exhibition in 1938, where he revealed the happy secret.
Among other things, Adolf Hitler said…

Continue Reading here…

1938 News Report: Financial War on “Anti-Semitic States” for “Persecuting Jewish FINANCIERS” not Civilian Jews

The Worker, the official organ of the Australian Labour Party in Queensland and regular periodical for various amalgamated Labour Unions throughout Australia (see here), reported to the world on January 4, 1938, that “International Jewry” was orchestrating a heavily funded financial war, in addition to their previous Declaration of War‘ – being the continuance of the 1933 world-wide Economic Boycott against Germany.

financiers_shadow-copyINTERNATIONAL JEWRY – Financial War Planned Against Anti-Semitic States – £500,000,000 Fund to be Raised

‘Jewry, faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Germany, Austria, and elsewhere, intends to hit back,’ says the ‘Sunday Chronicle,’ according to a cable dated London, January 2.

‘The battle will be fought on the world’s stock exchanges. Most of the anti-Semitic States are burdened with debts, and they may find their very existence threatened.

‘The leaders of international Jewry will meet in a village near Geneva this week to plan a fund of £500,000,000 with which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers in all parts of the world.

‘No difficulty is expected in raising such a fund, which, combined with a trade boycott, will enable the launching a counter-offensive, in which the Jewish persecutors may be defeated.”

Source: National Library of Australia 

For over eight decades, the world has been led to believe that from the outset of 1933, the Germans “Persecuted” everyday German-Jews for simply being Jewish, even though German-Jews of the time, denounced this international propaganda. By International Jewry’s own admission, it was the self proclaimed “Jewish FINANCIERS” who – incidentally had their parasitic usurious positions outlawed by Germany’s Economic Reform –  were the ones being singled out and they did in fact feel the need to differentiate themselves from everyday Jews with this claim, as to who was supposedly being persecuted.
The targeting of “Jewish Financiers” was a well founded claim, as NSDAP policies and reform saw the cleansing of Communists in governmental positions and immoral financial and trading practices removed from the Reich – it just so happened that around 98% of these Communists and unscrupulous Speculators, were in fact Jewish. If these communist elements within Germany were Spanish or Chinese, their resulting fate would have been the same and it would have been due to their corrupt practices which greatly effected German society, not their ethnicity – as the other 2% of non-Jewish communists who also lost their positions, attests to.
However, whether being forbidden to continue economic rape against a nation and its people, could be considered “Persecution” is another question. Perhaps the reader may want to consider what life is like as the impoverished, starving and economically raped people, opposed to those minority tycoons who had their astronomical revenues through economic debt slavery reduced, in order to identify who was actually being persecuted?


judea-declares-war_shadowThis same ‘International Jewry’ Declared War on Germany in 1933, with the same ‘Jewish Persecution’ propaganda as the excuse… but what had actually occurred at this point in 1933? The German-Jews denounced the international Persecution Propaganda in defense of the honour of Germany, the Nuremberg Laws weren’t enacted until late 1935, even many German-Jews who lived under two flags at that later time, saw them as reasonable and did not suffer any deprivations with a new National status and, the Krystallnacht False-Flag – which resulted in the internment of many German-Jews – did not occur until November 1938 (10 months after the aforementioned half a billion Jewish financial war plan)… so what prompted ‘International Jewry’ to Declare War on Germany in 1933?

The duly elected Adolf Hitler became Chancellor on January 30, 1933 and less than two months later, Judea Declared Economic Warfare on Germany, March 24, 1933 – coincidentally, only one day after Hitler received Plenary Power, via the passing of the Enabling Act – the Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich (“Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich”). The Law to Remedy Distress, resulted in communist non-effect in the Reichstag, the abolition of over 30 useless, divide and conflicting parties that had destroyed Germany for the previous 14 years. The fact that it was International Jewry who responded to the abolition of communist power within Germany, by economic warfare, also attests to who the communists were/are.
(Hitler’s Reichstag speech, March 23, 1933)
International Jewry’s Declaration of Economic Warfare on Germany, was no idle threat upon a suffering people, who were reliant on their export in order for the people just to eat. The NSDAP came into possession of an impoverished nation and starving people, had virtually no army, the country was broke, enslaved by impossible WWI reparations and more than 30% of the people were suffering unemployment… all while a privileged few were living the high life at the expense of the starving and poverty stricken majority.
Germany had nothing in its hands to be a threat to anyone (except communist and financier positions) and with the monumental national problems within the country, the priorities of what deserved attention to revive the German Nation, did not revolve around putting yellow star stickers on less than one half of 1% of the population, as some inane attempt at national remedy.
However, what the NSDAP did possess, was a well prepared plan for economic reform and a 25 Point Program for the revival of the Nation, a program which was pivotal on the embodiment of the National Socialists Economic Reform. A program that would have been hindered if the communist votes were allowed to remain in the Reichstag.

The NSDAP’s Economic Reform for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money, was widely known in economist circles from 1919 and the 25 Point Program was publicly announced on February 24, 1920… It was this well considered and developed plan, which the NSDAP absolutely intended to implement, is what the self proclaimed “Jewish” Financiers anticipated and knew to be a threat to their corrupt, yet powerful positions. These international financial Tycoons and war profiteers, obviously felt a pre-emptive Counter-Offensive was in order!
A look at a few of the 25 Points will highlight who would benefit from them and who would detest these economic principles, claiming the abolition of their national theft as Persecution;

6. The right to vote on the State’s government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.

11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.

The Breaking of the Slavery of Interest

12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.

15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.

17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land. *

18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.

Point 6: Opposed to being considered pro-German, shockingly enough in Germany itself, it has been ridiculed as discriminatory toward Jews; but in Western Nations, is it not Constitutional that Prime Ministers and Presidents be citizens of the nations they purport to lead, in attempt to guarantee national loyalties? Further, for example, would it be considered a moral political principle for U.S. citizens to flood Chinese Parliamentary positions, to dictate how the Chinese people will be administered in their own land, by American ideological legislative enactments? Would it be ethical to allow an ethnicity of less than 0.5% of any population, to decide how another ethnicity of +99% will be administered in their own land? Is that not contradictory to the Universal Right of Self-Determination, where Peoples have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and political policies, without interference?


Point 18
may seem excessively harsh to those who are absent of understanding in exactly how injurious the unscrupulous practices of usury and speculator profiteering is to the people… Usury, or rather issuing debt (via IOU) with attached interest, is not the exchange or loan of money… it is the demand of payment from one party (the Creditor) – for which they gave or forfeited absolutely nothing – from another party (the Debtor), who is required to extract affluence to service the greater interest first, before even reducing the principle, which is only based on an inequivalent, minimal fraction of a reserved asset (Fractional Reserve Lending). When this is done on a large scale, on a national scale, in the Millions and Billions, it is nothing but economic rape and enslavement of a nations people, who are ordered to exchange their time, their effort, their labour, their creativity, ingenuity, productivity and their time away from family, to give all the fruit of their efforts to economic racketeers, to self-licensed loan sharks, who gave them nothing in the first instance except an accounting entry of debt – a flick of a pen… this is precisely what Point 11 of the NSDAP’s program is referring to- “The abolition of incomes unearned by work.”
This infinite debt system, of interest on interest (demand for everything in exchange for nothing) is the ONLY CAUSE of endless inflation; and the worlds so-called Leaders, who contract these International Financiers, through promise to service their demand, do not produce anything. So where do the worlds so-called Leaders (middle-men) extract payment from to serve the International Financiers? Of course the people, the producers, who are the only source of affluence from which it can be extracted and, as the effect of interest on interest continually increases the debt demand, newly invented and increased taxes, fees, levy’s, tolls, fines, schemes and the general increase in the cost of everything, is the only way the Leaders can create increasing revenue to meet the International Financiers interest-debt demands… thus, continually reducing the value of the currency.
Is it fair or ethical to get something for nothing, through legalised theft demand? What about getting everything for nothing? Who in their right mind would think anyone who has risked nothing and given nothing, has the right to demand from another almost all the benefits of everything they’ve produced and created? What could benefit the people if all the fruits of their efforts were reinvested back into the peoples interests (by the billions), opposed to continually flowing into the pockets of the debt creators, the self-licensed loan sharks, who offered nothing?
This is a crime, a theft, so massive, so incomprehensible against all people, depriving them of the reward of their efforts and in most cases, depriving them of their most basic needs to live…
This is a crime against humanity!
So is Point 18 excessively harsh considering the scale of theft, deprivation, poverty imposition and enslavement? Is it Persecution to be denied the legal ability to continue wide-spread economic enslavement and theft, from the many to the few? Is it Persecution to out-law individuals from being able to conduct crimes against humanity under the threat of punishment? This writer thinks not! The reader can come to their own conclusion.

Anti-Semitic States…?

The Worker reports that “Anti-Semitic States” [are burdened with debt], colloquially suggesting that a national, political institution (a ‘State’), holds a racial ideological bias, on behalf of all individuals under that political system, which would include Jews themselves? Whether today’s Jews of European origin are in fact Semites, is for a different discussion. In any event, the clarification of what pertains to an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ by the self-proclaimed Jewish Financiers, continues to be pursuant to economic policies and who has control over a nations policies.

Through the vote of the German people, Hitler won against the Communists in Germany, he threw out the Bankers and their fraudulent credit systems from the nation, created a new carefully controlled currency tied directly to labour (not speculative gold), developed immense public works programs for employment and installed tight controls on prices and wages – income for the German people which he increased by 10.9%. Stock markets were also controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators; as such, Germany’s Reichsmark could not be speculated against on the international markets and Germany’s sovereign currency was not part of the Jewish financiers international usury debt system.
Mussolini’s Italy worked similarly with its own economic system, including expropriatory tax on war profits and large scale public works, thus, was also considered an ‘Anti-Semitic State’ with Japan later following a close third.

As a ‘State’ in the political spectrum, is generally applied to policies which implementations are mostly related to economics; and as the self described Jewish Financiers claim it was they who were being Persecuted by said State, it would appear, by their own definition, that an “Anti-Semitic State” is one which does not give the Jewish Financiers free reign over their nations people and productivity, nor legislative capacity for their economic debt slavery systems.
A nation not enslaved by usurious debt to the International Jewish Financiers, thus not under its control, is somehow Anti-Semitic?

Burdened with debt…?

great-gold-heist_1933_shadowWas it not all nations who were involved in WWI that were burdened with [war] debt? Was it not this war debt that spurred the manipulated Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929, which grew into the Great Depression of longevity through to the late 1930’s? Who benefited from this great suffering of peoples from all nations around the world, buying up everything for a penny on the pound? Who used this manipulated scenario to steal all the Americans gold, with the excuse it needed to be confiscated to the private shareholders of the Federal Reserve in order to revive from the Great Depression – facilitated by FDR’s Executive Order 6102, better-known as the Great Gold Heist of 1933? Who were the War Profiteers, Market Speculators and International Financiers that could have foreseen and benefited from such a war and resulting international economic catastrophe? The reader can perhaps speculate themselves to find that answer?

It was many of the western nations which were also still laden with WWI debt and could not pay it at the time (and thanks to interest on interest, are still paying for it today). But unlike Jewish Bolshevik Russia, following the so-called Russian Revolution (rather, Jewish usurpation of Russia) – conveniently, a mid-WWI coup d’etat – National Socialist Germany did not abandon the WWI debt and was making good on the payments. The Jewish Bolshevik USSR – for some reason(?) – wasn’t subjected to a credit recall like other nations? Special nepotistic favouritism by the creditors perhaps? However, Germany did not have gold reserves, they were stolen by the All-lies during WWI, but somehow, after total blame for WWI, accompanied by the astronomical reparation payments (“Tribute Madness” as Hitler referred), civil war, the Great Depression which the entire world was suffering and the greatest hyperinflation a nation has ever been subjected to in history, began to thrive economically and prosper above all other nations; and unemployment was near eradicated from over 30.1% in 1932 to 2.1% by the end of 1935, regardless of the WWI debt.
Was this just some economic accident, a miracle, perhaps an unexplainable ‘Economic Miracle’ as the victor economists would have us believe? Or was it simply ‘Economic Logic’ facilitated by a well considered and planned Economic Reform?

With the differing national economic formats, it might beg the question also; why couldn’t the Allies make good on their WWI payments? Who was it they were actually indebted to – therefore controlled by? Were these industrious nations not able to manage their own currencies and productivity, to find a way to feed their people? Despite the invisible debt, did they not have vast resources and the physical capacity to at least grow food, thereby creating work to produce it?
Of course, if external entities control a nations currency, control the gold reserves (or confiscated it), therefore controlling the value of currency based on the fractional gold standard (which in-turn makes it a commodity of speculation in itself), then these entities which have issued the debt (IOU imposition) dictate where any revenue or surplus – if any – will be directed… Obviously the International financiers, in the interests of humanity and good will, did not (and will not) find it in their hearts to forego this debt created from a flick of a pen, to direct future revenue back to the people. The debtors, being beholden to the currency creators, the creditors, the self-licensed loan sharks, then offer the nations public assets to service the unpaid debt (credit recall), thus making the International Financiers the owners of those countries National productivity, manufacturing, infrastructure and utilities etc. (commonly disguised as Privatisation) who in-turn, ultimately charge the people for the use of their own public services they built… Unfortunately, post-privatisation, the people no longer receive the affluence generated from their own collective productivity, as the former public services become private businesses for profit. Further, the International Financiers still demand the interest on interest be paid! But where would that revenue come from once the people lose the benefits of their privatised public services and works? Inflation and an endless creation of new and increased taxes. This is total theft and wealth extraction out of all nations who submit to the demands of the International Financiers, who are nothing but large scale Counterfeiters = Criminals!
I refer to Point 18 of the NSDAP Program.

So who would these external elements of fiat currency (debt) issuance be? Could it be the same self-described Jewish Financiers? Why would these Jewish Financiers, if not International Financiers, be interested in foreign states who have taken steps to implement their own sovereign economic systems, having to describe them as “Anti-Semitic States”?
In reflection of the economically crippled world of the day, the majority of nations had the suffering yolk of international war debt and results of commodity speculation around their necks, thus controlled and owned… but the few nations that broke free from this economic enslavement system, giving back to their own people, whilst still paying the debt, were the ones the world was told, were an evil threat to humanity, had war declared upon them and were labelled Anti-Semitic.
“Anti-Semitic States burdened with debt”? No, States not under Jewish Financier control!

“In the exchange of telegrams from the 1939 -1940 period,
the British were ready to negotiate peace, if
Germany returned to the Gold Standard.”
∼ Captain J. Creagh-Scott, 1947


Jewry faced with persecution in Poland, Rumania, Austria…?

The Persecution narrative which had been peddled throughout the world in regard to European Jews, was not only a repetitive escalation of propaganda since the 1933 Jewish Declaration of War against Germany, but common propaganda prior to the Third Reich and beyond; even claiming Jewish Persecution under the Jewish coup government that usurped Empirical Russia (aka Russian Revolution), persecuted by their co-religionists, even though under U.S.S.R. law Anti-Semitism was punishable by death?
So is there any logical claim that Jewry was subject to persecution by Rumania as an Anti-Semitic State? Rumania was not allied with Germany or any other state at this time, it sought to maintain neutrality and cordial international relations. Poland had its own inner ethnic turmoil, social and employment problems, but was not allied with Germany either. However, with the cordial and progressive efforts Hitler had made toward diplomatic relations, the late First Marshall of Poland, Jozef Pilzudski and Adolf Hitler did sign a German-Polish non Aggression Pact in 1934, agreeing to forego military conflict for a period of 10 years and Germany recognising Polands borders… Unfortunately, Marshall Pilzudski died in 1935. Poland had historically been used by Allied states to incite war and border conflict – a cordial relationship with Germany would not have been pleasing to the International Financiers and war mongers, therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State.
Hitler speaks on German-Polish Peace here.


Despite Rumania’s 1921 Little Entente alliance in defense of potential Hungarian territorial ambitions, an agreement to supposedly safeguard against any restoration by the Habsburgs in response the Versailles Treaty and, the previous 1926 military pact with France, via the 1921 Act, King Carol II was caught in a sphere of power struggles and desired to stay neutral as much as possible. However, it too had communist political party conflict, internal ethnic turmoil from sizable ethnic minorities, border disputes, along with its much sought after natural resources, especially oil. Germany’s contract with Royal Dutch Shell, via its pro-Nationalist CEO, Henri Deterding, who had contracts with Rumanian oil too, saw the commodity speculators not impressed with the growing German-Rumanian diplomatic relations that were unfolding, especially after the Little Entente’s complete disbandment in 1938 – therefore, must have been an Anti-Semitic State. King Carol’s Rumania became ripe for social turmoil and movements, to keep Romania with state weakening internal strife, so as to not side with, or trade with Germany.

Austria? Since the end of WWI, the Austrian people who had arbitrarily been subject to the dissection of the German/Austro-Hungarian Empire, via the Versailles dictat and the Treaty of Saint Germain, had desired to re-join the German Reich and even more eagerly, since Germany began to prosper under National Socialism, while they themselves suffered in debt and poverty. But in defiance of the peoples right to self-determination, the merger was forbidden by the WWI All-lies! Austrian Leader Engelbert Dollfuss also vehemently opposed it, especially after Hitler became Chancellor in 1933. Austria too was in political, social and economic turmoil, with revolutionary movements and even civil war in 1934. Dollfuss eventually dissolved parliament and made himself dictator, outlawing movements against him. He was a conservative, anti-Communist and attempted to model himself and his government on Mussolini’s Fascism. He was assassinated during a 1934 attempted coup d’etat, the July Putsch and his successor, Kurt Schuschnigg, followed closely in his format. The growing national feeling to unite once again with Germany, would have been an anxious anticipation for the Jewish Financiers. So to excite international condemnation of Austria, by defamatory accusations of an Anti-Semitic State, served as a strategic psychological precursor for international support for war, whether it be military or economic warfare. Unlike in Italy and Germany, the Rothschilds were still conducting their usurious financial business in Austria, but only 3 months after the above financial war plan was announced, 99.71% of the people turned out and 99.73% of the those Austrian people voted to rejoin the Reich in an April 10, 1938 Referendum. On the same day, another Referendum was held in Germany to ask the volk if they wished to rejoin Austria too. Of the 99.5% of the people who turned out, 99.8% of the German people agreed to unite again with their Austrian brothers and sisters… The Rothschild bank in Vienna was closed that same week, with all of its assets seized by the Reich government… the act of an apparent Anti-Semitic State against corrupt Financiers

Adolf Hitler Speaks At Heldenplatz In Vienna 15 March 1938
in the unification of Germany and Austria.

They may find their very existence threatened…?

The self-described Jewish Financiers and Leaders of International Jewry, felt that strongly about their systems and economic positions of extreme power being potentially replaced, that not only did they declare a world-wide economic boycott on Germany in 1933 – which had no long term effect once Germany took control of its own economy – but 5 years later wanted to target nations who might establish their own sovereign currencies and trade practices along with Germany too. They stated this financial war would “be fought on the worlds stock exchanges,” but as we have already established above, Germany’s Reichsmark was not part of the Jewish Financiers usury system and therefore could not be speculated against on international markets and the German stock markets were also tightly controlled to keep prices from being manipulated by international market speculators. So whose very existence were they now threatening? The Polish? The Rumanians? The Austrians?
As we’ve witnessed over many generations, when these international economic players impose Blockades, Boycotts and Sanctions (same effect – different titles) against various nations people, their very existence is actually threatened and ultimately millions upon millions of civilian people have starved to death, or by disease and illness due to not having access to sanitary and medical supplies. This is the inhumane extent that International Jewry are prepared to go to, in order to keep their financial power over nations and peoples.

However, was this £500,000,000 (an estimated $52.6 Trillion USD today) actually going to be used purely on the world stock exchanges? Considering that the New York Stock Exchange in 2011 alone, measured Market Capitalisation (USD Billions) at 14,242; and Trade Value (USD Billions) at 20,161; then one could speculate where this finance would be directed.
Another aspect to consider is the Stock Market Crash of 1929 had reduced the value in all capital just 9 years earlier…

The £500,000,000 was clearly an extremely excessive amount of wealth in the day, to be held by one group or organisation, as the Worker reported that; ‘The leaders of international Jewry [who met in a village near Geneva] expected no trouble in raising such a fund – which to fight the persecutors of Jewish financiers and obviously this kind of excessive economic power would not be relinquished with honour, or without a fight. The owners (or confiscators) of gold did actually do very well from the 1929 crash, as the price of a single ounce of gold rose from just $291 an ounce in 1929, to $539 in 1939… how speculatively lucky for those who held confiscated the gold?

Coincidentally, a year later, the Cairns Post reported on July 8, 1939 (3 months before the outbreak of war – allegedly a surprise invasion by Germany), that the Governors of the Bank of England had planned for a secret gold vault to store, yes, quite the coincidence, £500,000,000 worth of gold, for war securities.

SECRET VAULT FOR £500,000,000

Governors of the Bank of England have drawn up plans for transporting £500,000,000 – of the nations’s gold reserve to a secret vault in the country in the event of war.
This vault is hundreds of miles from London, and comprises a bomb-proof safe deposit. The convoy, will be escorted by an armed guard of both police and soldiers
The gold represents Britain’s staying power-the basis on which war loans might be raised, and the purchasing power which will ensure supplies of food and raw materials from overseas.

Where was this funding spent? Was anything actually spent?

Let’s use one nation for an example… The American mobilisation for WWII at the end of 1941, had moved approximately ten million people out of the civilian labour force and into the war. Government-financed capital spending accounted for only 5% of the annual U.S. investment in industrial capital in 1940; but by 1943, it had increased to 67% of all U.S. investment.

Bernard Baruch was yet another Jewish financier, stock investor and political consultant. As a partner in A.A. Housman & Company, his earnings and commissions enabled him to buy a seat on the New York Stock Exchange. There he amassed a fortune before the age of 30 by profiting from speculation in the market. By 1910, he had become one of Wall Street’s best-known financiers. In a treasonous display of conflict of interest, he was appointed Chief Advisor to both war-time U.S. Presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt on all economic matters; and during WWII Baruch controlled 351 of the most important branches of American heavy industry. He was on the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense and, in 1918, he was the chairman of his new War Industries Board, which managed the US’ economic mobilisation during WWI. He also served as a staff-member at the Versailles conference in France.
For his work in WWI, Baruch was awarded the Army Distinguished Service Medal which cited, in part; Baruch, a United States Civilian, for exceptionally meritorious and distinguished services to the Government of the United States, in a duty of great responsibility during World War I, in the organization and administration of the War Industries Board and in the coordination of allied purchases in the United States. By establishing a broad and comprehensive policy for the supervision and control of the raw materials, manufacturing facilities, and distribution of the products of industry, he stimulated the production of war supplies, coordinated the needs of the military service and the civilian population, and contributed alike to the completeness and speed of the mobilization and equipment of the military forces and the continuity of their supply.”


Winston Churchill and Bernard Baruch

When the United States entered WWII, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a Special Adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization. He supported what was known as a “Work or Fight” bill. Baruch advocated the creation of a permanent Super-agency similar to his old Industries Board of WWI. His theory ‘elevated the role of Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists in determining what was needed and who would produce it.’ But did the U.S. have surplus to be able to afford all this war time spending to these Civilian Businessmen, especially after the Great Depression? If not, where was the vast finance for it sourced from? Which Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists profiteered from this great war-time expenditure and investment in war production? And on top of that, who would the war debt, with interest on interest be paid to at the end of the war? Has it even been paid off today?

In yet another economic coincidence on the international stage of profiteering and war debt, on February 12, 1949, the Townsville Daily Bulletin reported, that foreign borrowers had defaulted on their payments and interest, to the tune of… you guessed it… £500,000,000.

£500,000,000 DEFAULT

LONDON, Feb. 11. – Foreign borrowers who have defaulted in their payments of capital and interest, now owe British investors nearly £500 million.
The Council of Foreign Bondholders says this in its annual report.
The council protects the interests of holders of foreign government, State or municipal obligations issued in Britain.


Considering that we know Germany’s currency could hardly be effected by international market speculators in 1938, and due to the self sufficiency of the 4 Year Plan having succeeded exponentially, we learn that it is the people with money to spend, is what in fact creates national economic growth. Only the public demand for produce and manufacturing (resulting in more paid employment for further spending and demand), can stimulate national economies… which is the effect of compounding affluence, opposed to compounding interest-debt/extraction – it is the very difference between a positive affluence based currency, opposed to a negative debt based currency. Demand cannot be created by a poor people without money and no employment in manufacturing or production can be developed, unless there is people wanting the goods and can actually buy it. No manufacturer or producer will grow or make more than what is in demand, thus, will not need further employees.
This type of economic growth can never be achieved with a debt based currency system, as all the affluence is continually flowing from the many people, to the few loan-sharks. Such is the format of Jewish usury systems all over the world… the economic enslavement of all people, never to rise above negative debt, to positive affluence.

The mechanics of the Third Reich’s economic system, saw the nation come from being the most impoverished and starving during the world-wide Great Depression, to soaring in prosperity above all others, almost instantaneously. Jewish economists and publishers wouldn’t dare explain the simplicity of these economic reforms to the rest of the worlds nations, thus claimed them to be a miracle, an “Economic Miracle” – No such miracle exists!

The self-described International Jewish Financiers, describe states with such economies as “Anti-Semitic States” given their policy to not facilitate Jewish usury practices or, economic control and enslavement over their nation and people. These Jewish El-ites absolutely did consider these policies as a threat to their existence (perhaps even Persecution), an existence based on parasiticism, even a war on their parasiticism – and they did indeed respond in kind.
If the economic systems of the so-called “Anti-Semitic States” had been adopted by other nations – which it certainly would have in time, if they were left alone – then their parasitic existence would have disintigrated, all their hoards of useless inanimate gold wouldn’t have helped them and they may have even had to work to support themselves. Such could not be tolerated and the answer to this was not to leave them alone, but… Total War! Declared twice by the self styled International Jewry, well before 1939.

However, they not only destroyed nations and people they couldn’t initially control, but prospered further with even more economic enslavement of those who fought their war for them. Was it really £500,000,000 to be played on the stock market, against nations whose economies could not be effected by it? Or was it the basis for so-called war loans?
The Worker did state that their “very existence might be threatened,” but it was rather by imposing debt currency onto various peoples Governments, to build war machines for their actual physical destruction.
Not only did the the future generations have this war-debt enslavement put around their necks before they were even born, but this expenditure resulted in Civilian Businessmen and Industrialists (who decided who would produce it), thrive in the biggest manufacturing boom in history, as well as thriving in the rebuilding and construction of the destroyed countries post-war.
Moreover, they not only achieved great speculative profit, great debt revenue, great business in manufacturing and construction, destruction of millions of people and families all over the world, destruction of ancient historical and irreplaceable architecture; but to top it all off, they got to keep all the gold too… not that anyone saw this half a billion pounds worth of gold that the debt currency was supposedly created on – we’ll just have to take their word for it that they had it… in any event, they didn’t lend gold out, or give any away, just created debt on its purported existence, so they risked and gave NOTHING!

We are led to believe that gold is a real asset to regulate a consistent value in money, but how does that work in reality in a debt-based currency system?
The International Jewish Financiers [allegedly] held half a billion pounds worth of gold, to which they gave to no one (risked and forfeited nothing). A half a billion pounds worth of debt was issued to various Governments based on its [alleged] existence. The Governments transferred/spent this debt-credit on armaments in the businesses of Civilian Industrialists, debt which then transformed into being half a billion pounds worth of revenue for the recipients – who are likely the same international financiers and stock investors, such as Bernard Baruch. These stock investors then received great commissions and wealth through the increased value of their shares, due to the rapid sales and manufacturing in their industrial businesses.

To summarise; They gave nothing away, they imposed half a billion pounds worth of debt, they received half a billion pounds worth of revenue from it on top of the gold they [allegedly] held, their businesses boomed and stock shares grew in value (great speculation)… and they end up demanding that they are still owed another half a billion pounds worth of revenue, due to Government default on debt payment… This is more than tripling their net worth, as well as injecting more debt-based currency into the entire currency pool – reducing the currency’s value thereby.
Remember, this does not even include the infinite interest (usury) on half a billion pounds.

Risked Nothing – Gave Nothing – Took Everything


N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.

Internment Camps: IRC Records disclose more than just death figures of 271,301 from Typhus during WWII – Soviet sabotage and German patronage


Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany: Official IRC records reveal the actual Concentration Camp total death toll was 271,301.


  1. 271,301 people of various religious denominations, races and social status’ died of disease and starvation (NOT 6 million Jews by intentional Extermination Policy).
  2. The Jewish Bolsheviks who occupied and ‘Liberated’ certain camps (namely Auschwitz), deliberately stopped food and medical supplies organised by the IRC, from reaching internees, causing further deaths and suffering.
  3. Divisions of the Reich both funded and facilitated the establishment of Jewish communities with virtually independent autonomy.
  4. Germany continued to facilitate those European Jews who wished to immigrate, from the transitional camps to various foreign lands.
  5. Approximately, more than 2.5 million Jews were not interned by the Reich and were enabled to live freely and independently in Europe, within the guidelines of various Reich policies.

Documented Facts

One of two, of the most important surveys of the Jewish Question in Europe during World War II, is David Irving’s examination of the Russian archives after the wall came down. Irving published his findings in his book, Hitler’s War and said not one word about gas chambers.

When questioned about this purported omission, he said that there was no reference to any gas chambers in the Soviet archives, therefore, he did not discuss the question of gas chambers as there was no material as evidence to support his authorship. Irving was arrested in several countries for Hate Speech for his alleged oversight of the assumed Status Quo.

The other exceedingly important survey, was that of the International Red Cross who had regular access to internment camps and during the latter period of the war, even had ICRC administration offices within camp grounds. The ICRC successfully applied the 1929 Geneva military convention, in order to gain access to civilian internees held in Central and Western Europe by the German authorities. Almost unique in its honesty and objectivity, compared with other accounts on camp activity of the day, the ICRC explained in the opening pages of their Report that their object, in the tradition of the Red Cross, had been strict political neutrality… and herein lies its great value.

The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume – Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War(download available) –  published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications;
‘Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946) and ‘Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War’ (Geneva, 1947).

In 1949, the International Red Cross interviewed internees from the German camps, to see if standards were kept within the convention guidelines – and they were. However, in defiance of the Geneva Convention, IRC personnel were forbidden to interview mostly (German, Russian, Ukrainian etc) civilian prisoners and POW’s in the Jewish Bolsheviks Gulag camps, which were extremely more harsh and true “Death Camps.”
Soviet Bolshevik powers refused to ratify the convention, but regardless, Articles 82 – 97 still applied.

The German camps held political internees (Schutzhaflinge), POW’s and those convicted of crimes. The German administration who provided supplies for internees, also welcomed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the inmates. However due to international propaganda focusing solely on the plight of Jewish people in Europe, the ICRC deliveries were originally organised for mainly Jewish recipients, who were given preference over other races and religious denominations in the camps.

Parcel Receipt

Grateful inmates sent letters of appreciation from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others.

Camp internees were provided with post-cards, stamps and other materials to communicate with the IRC, family and friends, from the camp Post Offices.

Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross reported, “…where there were about 40,000 Jews deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75).

“The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jews and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Committee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jews the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945.
They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit”
(Vol. I, p. 642).

The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania, where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanians, but only up until the time of the Jewish Bolshevik occupation.

The aid then ceased and the ICRC also complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62).
The same situation applied to other German camps after their coined “Liberation” by the Bolsheviks Gallant Red Army.

The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period prior to the Jewish-Bolshevik occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward to other locations, such as Bergen-Belsen for example, where the camp became overrun with inmates fleeing the east. A great majority voluntarily left with German officials due to the fear of the encroaching Red Army. Unfortunately, thereafter, the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Bolshevik control, were futile.

However, food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg etc.

No Mention of Gas Chambers

One of the most important aspects of the Report by the ICRC, is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war.
Says the Report:

“in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims.”

Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government informed the ICRC of the predicted reduction in supplies on February 1, 1945… then in March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S., Ernst Kaltenbrunner, gave even more decisive results.

“Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp.” (Vol. III, p.83).

Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able to as well.

Onsite ICRC Nurses
Red Cross staff on routine monthly inspections of the camps, visit and meet with internees in the camp hospital wards – keeping with the Geneva Convention, which Germany was signatory to.

The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of internees they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78).
[Barbarous Aerial Warfare Confirmed by the Allies Extermination Policy – the ‘Dehousing Paper’]

By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.

In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of “gas chambers.”
[‘The Allied Committee of Inquiry’ agrees: “No poison gas was ever used”here]

The original 1946 edition did not even make mention of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg Show Trials and Western media hysteria, the Red Cross appeared “compelled” to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641).
It is true, many people died within the camps, but the ICRC did not reference any means of deliberate extermination… and from their on-site administrative positions, never witnessed any gas chambers.

In all of its 1,650 pages, the three-volume Report does not ever mention such a thing as a ‘gas chamber’. It acknowledges that Jews and many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but its complete silence on the subject of ‘gassing’ is ample refutation of the ‘Holocaust’ legend.

Fortunately for the ICRC team – unlike David Irving – they were not arrested for ‘Hate Speech’ in regards to their record keeping omission of ‘Gas Chambers’.

Not all were interned

Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3 (I. Jewish Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jewish section of the free population and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jews were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the Free Civilian Population.

This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the purported “extermination programme” and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jew he could lay his hands on.
In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states;

“A large proportion of the Jewish minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jews, especially for those coming from Poland.”

Those who remained in Slovakia seemed to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when an extensive Allied rising against the German forces and people took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942, had brought about the internment of several thousand Jews, these people, along with other nationalities, were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the “internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).

More on camp money, coupons and where and what it could be spent on: here

Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jews of conflict zones avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jews continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jewish emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jews who had migrated to the French zone before the ‘German-French Armistice’ (the zone the west likes to refer to as “Occupied”).

“The Jews from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jews by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645).

As future U.S. citizens, these Jews were held at the Vittel Transitional camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jews from Hungary in particular, proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jews who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648).
Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the unhindered emigration of Jews still continued.

The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jews from Hungary” and from the U.S. Government, the ICRC received a message stating that;
“The Government of the United States… now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jews who in the present circumstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649).
[However, the U.S. ‘statement’ was merely political lip-service, as the behind the scenes manipulations by powerful Jewish organisations and diplomats, ensured Jewish migration to the U.S. was purposely obstructed, as they were pushing to funnel Jewish migration to Palestine only – see here]

Official International Red Cross Records Released
Sealed and Guarded Since The End Of WWII At Arolsen, Germany,
The Official IRC Records Reveal the actual Concentration Camp Total Death
Toll was… 271,301

Besides the deaths caused by starvation due to the Allies Barbarous Aerial Warfare campaign of Europe, what is it that most of these 271,301 poor souls succumbed to?
Let Dr. Charles Larson explain, who was one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, a Colonel assigned to the US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department.
As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed thousands of autopsies at some twenty German camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses.
To Dr. Larson’s knowledge, he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in the entire European Theatre” and as such, confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.”
What Dr. Larson did discover was, just as the ICRC discovered, that internees died of starvation and predominantly, Epidemic TYPHUS (better-known as Camp Fever or Famine Fever etc), a historical scourge to mankind that until recently, flourished in places where populations were crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in Germany after the Allied aerial assault on Europe at wars end.
Dr. Larson’s findings are corroborated by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D. and Dr. Russell Barton, here:


For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been repeatedly told that “six million Jews were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘Concentration Camps’ during World War II.”

Hundreds of thousands of honest people disputing this claim, have been viciously smeared as hateful anti-Semites and several countries around the world continually jail and heavily fine people for disputing the claim that “6 Million” Jews were killed by deliberate extermination policy… Even though the Jewish World Almanac recorded an increase in the Jewish population over the war period, or that even the unfortunate deaths at Auschwitz have ‘Officially’ been revised from 4 million down to 1 million – 3 million Jews rose from the dead by the flick of a pen.
People are having their lives destroyed for having a different opinion than the colloquial rumour – they are jailed for a purported Thought Crime.


Provided below is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross document, proving the so-called “Holocaust” narrative is a fabrication. Many Jews around the world have intentionally exaggerated and perpetually lied for the purpose of gaining political, emotional and financial advantages for themselves… the latter in the form of “Holocaust Survivor” Pensions, to which non-Jews who endured the same, are not eligible.
They have committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon billions of trusting people around the world!

Tax-payers of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Poland and many other nations have had multiple billions of dollars taken from their wages to be paid out to Holocaust Survivors and their descendants, for something that DID NOT HAPPEN… and least of all, what did in fact happen, was not an exclusive Jewish suffering, nor the result of German destruction – rather All-lied destruction.


The tax-payers of the United States in particular, spend Billions each year in direct and indirect military support for the State of Israel [an illegitimate, illegal and brutal occupation according to hundreds of UN Resolutions – here] which was established through the false (however ‘Official’) Sympathy of this lie.

This is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive it is incomprehensible.
Where do the innocent Germans, Americans and others go to get a refund, or perhaps reparation of their own? And what of the Palestinians, who have been pushed from their land, had their homes bulldozed and people continually slaughtered from war crimes and breach of international humanitarian law? (see above link)

The Red Cross death figures, of people from a variety of ethnicity’s and religious persuasions, combined in all camps, is precisely 271,301 – approximately half of which were Jewish. These unfortunate people died from, predominantly, Epidemic Typhus and starvation due to the Allies almost complete destruction of mid-western Europe, making the delivery of food and medical supplies, impossible.

The interviews with former Auschwitz inmates that Spielberg chose to omit from his Shoah, where they speak of camp sports on weekends, arts, plays and theatre, post office, library, musical intruments and orchestra’s, money to spend at the kantina for beer and cigarettes, movie cinema, entertainment for the children… and so much more.


The full Red Cross Report can be read and downloaded here

N. Jones is a Writer, Researcher, Historian and Literary Critic.